Thread: Mexico's Fox Calls for North American Union in Book

MEXICO'S FOX CALLS FOR NORTH AMERICAN UNION IN BOOK

Thursday, October 11, 2007 - FreeMarketNews.com

NEWS ANALYSIS AND OPINION

US President George Bush and Mexico's former leader Vincente Fox should speak more often. President Bush fairly recently scoffed at reports of a North American Union as "conspiratorial."

But according to Steve Watson at Infowars.com, the former Mexican head of state has come out with a book that "admits plans for a North American union" and calls for a single currency.

See: http://www.infowars.net/articles/octobe ... 007Fox.htm

=====

WorldNetDaily yesterday carried the following article about Fox:

Ex-Mexican prez: 'Amero' on the way - Vicente Fox confirms long-term deal worked out with President Bush

See: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=58052

=====

Like InfoWars and WorldNetDaily, FMNN has regularly covered this incredibly important - and mindboggling - story. Last year, the network posted a popular, North American union timeline by High Alert commentator Anthony Wile that was used as one of the template items in the formation of a Canadian resistance group to the elite-planned North American Union and also spawned other, even more elaborate timelines.

http://www.freemarketnews.com/Analysis/ ... 4&nid=5879

Like many others in the alternative press, FMNN initially became aware of plans to merge America, Canada and Mexico when the courageous Phyllis Schlafly first wrote about it. At the time it seemed incredible, but a CFR White Paper confirmed Schlafly's report. Schlafly, WorldNetDaily and others in the alternative press (and Lou Dobbs who for some reason still reports for CNN) have made it impossible for those planning a North American Union to do so secretly.

Unlike the European Union, activists in North America are well aware of how such elite plans tend to "evolve" - and also how they often tend to slow down and "lose steam" once they are exposed.

Telling the truth often works when such plans are laid in secrecy and depend on the hot-house effect of confidentiality to blossom. Just last month, President Bush was all-but-denying the possibility of a North American Union. It would seem the obvious resistance to such a structure may be causing a schism between elite planners as to how to lay the groundwork for such an event.

Here is how President Bush responded to a question about the North American Union asked to him at The three-nation summit at Montebello, Quebec in early September. See Phyllis Schlafly's EagleForum.org for full story.

====

http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2007/s ... 09-05.html

See $64,000 question was posed by a Fox News reporter, Bret Baier. He asked all three heads of state, "Can you say today that this is not a prelude to a North American Union, similar to a European Union?"

Their response was positively sensational. None of the three denied that SPP is leading to a North American Union. The White House transcript of the news conference allows us to assume that the elites of the three countries are, indeed, moving toward North American integration.

Bush insulted the questioner and those who want an answer by accusing them of believing in a "conspiracy." Bush twice said he was "amused" by such speculation, but as Queen Victoria famously said, "We are not amused."

Instead of addressing the crux of the question about plans to integrate the three North American countries, Bush resorted to ridicule. He sneered at his critics as "comical," and accused them of engaging in "political scare tactics" and wanting "to frighten our fellow citizens into believing that relations between us are harmful for our respective peoples."


http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=50078

I would suggest he takes his Broke A_ S back to his Broke A_S country and take his morally, ethically and alcoholically challenged citizens with him

It would be appriciated if he would take our broke A_S corrupt Presidente with him