Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    tms
    tms is offline

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tancredo District!!
    Posts
    631

    GOP Immigration Bill Includes National ID Language

    www.stevequayle.com or
    http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=10753

    GOP Immigration Bill Includes National ID Language

    by Robert B. Bluey
    Posted Dec 8, 2005

    An immigration reform bill moving quickly through the U.S. House of Representatives contains language requiring the Social Security Administration, Treasury Department and Department of Justice to study the concept of a machine-readable Social Security card with a photo ID.

    The House Judiciary Committee approved the legislation (H.R. 4437), sponsored by Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R.-Wis.), on a party-line 23-15 vote Thursday. Next week the House is set to vote on the bill, which calls for mandatory verification of employees’ legal status and increases enforcement along the Mexican border.

    But language about the machine-readable Social Security cards has alarmed civil libertarians who fear it could lead to a national ID card for all Americans.

    Language in the bill requires the Social Security Administration, Treasury Department and Department of Justice to submit a report to Congress nine months after the bill’s enactment that explores the idea of “Social Security cards that are made of a durable plastic or similar material and that include an encrypted, machine-readable electronic identification strip and a digital photograph of the individual to whom the card is issued.�

    The cards would be issued to both U.S. citizens and non-citizens who are employed or seeking employment and applicants for new Social Security cards or new Social Security numbers. The report requires an examination of the feasibility for employers to use the machine-readable cards to identify an employee’s eligibility for hire based on a “unified database� maintained by the Department of Homeland Security.

    Civil libertarians attacked the bill Thursday.

    “This shameful incongruity in national ID language is a textbook example of Orwellian doublethink,� said Liberty Coalition National Director Michael Ostrolenk. “A real border security law would secure the borders, making this kind of police-state Big Brother tracking of Americans unnecessary. I strongly urge Congress to remove this section.�

    While the Liberty Coalition expressed concern about the government’s studying the concept of a machine-readable Social Security card, it also criticized language that would require employers to start verifying job applicants’ legal status -- a provision that has the support of conservative Republicans seeking to crack down on employment of illegal aliens.

    The illegal alien verification system, to be maintained by the Department of Homeland Security, would offer employers a toll-free telephone number to check an employee’s status as a U.S. citizen. Within three days, employers would have an answer from the government.

    “Even setting aside concerns of intentional ‘blacklisting’ of innocent Americans, even a small error rate could mean millions of Americans forced out of work by computer mistakes,� said Liberty Coalition Policy Director James Plummer. “Homeland Security has a poor record of putting innocent Americans on secretive “no-fly� lists, and should not be entrusted with determining who is allowed is to make a living in this country.�

    Mr. Bluey is editor of Human Events Online.
    "The defense of a nation begins at it's borders" Tancredo

  2. #2
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    But language about the machine-readable Social Security cards has alarmed civil libertarians who fear it could lead to a national ID card for all Americans.
    Between this and the real ID, what do they think it is. I remember when this was being proposed. They said that it is optional unless someone wants to change jobs or enter the workforce.
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    4,573
    I know I disagree with several of you on this issue but I just personally don't have a problem with it. I really DO think it would solve more problems than it would create. I understand the argument on the other side as well but there is just NO WAY we are going to stop this INVASION without a NON-COUNTERFEITABLE means of identification that I can see.
    "POWER TENDS TO CORRUPT AND ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY." Sir John Dalberg-Acton

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •