Thread: Conservative Candidate Doug Hoffman Supports Amnesty

Originally Posted by Judy

Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS

Our problem is getting people to run that thinks as we do, "Builditnow" was right about that....who do you vote for when this is all you get?

Not one is any better than the other!

You vote and/or support the one who despite all other issues places their loyalty with the American People, which means if they support free trade, you support the one who doesn't, and if they don't want to stop illegal immigration, you support for the one who does. Period.

Our country is bankrupt. Most people don't really understand that just yet. We're bankrupt because of traitors who sold us out to free trade treason and illegal and excess legal immigration. We have to vote for and support the people whom we know either directly support stopping illegal immigration with no exceptions and no mercy, or whom we know will vote the party line to do so.

There is no alternative for us at this time, and in most instances, the McCains and Grahams aside, that person is going to be a Republican who supports the rights of American Workers, the financial well-being of American Families, and the sovereignty of the United States through secure borders.

We are on a mission with a cause and while we all have other issues we think about and are concerned with, the single most important task we have is to stack the US Congress with people whose loyalty is to the United States and the American People who will therefore stop illegal immigration, secure our borders, enforce US immigration law and protect our trade, after which the other issues will fall into place. We have to support people whom we know to the best of our ability to know are emotionally and philosophically devoted to our country, and no other, so they can not be swayed or bought to sell us out to globalism to end our nation and line their pockets by doing so.

Well said Judy!! UNITED WE STAND!!!!

Excellent research, Judy!

UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL

ALL FOR ONE, AND ONE FOR ALL

And it will soon be time for us to load up our buckets with ripe excessively juicy tomatoes for when these traitors line of out our of premises with PINK SLIPS clipped to their collars.

SPLAT! SPLAT! SPLAT!

Judy - You've said Scozzafava is obviously the right choice when it comes to illegal immigration, because she is obviously against illegal immigration and amnesty. You've indicated thats why anyone not supporting her should have known this.

Could you please point me to the info showing Scozzafava's views against illegal immigration? There is not a word about illegal immigration on her website. She lists several issues, but not any regarding illegal immigration.

I did a search to try to find her views on illegal immigration and amnesty. Came up with nothing.

Would appreciate the sources. Thanks.

Not only the Minutemen but now also Michelle Malkin have endorsed Hoffman. Malkin is definitely against illegal immigration.

Originally Posted by builditnow

Judy - You've said Scozzafava is obviously the right choice when it comes to illegal immigration, because she is obviously against illegal immigration and amnesty. You've indicated thats why anyone not supporting her should have known this.

Could you please point me to the info showing Scozzafava's views against illegal immigration? There is not a word about illegal immigration on her website. She lists several issues, but not any regarding illegal immigration.

I did a search to try to find her views on illegal immigration and amnesty. Came up with nothing.

Would appreciate the sources. Thanks.

Not only the Minutemen but now also Michelle Malkin have endorsed Hoffman. Malkin is definitely against illegal immigration.

There's nothing on her website about amnesty or immigration. She was picked over Hoffman by the GOP. The GOP's position is to secure the borders, enforce US immigration law and oppose amnesty. She'll vote the party line on immigration or she wouldn't have been selected to run as the GOP candidate. She isn't funded by free trade traitors at Club for Growth either, Hoffman is.

State GOP Republicans fought Spitzer on his plan to issue driver's licenses to illegal aliens in 2007 and Dede was in the State House of Representatives at that time. In fact New York GOP Republicans fought it so hard, even the Democrats chimed in and Spitzer was publicly humiliated by this defeat due to "overwhelming opposition". 77% of New Yorkers are opposed to even giving illegal aliens driver's licenses. If they don't want them to have driver's licenses, then they don't want them to have a path to citizenship. The New York GOP is opposed to amnesty, opposed to illegal immigration and supports secure borders and enforcing US Immigration Law. Dede Scozzafava was selected by the New York GOP to go to Congress over Hoffman.

You'll have to ask the Minutemen and Michelle Malkin why they're supporting a third party candidate who supports amnesty, is pro-immigration, and pro-free trade. All I can figure is that they either didn't take the time to read his website or did and support his position.

Here's a link from ThinkProgress, a Democratic website, the first that popped up on my google search. Even they see the discrepancy:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/10/28/minutemen-hoffman/

"Doug Hoffman, the Conservative Party candidate for New York’s traditionally Republican 23rd District, has just won the right-wing support of the Minuteman Political Action Committee — the political action arm of a “nativist extremistâ€

http://www.minutemanpac.com/press.asp?artid=54

"MINUTEMAN PAC ENDORSES HOFFMAN FOR CONGRESS
Minutemen Choose Conservative to Fill Vacated NY-23

"FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Oct. 21, 2009
"CONTACT: (866) 296-4904; info@minutemanpac.com

"Houston, TX--Minuteman PAC Executive Director, Brett Farley, today announced the PAC’s full endorsement of Doug Hoffman (C-NY) to fill the New York 23rd Congressional seat vacated by Rep. John McHugh, who was recently confirmed by the Senate as President Obama's new Secretary of the Army.

"Farley declared, “In a race that pits conservative Doug Hoffman against two liberals with egregious records and positions concerning national security and sovereignty, our endorsement for Hoffman is really a no-brainer.â€

Judy wrote:

There's nothing on her website about amnesty or immigration. She was picked over Hoffman by the GOP. The GOP's position is to secure the borders, enforce US immigration law and oppose amnesty. She'll vote the party line on immigration or she wouldn't have been selected to run as the GOP candidate.

And there it is. Bingo.

So you have NO info regarding Scozzafava's stance on illegal immigration. You have no sources, no quotes, nothing from her on the topic. She doesn’t even have the guts to mention it anywhere on her own website. I sure haven’t been able to find anything anywhere.

Your “proofâ€

Originally Posted by builditnow

Judy wrote:

There's nothing on her website about amnesty or immigration. She was picked over Hoffman by the GOP. The GOP's position is to secure the borders, enforce US immigration law and oppose amnesty. She'll vote the party line on immigration or she wouldn't have been selected to run as the GOP candidate.

And there it is. Bingo.

So you have NO info regarding Scozzafava's stance on illegal immigration. You have no sources, no quotes, nothing from her on the topic. She doesn’t even have the guts to mention it anywhere on her own website. I sure haven’t been able to find anything anywhere.

Your “proofâ€

Judy wrote:

So, all these people outside of the state of New York who have jumped on the band-wagon of a third party candidate who is bought and sold by the Club for Growth which supports amnesty and free trade, didn't bother to find out what Dede's position was on illegal immigration or amnesty or obviously anything else before trying to split the vote in this election to ensure that the seat goes to a pro-amnesty Conservative or a pro-amnesty Democrat.

And neither did you. Look in the mirror. Pot calling the kettle black. But thats the way it usually works, doesn't it?

Originally Posted by builditnow

Judy wrote:

So, all these people outside of the state of New York who have jumped on the band-wagon of a third party candidate who is bought and sold by the Club for Growth which supports amnesty and free trade, didn't bother to find out what Dede's position was on illegal immigration or amnesty or obviously anything else before trying to split the vote in this election to ensure that the seat goes to a pro-amnesty Conservative or a pro-amnesty Democrat.

And neither did you. Look in the mirror. Pot calling the kettle black. But thats the way it usually works, doesn't it?

No, I did try to find out if she had anything on her website about immigration. She didn't. Therefore, she has no position in support of amnesty. She has no position in support of illegal immigration. She has no position in support of free trade treason. I investigated her backers, and there are no globalists contributing to her. There are no pro-immigration groups endorsing her. The New York Republicans that are in office in New York oppose illegal immigration, she is one of them. She was selected by them out of 8 candidates to be their candidate for this special election, one of whom was Doug Hoffman. They rejected him.

Doug Hoffman on the other hand has never been part of that group. He's never been elected to represent the people of New York. Dede has served 6 terms in the New York legislature and 4 years as a Mayor, and was elected by the Republicans in the New York House to be their Pro-Tempore Leader.

Furthermore, in checking out Doug Hoffman, we find he is an affirmed pro-amnesty nut, with no backing from the New York GOP, for reasons all too obvious to me. We also learned, he's funded by the Club for Growth, which is a pro-amnesty free-trade treason bunch of globalists.

So, I have no idea what "message" you feel you should be sending to the GOP Republicans in New York, but if you think supporting a pro-immigration, pro-amnesty, pro-free trade treason globalist fruit ball is going to get you anywhere with whatever you're trying to achieve, then you are tragically mistaken.