Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Congress: $15 Billion in Failed DHS Contracts

    Congress: $15 Billion in Failed DHS Contracts

    The Post's Dana Hedgpeth reports today that $15 billion in contracts given out by the Department of Homeland Security have been plagued by cost overruns, delays or cancellations, according to data gathered by the House Committee on Homeland Security. The committee is holding a hearing with homeland security experts today on its findings.

    Several of the problems with the contracts were first exposed by Washington Post investigations. Details of the contracts after the jump:


    * In the U.S. Coast Guard's Deepwater program, where ships were built and then scrapped, about $351 million was wasted or not subjected to proper oversight. In December 2006, Post reporters Renae Merle and Spencer S. Hsu reported: "A multibillion-dollar effort to modernize the Coast Guard's fleet has suffered delays, cost increases, design flaws and, most recently, the idling of eight 123-foot patrol boats that were found to be not seaworthy after an $88 million refurbishment."

    * A $10 billion program called US VISIT, a computer system designed to record the entry and exit of visitors to the United States at airports and border crossings, is behind schedule and not well managed. In May 2005, Post reporters Scott Higham and Robert O'Harrow Jr. reported: "Documents and interviews with people familiar with the program, called US-VISIT, show that government officials are betting on speculative technology while neglecting basic procedures to ensure that taxpayers get full value from government contractors."

    * The airport baggage screener project. Higham and O'Harrow reported in May 2005 that the contract to hire airport passenger screeners grew to $741 million from $104 million in less than a year. In June 2005, O'Harrow and Higham reported that Eclipse Events Inc., a company formed by two women with ties to the travel industry that received a $1.1 million no-bid subcontract for the screener program, saw their contract balloon to $24 million within a year, including $5.4 million to pay the salary of one of the principals for nine month's work. A Defense Contract Audit Agency report obtained by The Washington Post said auditors could not substantiate $15 million of the work invoiced by Eclipse. A subsequent Post story in October 2005 revealed that DHS officials had no documentation to justify a change in the screener contract that increased its cost by $343 million

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washin ... ailed.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    11,242
    * The airport baggage screener project. Higham and O'Harrow reported in May 2005 that the contract to hire airport passenger screeners grew to $741 million from $104 million in less than a year. In June 2005, O'Harrow and Higham reported that Eclipse Events Inc., a company formed by two women with ties to the travel industry that received a $1.1 million no-bid subcontract for the screener program, saw their contract balloon to $24 million within a year, including $5.4 million to pay the salary of one of the principals for nine month's work.
    In normal business, when someone gives a written bid or contract, it is an assurance that they can do the job within the quoted price. The only time I have ever seen a contract subjected to higher costs is when the architectural firm I worked for, and who granted the contract a couple years earlier than actual construction started and by that time a lot of the things like withstanding wind-velocity on high rises or a manufacturer going bankrupt that produced the door handles that were specked.
    No-bid contracts are an outrage to Americans, and also a complete denial of current free-market capitalism.
    The people overseeing these contracts whether competitive or no-bid should be deported (and though I would love to put a worse spin on that comment, I won't).
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member crazybird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Joliet, Il
    Posts
    10,175
    In normal business, when someone gives a written bid or contract, it is an assurance that they can do the job within the quoted price.
    Exactly.....or what's the point of bidding? Heck anyone can say anything and then just go opps.....sorry, but I need 10x's that much now.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •