Thread: NAU - It's Time To Revise The Strategy To Secure A Sovereign

It's Time To Revise The Strategy To Secure A Sovereign United States
By Doug Wrenn
Oct 2, 2006 - 9:23:00 PM

Some members of Congress have stated that we must first secure our borders before we can even discuss immigration reform. I part company with some of these folks, because despite their tough talk, their view of immigration reform, even post-border security, still translates into a diluted version of amnesty, and the allowing of "day-workers" to transverse our border, and potentially abuse their privileges. While I disagree with the latter part of that plan, the first part is correct, or at least, it was until recently.

One of the biggest obstacles to real border security and immigration reform has been our forked-tongued president. Now, the motivation for his agenda is exposed, and to regain and preserve any semblance of security and sovereignty, the citizenry of the US, and our elected representatives of government must now revise the now obsolete formula. Border security must no longer be our first priority. Now, we must stop the SPP, or "Security and Prosperity Partnership," dead in its tracks, and right now, while, or even, if, we still can.

The SPP plan, agreed upon in 2005 by the US, Canada and Mexico removes the borders from the three nations in 2010. Article 2, section 2 of our now endangered US Constitution says that the President may only make a treaty with the advice and consent of the Senate, with 2/3 of that body present concurring. For those who do not call SPP a "treaty," but an "agreement," I refer those naysayers to the 2nd College Edition of the American Heritage dictionary, which in part, defines a "treaty" as "A formal agreement between two or more states."

Call SPP what you will, but it is a treaty, [and it has not been officially condoned by the US Senate. The President has usurped the Constitution in violation of his inaugural oath and exceeded his Presidential authority, no precedent for him by any means. Meanwhile, several members of Congress such as Representatives Katherine Harris (R-FL) and Dan Burton (R-IN) are proposing legislation and traveling abroad to help along the President's SPP agenda. The original SPP idea and meeting was held in secret and now we know why.

Kudos to The New American magazine, which dedicated almost an entire issue (October 2nd) to comprehensively exposing the SPP, otherwise known as the North American Union, or NAU.

The New American traces the origins of this idea to Europe in the 1950's, when several countries consolidated their energy resources. It expanded more with so-called free trade treats such as NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) and now regional globalism has been ratcheted up to the North American Union, modeled after the current European Union, with a similar plan in the works for the Middle East. As mentioned in TNA, NAFTA was intended to facilitate the movement of goods. The North American Union, or NAU is designed to move people.

The so-called super-highway, which is one product of the NAU, is in fact, several super-highways in four regions of the US, linking Canada with Mexico via the US.

The folks in Texas were deceived by secret workings of their state government in facilitating part of these highways through that state, while supposedly, 90% of Texans are opposed to the idea. Construction is supposed to begin in 2007.

It has been suggested that the US should chip in $100 billion to Mexico to bolster that nation's infrastructure, while the highways will be constructed by "Spanish," which I presume is inferred to be, Mexican workers.

Eminent domain use and also, abuse, as cited by TNA, which is now legally allowed by the recent and hideous Kelo vs. New London decision in the Supreme Court, will be rampant, as the super-highways will be four football fields long in width, with multiple lanes in each direction reserved solely for tractor trailers, car, and even trains.

A checkpoint will be constructed in Kansas City, Missouri, and will be considered Mexican soil, as if the checkpoint was an embassy.

Crime is also expected to be rampant as the criminal element of Mexico's impoverished citizenry will now have no, rather than limited impediment to crossing into the US.

With the abysmal border security the US already has, approximately 1/3 of our federal prison populations are now full and overflowing with violent felons, who illegally crossed into the US from Mexico. (Keep that in mind the next time some feel-good liberal tells you that the illegal invaders are all good people, just seeking a better life!)

[b]When you push all the scattered pieces of the puzzle together, a very ugly picture is formed. Remember that President Bush has been a zealous proponent, not just of so-called free trade agreements, which have devastated US industry and jobs, but that he has also pushed for "fast-tracking" several of these agreements, thus accelerating and bypassing some of the procedural legislative process, and the intended "checks and balances" built into our three-branch (executive, legislative, judicial) form of our federal government. Consider one small piece of the sage writing of Alexander Hamilton, weighing the complexities of treaty making, shared by the President and the Senate in Federalist # 75, "An avaricious man might be tempted to betray the interests of the state for his own acquisition of wealth. An ambitious man might make his own aggrandizement, by the aid of a foreign power, the price of his treachery to his constituents. The history of human conduct does not warrant that exalted opinion of human virtue which would make it wise in a nation to commit interests of so delicate and momentous kind, as those which concern its intercourse with the rest of the world, to the sole disposal of a magistrate created and circumstanced as would be a President of the United States." Hamilton wrote those words on March 26, 1788. As we now see, in October of 2006, some aspects of human failings never change, but what have we learned since Hamilton's era?

President Bush has not only impeded securing our borders, but arguably even opened them even further by his "wink and nod" policies and agenda, even as our brave and noble Border Security officers are routinely shot at, our desert ecology ruined, property rights of citizens trampled (literally as well as figuratively), unsafe trucks and tainted produce allowed into our country, as well as once eradicated infectious diseases, and terrorists, possibly armed with weapons of mass destruction, from various nations intending the US harm, via our backdoor, and in time of war, no less. What sense does it make to aggressively fight only some of the terrorists and contain them in Afghanistan and Iraq, while their minions can flank our country from across the Rio Grande River? Now, President Bush and his loyal cronies are pushing SPP down our throats. The President's previous mysterious contradictory statements and actions are now mysterious no more. Our northern and southern borders are to be officially erased, as per the SPP agreement in 2010. Any "fence" erected on our southern border with Mexico between now and then is little more than a bone thrown to us dogs. Rest assured, if that fence ever does go up, it will either be taken back down, or be opened in or near 2010, thus wasting even millions more of our precious tax dollars. No one is a stronger advocate of border security than I, but if we do not first defeat the North American Union, any attempt or implemented variation of border security will make about as much sense as screen windows in a submarine. Those of us who advocate for border security and immigration reform must retool our message and efforts and first kill the SPP idea, or else, all our liberties, security and sovereignty will be lost, and all of our efforts, ultimately wasted. This fight is about our survival, both individually as citizens, and collectively, as a nation. It is a fight too important to lose, of even take lightly.

Look at what currently exists around us to see what may happen here in the NAU. Forget about your 2nd Amendment rights to protect yourself. Guns have already been confiscated in Canada.

In Mexico, it is even illegal to possess a bullet.

Free speech, of the possibly soon to be extinct 1st Amendment, will be gone.

In Canada, gay marriage is protected, and decrying the practice of homosexuality is now considered a hate crime.

The Mexican government is rife with corruption, police brutality, and bought and paid for judges. True due process of law exists only on paper, and seldom in practice.

The European Union bristles at officially recognizing God, which shows what the corrosive "separation of church and state" crowd can accomplish when completely unconstrained in our society. T

The amorality and increasing depravity ongoing in Europe also shows what tainted fruits that rotten tree of amoral secularism produces.

In the NAU, our military may be multi-national, like UN troops. Like with most other matters, the US will only have one of three votes over military matters, yet we will also have to help defend Canada and Mexico.

Clearly, on many issues, the US disagrees with Canada and Mexico, but our will values and our will be grossly weakened in a NAU. Supposedly, while US troops fight abroad, Mexican troops will be in charge of securing our newly expanded "homeland." In the end, our Constitution will have as much strength and significance as one-ply toilet tissue.

What harmonious cohesiveness really exists in any regional government? Regionalized health and school districts on the local level in the US are often prone to infighting. Members of the European Union (EU) nations have also had several squabbles. In the US, much of that natural infighting is alleviated by the 10th Amendment, which recognizes states rights beyond the scope of a centralized federal government. I doubt such an effective provision will exist to the same extent, if any, in a multi-national North American Union.

The NAU, an integral part of the one-world order mentality is prophesied in part in the Bible, specifically, Revelation, Chapter 17. That chapter, while written in symbolism, speaks of regionalized "kings, - or leaders, who, - are of one mind and give over their power to the beast" (Verse 13).

The NAU will also give cause for the issuance of national ID cards, as already provided in the REAL ID Act, signed into law by President Bush. The national ID cards will contain a microchip of information, including, but not limited to, medical issues, personal data, a record of purchases, etc. One question that once plagued me was, "Why do I, as a born American citizen, need to have a national ID? The legal immigrants should have a national ID and the illegal immigrants should simply be deported." That question has now been answered. Once the NAU is up and going, those once illegal immigrants will no longer be "illegal," and as pointed out in TNA, "Americans" will now be "North Americans."

Meanwhile, Big Brother will know everything about us, from that gallon of milk we bought at the grocery store yesterday, to the mole on our left cheek. And the allegedly "secure" ID cards are already believed to be easy prey to hackers, and predictions are that ID theft will dramatically worsen to epidemic proportions.

Our taxes will also escalate to astronomical heights, as the US will fund much, if not most of this multi-national nightmare. Just think, as we get fleeced, if not oppressed, we even get to pay for the privilege. Considering the increasing insurmountable tax burden our nation now faces with increased socialist government entitlement programs, not to mention an $820 billion unfunded Medicare prescription mandate (another Bush brainstorm), just add to that already blazing fire, more fuel, in the form of the additions of socialist-minded Canadians and impoverished Mexicans, and all with extended palms, all facing in the up and open position.

Bear in mind also, that China could supposedly well surpass the US in being the top dog on the global market in about 20 years, and will then be able to call in our owed debt. That move in itself could possibly collapse, if not severely damage our economy, without our Panda-hugging "strategic partner" ever having to even fire a shot. Government entitlement programs, much like Herpes, are forever. [b]The added stress and burden to our economy from the NAU could very well be the final nail in the coffin, once known as the United States.[/b

While the NAU seems like a good deal for Canada, and particularly for Mexico, it also appears to be the beginning of the end for the US, and ironically, the US, at least, on the surface, looks to be the country chiefly propelling this suicidal madness.

Globalism is like communism, in that it subtly and stealthily permeates and burrows into a government, first not with guns and bullets, but with handshakes and smiles, and then grows to menacing power from within. Like hypertension, it is indeed, a "silent killer." The permeating of globalism into the US government not only exists, but also prospers on both sides of the partisan aisle, and in many back-room deals within the allegedly hallowed halls of our nation's Capitol. Our government created the NAU.

Our citizens only contributed to the creation of the NAU by not paying attention, and by focusing their attention on such significantly more weighty matters as sports, reality TV and pornography, all vast wastelands and repositories for thought, intelligence and awareness.

Our national apathy must end now. Conservatives proved that President Bush could not have his way with the Supreme Court, and appoint an under qualified, if not unqualified hack, such as Harriet Miers.

The American people from both major political parties rose in vehement unison once again regarding the Dubai World Ports deal. We all must unify, rise, and rally once again, this time, to stop the SPP, also known as the NAU, or else, it will mean the E-N-D of the U.S.A.

http://www.magic-city-news.com/Doug_Wre ... 6737.shtml

Moving to News Section