Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,457

    Employers Oppose Hiring Provisions in Immigration Bill

    Employers Oppose Hiring Provisions in Immigration Bill

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... id=topnews

    By Krissah Williams
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Sunday, June 3, 2007

    As Congress reconvenes this week, businesses and their lobbyists are gearing up to fight a series of proposed changes to immigration law that they say will complicate hiring.

    Their target is Senate legislation that would legalize an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants but also significantly change employment law. Among employers' top concerns is a provision imposing criminal liability for employers if their subcontractors hire illegal workers. The legislation would also increase civil penalties for employers caught hiring illegal workers.

    Life Along 'La Linea'

    The U.S.-Mexico border is at the forefront of a growing debate over U.S. immigration and border security reform.

    The maximum criminal penalty for a pattern of hiring illegal workers would increase to $75,000 per illegal worker from $3,000.

    Under the bill, a business might have to vet the employment files of its subcontractors, which lawyers said would be an onerous task.

    "They are not your people, [and] it is much more difficult to ensure there are controls in place at another company," said Daniel Brown, a lawyer at Paul Hastings in the District and a former general counsel for the Department of Homeland Security. "That's a huge burden on a huge number of employers."

    Businesses say the legislation, which senators are to resume debating this week, could result in a hiring nightmare because of a provision calling for an expansion of a sometimes faulty worker database.

    "We've got grave concerns," said Susan R. Meisinger, chief executive of the Society for Human Resource Management, which has 200,000 members.

    The bill would require that the nation's 7.5 million businesses begin within 18 months to use a screening system run by the Department of Homeland Security called Basic Pilot to vet new hires. Within three years, businesses would have to verify every worker.

    The businesses, working under an umbrella organization called the HR Initiative for a Legal Workforce, have run advertisements in Capitol Hill publications decrying the federal database. They have also been making the rounds of congressional offices, hoping to sway legislators and find a champion for their cause.

    The database question is a "huge sleeper issue," said Heath Weems, director of education and workforce policy for the National Association of Manufacturers. Employers like to point out that meatpacker Swift & Co. was voluntarily using the Basic Pilot screening program when a Department of Homeland Security raid last year discovered that hundreds of workers were illegal. Employers have complained that Basic Pilot's data is often out of date, particularly when people have changed their names or immigration status. If the database doesn't recognize the new name, the employee cannot be legally hired.

    The White House and the senators who are shepherding the immigration legislation have said tougher employment verification requirements are essential to stem illegal immigration. The Bush administration released a statement last week saying that Basic Pilot will be up to speed for the task and that it verifies 92 percent of workers as eligible for employment within three seconds. It flags potential problems with the others at the same speed.

    Business groups are also battling provisions that restrict their ability to hire foreign workers. Employers of skilled workers worry that changes to the visa distribution program proposed by the bill would limit their ability to recruit internationally. They also say the legislation does not substantially increase visas available to skilled workers under existing law.

    Robert Hoffman, the top lobbyist at Oracle, plans to send a letter to every senator on Monday asking for support of an amendment by Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and John Cornyn (R-Tex.). The amendment would remove restrictions that force employers to recruit foreign workers only from a government-approved pool and exempt from visa limits foreigners who have earned advanced degrees in the United States.

    Employers of unskilled workers approve of the Senate's proposal to give the nation's 12 million illegal workers employment papers but say a guest-worker program that offers business 200,000 visas to fill specific holes in the U.S. economy is too small.

    "If there is no economic rationale for the number, then people will continue to come illegally," said Craig Silvertooth, director of federal affairs at the National Roofing Contractors Association.

  2. #2
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    In other words, they don't give a damn about our contry, just give them all the cheap labor they can get.
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,399
    Quote Originally Posted by WavTek
    In other words, they don't give a damn about our contry, just give them all the cheap labor they can get.
    I'd say that pretty well sums it up, Wav.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •