Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    SOB Study cites immigrants economic impact

    Study cites immigrants' economic impact
    By JASON CLAYWORTH • jclayworth@dmreg.com • June 6, 2008

    Read Comments(5Recommend
    Iowa's economy would lose $4.4 billion in annual spending if all undocumented workers were exported from the state, a spokesman for a national advocacy group said Thursday.

    "If you looked at just the beneficial impact of the hardworking immigrants in this state, even the undocumented ones, you'd see a tremendous benefit from the labor that they're performing," said Brent Wilkes, the national executive director of the League of United Latin American Citizens
    .


    Wilkes was a member of a five-person panel in Des Moines that discussed Iowa's continuing struggle with immigration issues. The forum was held at Des Moines Area Community College's urban campus.

    The impact estimate comes from a report conducted for Americans for Immigration Reform by the Perryman Group, a Texas financial analysis firm. It estimated that eliminating the estimated 8.1 million undocumented workers in the United States would cause $1.757 trillion in annual lost spending and $651.5 billion in lost output.
    There are almost 25,200 undocumented workers in Iowa, according to the report.

    Wilkes and other panel members noted projected labor shortages in the state, saying immigrants help fill a gap that would otherwise place hardships on the state's economy.

    Rep. Kraig Paulsen, a Republican from Hiawatha, said strict focus upon the benefits of undocumented laborers ignores the real issue.

    "That really misses the entire point," said Paulsen, who did not attend the forum.

    "At the end of the day, these people are either here legally or illegally. How much money they spend doesn't all of a sudden legitimize that they're here illegally," he said.

    Thursday's immigration panel members generally spoke in favor of better federal enforcement of existing laws. They also advocated policies allowing illegal immigrants already in the United States the opportunity to become citizens.

    Members also generally agreed that legislative proposals in Iowa to curb illegal immigration will probably fail unless they are adopted in conjunction with federal efforts.

    Several legislative proposals dealing with immigration failed during this year's legislative session. Lawmakers of both parties said the state should act because federal government has long failed to get a grip on the problem.

    One of the key legislative ideas would have prevented employers from hiring undocumented workers as independent contractors, which is a method sometimes used to skirt immigration laws.

    Beth Wessel-Kroeschell, a Democrat from Ames who was one of Thursday's speakers, said Iowa should close the independent contractor loophole. But she criticized federal immigration raids as "making no impact whatsoever on the real problem."

    Davenport resident Henry Vargas was one of about 150 people who attended the forum.

    He told the panel that it's time for Iowa residents and lawmakers to take charge of the issue.

    "You've got to stop passing the buck to the feds," Vargas said.






    http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/p ... /1001/NEWS
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    There is an argument used by the opposition that if you can not find a walk in employee in your local area then it should be possible to hire an immigrant even if they are illegal. Instead the employers should be the ones who are out actively looking for new employees. If they can not find people in their area they should look outside IN THE USA. If an area has too few employees and people will not move then a new plant should be set up where the employees can be found.


    The likelyhood is that the same benefit Wilkes is describing as coming from the earnings of the illegal aliens would come from currently unemployed Americans instead.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •