Results 1 to 10 of 10
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
07-24-2007, 10:25 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 2,853
GA: Road builder won't bid for jobs
Road builder won't bid for jobs
By BEN SMITH
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 07/24/07
One of Georgia's biggest road-building companies says it won't bid on any more Gwinnett County contracts — for now — as a result of a new county policy meant to crack down on illegal immigrants.
E.R. Snell Contractor Inc. told the county commissioners in a July 9 letter that it had "serious concerns" about an ordinance the commissioners adopted June 26. The ordinance requires companies that do county business to verify that their workers are in the United States legally.
THE STORY SO FAR
June 26 — The Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners votes 4-0 to require companies seeking county contracts to verify that their employees are in the United States legally.
July 20 — Three county commissioners say that some contractors have complained about the ordinance. "The general complaint is that it might be impossible for a county contractor to comply," says Commissioner Bert Nasuti.
RELATED LINK:
• More Gwinnett news
Snell is the prime contractor on four of seven state road projects in Gwinnett — work that costs $72 million, said Teri Pope, spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Transportation. It's also a company with strong roots in Gwinnett: The city of Snellville is named for the family behind the company.
Snell's letter is one of several the commissioners have received in recent weeks that questions or criticizes the ordinance. The Journal-Constitution obtained the letters Monday through the state Open Records Act.
"We have serious concerns with certain parts of the obligations imposed upon us by the ordinance," wrote Vice President David Snell. "For this reason we wish to inform you that E.R. Snell Contractor Inc. will suspend bidding on all Gwinnett County contracts until we become satisfied that we can comply with the obligations imposed upon us by the ordinance."
Snell's letter argues that some of the verification requirements are unworkable and possibly illegal. Snell did not return a phone call seeking comment.
Gwinnett Commissioner Lorraine Green, who sponsored the new ordinance, said she has met with Snell since receiving his letter.
"I believe we have fully explained the procedures to Mr. Snell and others and I think we have satisfied their concerns," Green said.
On June 26, the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners revised a purchasing ordinance to require vendors bidding on county contracts to provide evidence that their workers, as well the employees of their subcontractors, are not illegal immigrants.
It also empowers county auditors to inspect the work sites of companies after they've won bids and started working on a project. That includes inspecting the companies records and interviewing its workers.
Snell called the new ordinance "well-intentioned," and he complimented the commissioners for "seeking to alleviate the undocumented immigrant worker issue." But he said it would be impractical — and possibly unconstitutional —for the company to do what the ordinance requires.
For example, Snell wrote that requiring companies to divulge the Social Security numbers of employees to county auditors "violates the privacy and legal rights of our employees."
Some of Snell's complaints were echoed by Charles Surasky, an attorney for the Georgia Utility Contractors Association.
In a July 16 letter to the board, Surasky argued that the ordinance is unconstitutional on at least three grounds: It's pre-empted by existing federal immigration law, it usurps the federal government's exclusive power to regulate immigration and violates the due process rights of contractors.
Surasky also warned that the ordinance is likely to be challenged in federal court.
"The amount of expense and time involved in defending a federal lawsuit should not be underestimated," Surasky wrote. "Taxpayers' money could potentially be used to fund years of litigation in defense of an ordinance that will likely be struck down."
"[It] will have a negative effect," Surasky wrote " on the people it purports to protect: the citizens and taxpayers of Gwinnett County."
http://www.ajc.com/gwinnett/content/met ... _0724.html
-
07-24-2007, 10:33 AM #2
I hope someone who lives in Georgia makes sure the feds know that state highways are possibly being built with illegal aliens, and asks for an investigation. That $72 million includes a lot of U.S. tax dollars.
-
07-24-2007, 10:34 AM #3
Businesses that refuse to ensure that workers are legal should not be given jobs for Federal, state or local governments. Those businesses have earned enough off the american people by paying illegals low wages. Americans will do construction jobs for good pay and benefits.
-
07-24-2007, 10:44 AM #4
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 659
E.R. Snell Contractor Inc. told the county commissioners in a July 9 letter that it had "serious concerns" about an ordinance the commissioners adopted June 26. The ordinance requires companies that do county business to verify that their workers are in the United States legally."We have decided man doesn't need a backbone any more; to have one is old-fashioned. Someday we're going to slip it back on." - William Faulkner
-
07-24-2007, 10:49 AM #5
Mission and Values
E.R. Snell Contractor, Inc. has conducted business accordingly for five generations with the highest standards of ethics that were set forth by E.R. Snell more than 75 years ago. ERS will continue to uphold these ethics and standards for years to come in every commitment that is made by the company.
Mission Statement
E.R. Snell Contractor, Inc was built on Christian beliefs with honesty and integrity leading the way. Our goal is to build a safe and modern highway system while preserving the natural environment. Through quality production and high safety standards, we strive to be the best contractor possible, while continuing to be a positive influence on our employees and our community.
-
07-24-2007, 11:53 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Oregon (pronounced "ore-ee-gun")
- Posts
- 8,464
For example, Snell wrote that requiring companies to divulge the Social Security numbers of employees to county auditors "violates the privacy and legal rights of our employees.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-24-2007, 12:06 PM #7
I sent an email to E R Snell suggesting the feds should be investigating them for the possible use of illegals. ESPECIALLY since state highways are built with a lot of FEDERAL TAXPAYER DOLLARS.
Here is the address if you would like to send an email!!!!
bsnell@ersnell.com <bsnell@ersnell.com>.
-
07-24-2007, 12:10 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Posts
- 2,853
Originally Posted by NCByrd
-
07-24-2007, 02:10 PM #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 7,377
You know the arguments these people put forth are so lame and so thin, there is no substance to them.
American employers have always had to comply with a lot of laws regarding employment. Why is this one law of checking one's SS# such a hardship?
Of course, it isn't - they just want us to subsidize their obscene profits. Of course, also with illegal workers, there are less of the other laws they have to abide by - such as workman's comp, workplace safety, overtime, etc. etc.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-24-2007, 03:04 PM #10
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Location
- Dallas
- Posts
- 1,149
Originally Posted by apropos
Man with alleged ties to ISIS lived in US for two years prior to...
05-03-2024, 07:47 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports