Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    WA-Immigrants push initiative targeting those here illegally

    Immigrants push state initiative targeting those here illegally

    Two women, both legal immigrants to the U.S., were answering questions and collecting signatures on what might seem an unlikely ballot initiative: one that would crack down on illegal immigrants living in Washington state.

    By Lornet Turnbull






    Forrest Wald signs a petition for state Initiative 1056, offered Sunday by Indonesia native Tiarani Samsi at Lake Sammamish State Park.
    Related

    Lorie Graff married her American husband at a ceremony in Washington, D.C., in the late 1950s, before returning to Canada to apply for a green card so she could live in the U.S. legally.

    In the 1990s, Tiarani Samsi was able to finally follow her husband to the U.S. from Indonesia, after waiting three years for the legal papers.

    On Sunday, the two women — now both U.S. citizens and close friends — stood outside the entrance to the Tastin' n Racin' Festival at Lake Sammamish Park, answering questions and collecting signatures on what might seem an unlikely ballot initiative: one that would crack down on illegal immigrants living in the state.

    "Everybody should have to follow the right path," Samsi said. "That's only fair."

    In the debate over illegal immigration, people like Samsi and Graff, who came to this country legally, seldom speak out against illegal immigration.

    Rather, many legal immigrants lend their voices to marches and protests in the belief the fate of all immigrants is inextricably linked.

    I-1056, the initiative Graff and Samsi support, would deny driver's licenses to all illegal immigrants in Washington state, one of only three states that allow it.

    Additionally, it would deny them most nonemergency public benefits, including lottery winnings and college assistance.

    It would require all employers — public and private — to use a federal verification system to identify illegal immigrants and require all government agencies, including law enforcement, to cooperate with immigration authorities.

    Beginning in 2006 and every year since, one group or another of Washington citizens has tried — and failed — to get similar initiatives either on the statewide ballot or before the Legislature.

    July 2 deadline

    This year, they need at least 241,153 signatures by July 2 to get the measure on the November ballot. Craig Keller, an activist heading the initiative, said that without money their chances remain slim.



    Even the state Republican Party, which held its convention in Vancouver, Wash., over the weekend, isn't supporting I-1056.

    The measure was included in the "do not pass" packet of resolutions that failed to win party endorsement at the convention.

    "There's a minority of influential people who are uncomfortable with an honest discussion with the immigration issue," Keller said. "They either want to recruit illegals into the party or they have a business interest in making money from the status quo."

    Graff said her feelings about immigration haven't changed in the more than 50 years she's been in the U.S.

    "I was married in the U.S. but chose to return to Canada, so I could come back here legally. That was important to me," she said.

    It took four months for her paperwork to be processed. These days, it can take many years for separated spouses to reunite.

    She recognizes that Canadians are treated much differently than Mexicans, although both come from countries that share a border with the U.S. Mexicans need a visa to enter the United States. Canadians and people from most European countries do not.

    Further, most of the nearly 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. have no easy way to make themselves legal. Individuals would need an immediate family member, like a spouse, to petition on their behalf for legal status.

    And even then, they may have to return to their home country and wait up to 10 years before they can return here legally.

    Enforcement backed

    Graff said the U.S. has the right to enforce its immigration laws.

    "I understand the plight of poor people who continue to want to come here," she said. "But if you come here without going through the proper process you should be deported."

    Samsi, who first came to the U.S. in 1995, three years after she and her husband married, said she understands the draw this country has on people like them — the economic advantages, the opportunities for a better life and education for their children.

    But she said, "I believe you have to be legal if you want to work in the U.S."

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/l ... cation=rss
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member ReggieMay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,527
    Legal immigrants in our area are among the most outspoken against illegal immigration. My significant other works with a Polish man who recently took his children to a professional soccer match. He had to leave before the game started because the Hispanics booed and carried on during the National Anthem to the point where he felt that he and his children were not safe there. This is a man that realizes the negative effect of illegal immigration. More than a matter of fairness, he understands the impact of millions of uneducated and poor illegals that hold allegiance, not to his new country, but to their homeland.
    "A Nation of sheep will beget a government of Wolves" -Edward R. Murrow

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    Legal immigrants in our area are among the most outspoken against illegal immigration.


    That is true through out the United States.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Richard wrote,
    Quote:
    Legal immigrants in our area are among the most outspoken against illegal immigration.


    That is true through out the United States.
    As it should be. Who in their right mind would uproot themselves and family and make such a move, legally speaking, only to come to a country where the rule of law only applies to certain people?

    Our politicians should be ashamed of themselves for acting in such traitorous fashions.

  5. #5
    Seter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    35
    I work with five immigrants from India that have been going through the process of becoming citizens over the past few years. Their view points on illegal immigration fit right in with what this site is about.

    I really don't understand how our government can even think about this immigration reform when it's nothing but a slap in the face to those, like my friends, that are doing it the right way.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •