Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    DHS: Guest worker program would help border agencies

    http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?a ... todaysnews

    December 1, 2005
    DHS: Guest worker program would help border agencies
    By Chris Strohm
    cstrohm@govexec.com

    Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said Thursday that a temporary worker program for migrants who want jobs in the United States and stronger sanctions against employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers are critical to improved border security.

    Chertoff said the government has "no other choice" but to develop a legal channel that will match willing migrants with U.S. employers in order to relieve the strain on the Border Patrol and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau. House Republicans in particular are bitterly divided on whether border security reforms should include a temporary worker program.

    "If we don't have a temporary worker program, I think it's going to be extraordinarily difficult to ask our Border Patrol agents and our ICE agents to stem the tide that is driven by a huge economic engine of employers looking for people who can work [in jobs that] won't be done by Americans," Chertoff told reporters during a briefing on the administration's Border Security Initiative.

    About 80 House lawmakers -- most of them Republicans -- wrote President Bush a letter in October saying they will be opposed to a temporary worker program until current border laws are enforced.

    Another side of border security, which has attracted less attention in recent weeks, entails punishing employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants.

    "The employers are driving the demand," Chertoff said. "Employers, by giving jobs to illegal migrants, are causing illegal migrants to come and stay."

    Chertoff said the government has an obligation to give employers "a convenient, efficient and secure way to validate and verify that they have migrants who are temporary workers." On the flip side, he added, employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers should be penalized.

    The Homeland Security Department plans to announce new regulations aimed at helping employers verify the workers' identities, Chertoff said. Currently, companies can use the Basic Pilot Employment Verification Program. But the program is voluntary and has been criticized for its reliance on old and inaccurate databases.

    Chertoff said DHS needs to examine whether employers should be required to do background checks on workers.

    "We're looking at the whole system," he said, "and I can predict in the next weeks you're going to see a number of regulatory and policy changes that will be designed to do two things: make it easier for employers to verify employment but also say that if you don't verify employment, there's going to be tougher punishment and quicker punishment."

    Critics argue, however, that ICE is understaffed and lacks the resources for effective worksite enforcement. The department primarily has been focused on enforcement operations at critical infrastructure sites, military bases and airports, they say.

    "I think there's a lot of lip service in this town about solving this problem," said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council. "I see no willingness on the part of this administration to be serious about this. They're talking as though the guest worker program will solve all the problems. If that were the case, no one would be crossing the border right now because everyone who wanted a job would already be in the country."

    Another possible measure might involve requiring migrants to return to their home countries in order to collect benefits from their employment in the United States, Chertoff added, without elaborating.

    But he said DHS does not support building a physical wall along the border. Such an effort would be "phenomenally expensive, wouldn't be particularly effective" and would still need to be backed up with technology and agents, he said.

    "You could say in some ways we're going to have a virtual fence, because we're going to use a mix of technology and Border Patrol and infrastructure to create what is in effect a barrier to entry," Chertoff said. "But it's going to be a smart fence, not a stupid fence."
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    It is very unlikely that there would be any large number of people who would come in ilegally if they were not able to get any major employer to give them work.
    Add an enforced border and our biggest problem would be having legal visitors working in homes as domestics.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399
    I think
    Oh no you don't!

    Chertoff said the government has an obligation to give employers
    The government has an obligation to protect citizens from the illegal invasion of this nation!

    Chertoff said DHS needs to examine whether employers should be required to do background checks on workers.
    Idiots in charge should quit "examining" and get down to the business of HOMELAND SECURITY!

    and I can predict
    Oh no you can't!

    Critics argue, however, that ICE is understaffed and lacks the resources for effective worksite enforcement. The department primarily has been focused on enforcement operations at critical infrastructure sites, military bases and airports, they say.
    No matter the resources and manpower, if the person leading the charge doesn't know what he's doing, the charge is DOOMED!

    Another possible measure might involve requiring migrants to return to their home countries in order to collect benefits from their employment in the United States, Chertoff added, without elaborating.
    Collect benefits? Is he talking about SS as when they reach age 65? What's happened to making them self deport and apply for a legal work permit from their legal country of residence?

    But he said DHS does not support building a physical wall along the border. Such an effort would be "phenomenally expensive, wouldn't be particularly effective" and would still need to be backed up with technology and agents, he said.
    Supporting 20,000,000+ and more everyday since last weeks shamnesty announcement is much more expensive than building a fence genius!

    "You could say in some ways we're going to have a virtual fence, because we're going to use a mix of technology and Border Patrol and infrastructure to create what is in effect a barrier to entry," Chertoff said. "But it's going to be a smart fence, not a stupid fence."
    We can SAY whatever we want and I say the US needs an intelligent Homeland Security Secretary, not a stupid Homeland Security Secretary!

    Part is his "speech" was just on tv. It's actually worse when you see him talking than when you read his latest stupid statements.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •