Results 1 to 2 of 2
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By Scott-in-FL

Thread: Exclusive–Lonergan: The Left’s Border Wall Legal Strategy Is Failing

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Scott-in-FL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014

    Exclusive–Lonergan: The Left’s Border Wall Legal Strategy Is Failing

    Exclusive–Lonergan: The Left’s Border Wall Legal Strategy Is Failing

    by BRIAN LONERGAN8 Aug 2020

    The Supreme Court’s recent decision that allows construction of the border wall to continue was a huge win for President Trump and his supporters. Beyond what it means in the short term, the decision revealed something that the mainstream media will never report: for all its energy and bravado, the left’s vaunted efforts to block Trump’s construction of the border wall have largely been a failure.

    President Trump’s election victory in November 2016 was a political tsunami that sent the Washington establishment and the radical left into a state of shock. Since then, they have directed all their considerable resources to delaying or destroying Trump’s agenda. High on the list of targeted agenda items was “Build that wall,” the signature immigration proposal of Trump’s campaign.

    The Nancy Pelosi-led opposition in Congress was the first wave of attack, opposing all White House efforts to earmark funding for wall construction.
    After a 35-day partial government shutdown over the funding, Trump reached a deal that included only a paltry sum for the wall. But he then declared a national emergency at the border, which enabled him to re-allocate $2.5 billion from the Pentagon budget to wall construction. At this point, the political battle became a legal one.

    The anti-wall legal forces employed their time-tested strategy: shop the nation for the most left-leaning lower courts to get favorable decisions.
    These provide low-hanging fruit, as the activists can get consistent results from courts like the notoriously liberal Ninth Circuit.

    These tactics were meant to delay the wall for years, with construction blocked as meritless preliminary injunctions wound their way through the appeals system. While such delaying tactics might usually work, this time they hit a snag. The 5-4 conservative majority on the Supreme Court ruled in July of last year to suspend the injunctions, allowing wall construction to go on until the Supreme Court finally decides the issue. The recent decision in Trump v. Sierra Club continued that suspension,prompting Justice Stephen Breyer to lament in his dissent that the decision “may operate, in effect, as a final judgment.”

    A major reason the anti-wall forces are failing is that their arguments simply don’t hold water. As the Immigration Reform Law Institute’s brief in Sierra Club showed, in the National Emergencies Act and various military appropriations statutes, Congress clearly provided that the President, in an emergency, could transfer military funds to military construction projects, and that building a border wall meets the statutory definition of a “military construction project.” Whatever injunctions or other favorable rulings the left can get in their cherry-picked lower courts, a sober assessment of the law at the Supreme Court under its current composition was bound to go against them.

    The other flimsy argument used in last month’s case was an environmental one made by the Sierra Club. Through its ACLU lawyers, it claimed that it had standing to sue because wall construction is causing irreversible damage to legally protected cacti and other desert wildlife, as well as sacred tribal lands of Native Americans in the region.

    The problem is, military appropriation statutes were not written to coddle the aesthetic sensibilities of self-proclaimed “environmentalist” groups, so injury to those sensibilities give them no standing to sue. Indeed, the argument is a case of shameless projection coming from the Sierra Club. The kind of unfettered illegal immigration sought by the anti-wall lobby is dramatically more damaging to the environment than any limited construction project. Decades ago, the Sierra Club, in exchange for a large donation, agreed to ignore that damage. That is the dirty little secret it has been hiding with its virtue-signaling opposition to national borders.

    There is overwhelming evidence that immigration-generated population growth is fueling an increase in energy demand and the waste product that accompanies it. Immigrants to the United States alone produce about four times more carbon dioxide in the United States as they would have in their countries of origin.

    In the border areas specifically, illegal immigration does terrible damage to the environment. The impact of this unending migration includes watershed degradation, soil erosion, damage to infrastructure, loss of vegetation and wildlife, and escaped campfires. Committed environmental groups like the Sierra Club should be leading the charge against this environmental crisis. Instead, because money talks, they file lawsuits to enable it to continue.

    Make no mistake, the well-funded anti-borders movement does not sleep, is not surrendering, and will be back to fight another day. Anyone doubting that should consider the comments of ACLU attorney Dror Ladin after their recent Supreme Court defeat. “The administration has admitted that the wall can be taken down if we ultimately prevail,” he said, “and we will hold them to their word and seek the removal of every mile of unlawful wall built.” Even though this decision on construction didn’t go their way, they will simply work to dismantle the wall after construction is completed. This is not a battle that will have a clear end, but one that requires constant participation from those who want to preserve their safety and our national sovereignty.

    As long as the Supreme Court’s majority tilts conservative and the left’s arguments are built on sand, however, these purveyors of lawlessness will continue to come up short in their mission to delay and destroy.
    Beezer likes this.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Full speed ahead on building as quickly as possible. Get every able bodied worker down there and get it done!

    Deport 100% and make their Embassy pay for it. We are not their travel agent.

    We are no longer the dumping ground for the world giving their President's a free pass to dump their responsibilities over our border.

    They MUST be given a Comprehensive Plan for Reform or no more aid and no visas. No more immigration...period.

    These countries need to put their gangs in prisons and execute them. They have overrun their communities and now that cancer is spreading rapidly across the USA and the world. Put them down and put a dent in this violent vermin destroying our lives.

    Then and only then can these countries recover, begin to get investments, and get on the road to peace and prosperity.


Similar Threads

  1. EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: “We Build the Wall” Completes First Half Mile of US Border Wall in 4
    By GeorgiaPeach in forum Videos about Illegal Immigration, refugee programs, globalism, & socialism
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-31-2019, 01:56 PM
  2. Exclusive–Brandon Judd: Border Crossers ‘Being Dropped Off’ in U.S. While New Wall Ha
    By stoptheinvaders in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2019, 09:32 PM
  3. Exclusive — Kevin McCarthy on Border Wall Funding: We Must ‘Finish the Job’
    By stoptheinvaders in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-23-2018, 09:44 PM
  4. Exclusive–Rep. King: The Supreme Court Just Laid the Foundation for the Border Wall
    By GeorgiaPeach in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-27-2018, 11:59 PM
  5. Exclusive: Less than 25% of Republicans in Congress endorse border wall funding in US
    By Judy in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-20-2017, 02:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts