Thread: Don’t blunder into immigration-reform trap, activists warn Sen. Rubio

By Alexander Bolton - 04/09/13 05:00 AM ET
The Hill

Conservatives in South Carolina and Iowa are warning Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) that he is on the verge of stepping into an immigration trap.

Activists in two early primary states say that if the senator strikes a flawed reform deal this week it could hurt his White House chances in 2016.

The damage to Rubio would be worse, they say, if illegal immigrants continue to stream over the border after the Department of Homeland Security has deemed it secure.

“It remains a very divisive issue among the folks that support us,” said Oran Smith, director of the Palmetto Family Council, based in Columbia, S.C.

“You still have a very passionate group of conservatives and evangelicals who are uncomfortable with any kind of change or anything that can be considered reform.”

Rubio has taken a leading role in trying to craft a bipartisan immigration reform deal in the Senate’s Gang of Eight. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has called Rubio a “game changer” in the debate.

Activists in South Carolina and Iowa acknowledge the political landscape has shifted since 2008, when immigration dominated the debate between presidential candidates.

Republican strategists in Washington have conducted focus groups in Iowa and South Carolina showing conservative voters are open-minded about an overhaul of the nation’s immigration laws.

But the key to winning their approval is to convince them the border will be sealed before 11 million illegal immigrants get on a path to citizenship.

Smith said Rubio must be careful not to be seen as embracing a deal to enhance his political reputation in Washington.

“In a South Carolina Republican presidential primary, Marco Rubio does not hurt himself in any way by being perceived as one of the holdouts,” he said. “If he was perceived as someone who was deal-oriented versus principle-oriented, while that may etch you in the annals of history, that doesn’t really help you politically amongst the typical South Carolina voter.”

John Steinberger, a member of the 9/12 Tea Party chapter in Mt. Pleasant, S.C., said many conservative voters oppose overhauling the nation’s immigration laws all at once. They prefer a piecemeal approach that first addresses border security.

“The conservatives that I talk to want to see border security first and not have a comprehensive immigration reform bill,” he said.

Rubio initially favored passing immigration reform in steps. But he eventually opted for the comprehensive approach pushed by Senate Democratic leaders, who argued it could not be divided up.

Steinberger said he and other Tea Party voters in South Carolina would be skeptical of claims by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano that the border is secure.

“It will probably take years to really secure the border. It’s not an easy task,” he said.

He said it would be “a negative” if Rubio signed off on any deal and illegal immigrants continued to flow across the border.

Ann Trimble-Ray, the former chairwoman of the Sac County GOP central committee in western Iowa, said Rubio has not yet ingratiated himself with conservative voters in her home state.

“The fact that Sen. Rubio has said immigration reform is going to come through me is a rather aggressive stance on his part. He’s doing so, I hope, for all the right reasons,” Trimble-Ray said. “I don’t think it’s winning him extra favors in Iowa yet.”

Trimble-Ray says there is a dichotomy among conservative voters in Iowa.

“There is an overwhelming respect for the rule of law here and the immigration laws are being ignored,” she said.

But Iowa’s farm economy also depends on immigrant labor, and many farmers want to ensure access to workers.

She also noted that the unemployment rate is relatively low in Iowa — it registered at 5 percent in February — and voters may be less concerned about the impact of immigration reform on the job market than in states with high unemployment rates.

Chip Saltsman, a Republican strategist who helped former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) win the Iowa caucuses in 2008, said immigration reform is a gamble for Rubio.

Saltsman said it will be very difficult to completely secure the southern border and warned Rubio’s legacy on immigration reform could hinge on whether any law he helps pass is seen by conservatives as effectively staunching illegal immigration.

“If we don’t secure the borders, then it’s a problem again in five years or 10 years,” he said.

“If this gets passed, it’s going to be because of Marco Rubio. He’s going to put his name on it and it gives a whole lot of cover to conservatives in both chambers,” he said. “It will hurt him if it ends up in a black hole three years from now.

“On the flip side, it could be a big win for him, too. It’s high-stakes poker,” he said.

Republican candidates have won important primary states and even the party’s presidential nomination in the recent past after espousing comprehensive immigration reform.

Newt Gingrich won the 2012 South Carolina primary after arguing that it was unrealistic to expect the government to deport 11 million illegal immigrants.

Resurgent Republic, a GOP-affiliated public opinion research group, released a report at the end of March that found conservative voters in South Carolina and Iowa are willing to consider comprehensive immigration reform under certain conditions.

The research showed conservatives strongly oppose illegal immigration but do not believe the nation’s 11 million illegal residents should be deported.

Conservatives also view a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants as acceptable, if it is an earned process that does not give them priority ahead of people who are waiting in line to apply legally.

But conservatives in the focus groups insisted the border must be secured before offering legal status and paths to citizenship to people who broke the law.

“Universally, all participants agree that stronger border enforcement is absolutely necessary before moving forward with any plan for legal residency or earned citizenship,” Resurgent Republic stated in a summary of its findings.

The verdict on whether any immigration reform signed into law by President Obama accomplishes that goal will have major implications for Rubio’s White House aspirations.

Ed Gillespie, a Republican political strategist who serves on the board of directors of Resurgent Republic, said conservative voters grow more receptive toward immigration reform when they learn more about it.

He said the key is to make sure there is a adequate and transparent debate in Congress. If Democratic leaders try to rush through legislation, it will prompt a backlash from conservatives.

“The more information about immigration reform [conservative voters] get, the more likely they are to be supportive of it,” Gillespie said.

“Everybody will be suspicious if they feel like it has been jammed through. It’s a debate that benefits from more information.”

http://oneoldvet.com/

http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/2...warn-sen-rubio

Rubio's chances for a White House bid in 2016?!!! Oh come on. Be serious. Marco Rubio is not a serious candidate for the White House. When are these Republican "strategists" going to grow up and focus their attention on some real men and women who have the guts and experience to represent the American People and can not only win a primary and a general election but most importantly, actually do the job?

How many times are we going to let names and faces replace hearts and souls on US election ballots? Wake up, People.

Marco Rubio wants to continue to use brutal trade sanctions to starve Socialist Cubans 90 miles from Florida while jumping for joy with the largest trade deficit in US history with Communist China. This is someone you want to run foreign policy for the United States? Really? Trade with Cuba would create hundreds of thousands of jobs for Americans and result in a trade surplus for the United States while as we know our trade with China does the complete opposite.

Marco Rubio wants to legalize illegal aliens so they can steal jobs, deflate wages, and rob welfare coffers legally at the expense of American Workers and Taxpayers while making Americans who still have a job work until they're almost 70 and then try to live on reduced Social Security benefits and less Medicare coverage as proposed by the Ryan Budget.

I mean when Marco Rubio was at the top of his "game", as Florida Speaker of the House, he co-owned and resided in a home with another politician, and guess what? They didn't make their mortgage payments for months and lost the home to foreclosure. A cum laude graduate from the esteemed University of Miami School of Law who wants to prance around Florida and the United States earning publicly funded salaries telling everyone else how to live, but he can't see fit to make his mortgage payment, then critizes programs that would provide loan modifications for unemployed Americans during our Great Second Depression to help them from losing homes they had made payments on for years while they had a job?

Marco Rubio in 2016?! Oh grow up.