Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    GLOBAL ELITE GATHER IN D.C.

    GLOBAL ELITE GATHER IN D.C.

    Trilateral Commission members want suffering U.S. taxpayers to shell out even more money

    The Trilateral Commission—one of the three most powerful globalist groups in the world—held closed-door meetings right here in Washington, D.C. from April 25 to 28. True to form, those members of the media who knew about the meeting—or were themselves participants in the proceedings—refused to discuss what went on inside or report on the attendees. Luckily, AFP’s own editor, Jim Tucker, was on the scene to bust this clandestine confabulation wide open.



    By James P. Tucker Jr.

    Luminaries at the Trilateral Commission meeting in Washington expressed confidence that they own all three major presidential candidates, who, despite political posturing, will support sovereignty-surrendering measures such as NAFTA and the “North American Union.â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    [quote]This panel had these orders for the next president: increase foreign aid across the board because “America does not pay its fair share,â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Americanpatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    1,603
    [quote]MEDIA BLACKOUT

    Bill Emmott, another kept journalist, spoke on “the rise of Asiaâ€
    <div>GOD - FAMILY - COUNTRY</div>

  4. #4
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    I do hope everyone remembers Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister of Englands speech during the same time frame

    Very little men with big money backing... Bush falls into this group as well, he initiated the envasion as well as fueled the mortgage meltdown pushing mortgages to people (Minoritys) who couldnt afford them ... all of these men to include Bush should be charged with Treason.... isnt pushing for damage to our country or sovernty a Treasonous event and or Sedition if it is not the peoples will.

    Sedition, in law, term referring to conduct directed against the state or intending to excite disaffection with it and with those exercising authority. Such conduct generally takes the form of writing, publishing, or making speeches inciting citizens to overthrow established governmental authority. Sedition differs from treason in that it does not involve overt acts of open violence or assistance to an enemy.

    In October 1949, 11 leaders of the Communist Party of the U.S. were convicted of violating the Smith Act, popularly known as the 1940 Sedition Act. The Smith Act prohibited advocacy of the violent overthrow of the U.S. government or the organization of any group promulgating such a philosophy. In Dennis v. United States (1951), the Supreme Court of the United States upheld the constitutionality of the act. The Court concluded that the 'gravity of the 'evil'' justified an invasion of free speech under the circumstances, despite the fact that the speech in question did not create a clear and present danger. The Court later formulated a more stringent test for suppression of political speech and the Smith Act has fallen into disuse.




    Treason
    Encyclopedia Article
    Introduction; English Law; Treason in U.S. History

    I Introduction

    Treason, criminal offense involving the attempt, by overt acts, to overthrow the government to which the offender owes allegiance, or to betray the state to a foreign power.

    II English Law

    Print this section
    Two grades of treason existed in early English law: high treason, which was directed against the Crown, and petty treason, which consisted of a crime against a subject, such as a wife killing her husband, or a servant murdering his master.

    In early English statutes the more serious offenses were compassing or imagining the death of the sovereign, adhering to the sovereign's enemies and giving them aid and comfort, and levying war against the sovereign. Statutes were changed from time to time between the reign of Edward III and that of Elizabeth I. After the Restoration the Stuart judges used “constructive treasonâ€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    These people make me sick...I do believe it is going to be hard to get a 3rd party in but we can not give up trying.....We have to stop this shadow government and take our country back.
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    April
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS
    These people make me sick...I do believe it is going to be hard to get a 3rd party in but we can not give up trying.....We have to stop this shadow government and take our country back.
    IF more of us get really MAD/fedup and take ACTION we can turn this insanity around!!! It is up to us to save our country, our government could care less.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    165
    There is no time for another political avenue, like a third party! The projected date of NAU takeover was 2010. Even though we slowed them down with stalling comprehensive immigration reform, progress is continuing. I estimate around 2012 will be the end of us. We have to get a non-CFR president in with this election. We can't wait till the next one. Also, if doing so requires destroying the parties, then we better damn well do it.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •