Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree5Likes
  • 3 Post By Judy
  • 1 Post By GeorgiaPeach
  • 1 Post By Judy

Thread: Dream Act Inexplicably Excludes Legal Immigrant Dreamers, Requires Applicants Violate

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    16,669

    Dream Act Inexplicably Excludes Legal Immigrant Dreamers, Requires Applicants Violate

    SEPTEMBER 15, 2017



    Dream Act Inexplicably Excludes Legal Immigrant Dreamers, Requires Applicants Violate the Law

    By DAVID BIER


    President Trump will support legislation to provide legal status to young immigrants who, as he said on Twitter, “have been in the country for many years through no fault of their own—brought in by parents at young age.” The legislation with the most cosponsors in the House and the Senate that would do so is titled the Dream Act. The proposal would help many unauthorized immigrants who deserve help, but for reasons that I cannot explain, the Dream Act prioritizes them above legal immigrant children in virtually the same position who meet all the eligibility criteria.


    Most high-skilled immigrants initially enter the United States on temporary H-1B visas. H-1B workers can bring with them their spouses and minor children. As I have explained before, H-1B children live here, attend U.S. schools, grow up and attend U.S. universities, but on their 21st birthday, they lose their legal status, and the law requires them to self-deport if they cannot find another temporary legal status. Most stay at least for a few years longer by switching to a student visa, but this status prohibits work and expires again as soon as they graduate, leaving them in the same position they were before.


    These children were “brought in by their parents” through “no fault of their own” and have “been in the country for many years”—the three criteria that President Trump mentioned for his dreamer legislation, yet the Dream Act, which would provide permanent residency, explicitly excludes them. This is not an oversight. The authors—Senators Graham and Durbin in the Senate—had to write that the law would apply only to a person “who is inadmissible or deportable from the United States” (p. 4) or who is in “temporary protective status,” which is typically given to unauthorized immigrants who can’t be deported due to a crisis in their home country.


    In other words, the only way for legal dreamers to obtain status under this bill would be to somehow find a way to violate the law in order to become “deportable.” Even then, the Dream Act makes applicants ineligible if they have violated the rules of a student visa (p. 5), which most legal immigrant dreamers have to switch to when they turn 21 to avoid deportation, unless the Secretary of Homeland Security decides that it is necessary for “humanitarian purposes or family unity” or “otherwise in the public interest” to allow them to apply. Who knows whether he would decide that in any particular case? Few legal immigrants would take the chance that he wouldn’t and risk being deported and banned from the United States for life.


    But why is the requirement to violate the law necessary in the first place? What would change if the highlighted of the portion of the bill below was removed? Everyone that the current bill protects would still receive protection. The standards for inclusion would be just as tough. All participants would still have had to reside in the country for 4 years, enter before the age of 18, not have committed any significant crimes, be a high school graduate, etc. So why prioritize unauthorized immigrants over those who are here legally? It creates perverse incentives.



    Dream Act Requirements (pp. 4-6)






    As I have also explained before, the existence of legal immigrant dreamers is a product of a broken legal immigration system. Current law allows H-1B employers to sponsor H-1B workers, their spouses, and minor children for green cards or legal permanent residency. The green card waits for these workers are decades long (see herefor a detailed explanation of that problem), so the law also allows H-1Bs waiting for a green card to extend their status and the status of their spouses and minor children indefinitely while they all wait for green cards. But despite having waited in line for many years, children of H-1B workers still lose their status as soon as they turn 21. Those who don’t self-deport then become foreign students, which provides temporary status but they cannot work and lose status again as soon as they graduate.


    Children of other high-skilled immigrants on less used visa categories—primarily L, O, and E—also face the same problem. The Recognizing America’s Children Act in the House, which some 32 Republicans have signed onto, would allow E-2 nonimmigrant children to apply for permanent legal status with unauthorized immigrant dreamers but it would exclude all other legal immigrant dreamers (p. 5). That’s better than nothing, but E-2 nonimmigrant children are only a very small portion of the legal immigrant dreamers. Why would these members open themselves up to prioritizing illegal immigrants over legal immigrants? Many members have explicitly said that they oppose a “special pathway” for illegal immigrants.


    It’s not that they want to limit the number of applicants, since both bills dramatically expand eligibility beyond the criteria for the DACA program that President Trump just announced would wind down. DACA protects only unauthorized immigrants who entered under the age of 16 before June 15, 2007 and who were under 31 as of June 15, 2012. The Dream Act would raise the age of entry to 18, the date of entry to 2013 or 2014, and remove any age requirement at the time of application (see above). The RAC Act would move the date of entry to before 2012 (p. 6). These changes would allow far more people to apply.


    In any case, the decision to ignore the plight of legal immigrant dreamers is baffling from a political standpoint. Including legal immigrant children in the Dream Act would 1) remove the criticism that the bill is unfair to legal immigrants, 2) create a new constituency to advocate for the bill, and 3) not increase the applicant pool any more than the Act’s existing changes to DACA eligibility. Someone should ask these members why they have chosen to limit their bills in this way.



    https://www.cato.org/blog/dream-act-...grant-dreamers




    Last edited by GeorgiaPeach; 09-15-2017 at 11:24 PM.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    52,023
    We need to end all this stupidity. NO DACA. You come here on a 6 year visa, you be out of here on or before that expires along with your entire family. You come here illegally, know now that you only have deportation ahead of you, you will never be granted a legal right to do anything in this country.

    Just end all this stupidity. We spend billions of dollars paying tens of thousands of people to process all this paperwork. We don't want to pay for it. We want our own people to go to work, go to college if they wish, and pursue any and all the opportunities that opens up for them.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    16,669
    CATO lobbies for more dreamer foreign citizens. Yes, they are legal but the American citizen dreamers of all ages should be the first priority at all times.

    Legal immigration in many ways is as great a threat as illegal immigration. The visa overstays were once legally here. This government is a mess. They can find and punish American citizens but foreign citizens run around and get away with breaking laws and fraud, etc.
    Judy likes this.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    52,023
    It's all a threat at this point, it's a deluge. Water is wonderful, essential to life, but a deluge of it destroys and kills.
    GeorgiaPeach likes this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. DREAM Act a nightmare for legal immigrant
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-08-2012, 12:50 PM
  2. DREAM Act applicants could be deported later
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-13-2012, 04:45 PM
  3. New law requires Utah drivers to prove legal status
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-25-2009, 12:43 PM
  4. Mayor excludes illegal immigrant resolution debate
    By Dixie in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-07-2007, 03:34 PM
  5. Legal immigrant followed dream of coming to America
    By jimpasz in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 02:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •