Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,432

    ICE Director: Agents Risk ‘Termination’ For Not Enforcing Obama’s Immigration Policy

    April 14, 2015 - 4:04 PM
    By Brittany M. Hughes

    (CNSNews.com) -- Sarah Saldana, director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), told members of the House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday that ICE agents who do not enforce President Barack Obama’s immigration priorities, outline in a Nov. 20 DHS memo, could be fired for not following an agency directive.

    During a hearing on ICE oversight on April 14, Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) referred to Obama’s statement during a town hall event in February, during which the President said there would be “consequences” for ICE agents who enforce federal immigration laws outside of his mandated enforcement priorities.

    Representative Franks then asked Saldana what those consequences would be.

    “The president also said, and I know this question was proffered earlier, if somebody’s working for ICE and they don’t follow this policy, there’s going to be consequences for it,” Franks explained. “Have you enforced that? I mean is there, are there consequences for not following that policy?”

    “There are consequences for not following the rule of the employee’s status with the agency. I have a whole manual on that -- ” Saldana said before being cut off.

    “What would the consequences be if someone in the position that required them to follow through with the president’s directives -- and again we’ll set the constitutional issue aside for the moment, if the president’s done that then I guess we can do that – what would be the consequences for doing that?” Franks pressed.

    “Well, whether it’s that directive, or assaulting an employee in the office, or not abiding by some other rule or policy, the range of punishment can range from anything to a verbal meeting, where you counsel that person, to ultimately what’s available to any employer and that’s termination,” Saldana said.

    “So, in other words, there are employees that work with you that are subject, or potentially subjected to termination for not following the president’s directive in this particular case?” Rep. Franks asked.

    “For not following any policy or directive or rule of employment,” Saldana agreed.

    “Which includes the president’s directive. All right, I understand,” Franks concluded. Saldana did not argue.

    Speaking at an immigration town hall event at Florida International University on Feb. 25, Obama defended his unilateral immigration policies that “focus on felons,” not “families.”

    “We are now implementing a new prioritization,” Obama explained. “There are going to be some jurisdictions, and there may be individual ICE officials or Border Patrol who aren’t paying attention to our new directives. But they’re going to be answerable to the head of the Department of Homeland Security, because he’s been very clear about what our priorities should be. And I’ve been very clear about what our priorities should be.”

    “The bottom line is, is that if somebody is working for ICE and there is a policy and they don’t follow the policy, there are going to be consequences to it,” he added.


    In this March 2, 2015 photo, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer "tacs up" in the garage of a New York federal building, as he prepares for series of early-morning arrests. Immigrant and Customs Enforcement say an increasing number of cities and counties across the United States are limiting cooperation with the agency and putting its officers in dangerous situations as they track down foreign-born criminals. Instead, more of its force is out on the streets, eating up resources and conducting investigations because cities like New York and states like California have passed legislation that limits many of the detention requests issued by immigration authorities. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)

    Saldana also explained at the hearing Tuesday that all ICE agents are required to carry cards that lay out ICE’s immigration enforcement priorities, which group illegal aliens deemed eligible for deportation into three ranking categories. Priority 1 includes aliens who threaten national security, border security and public safety; Priority 2 includes aliens convicted of three or more misdemeanor offenses or a "significant misdemeanor," as well as recent border-jumpers; and Priority 3 involves aliens who have been issued a final order of removal on or after Jan. 1, 2014.

    "We have actually put out real substantial training on this, sir," Saldana told Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), holding up a card she said she carries herself. "And every officer uses one of these cards, which clearly outlines those priorities."

    "And quite frankly, I carry it myself -- and try to make sure that each of these priorities...the first one is outlined on the front, the second and third priorities on the back," she said. "Again, trying to make an effort to clarify for law enforcement where our priorities should be."

    Saldana said she has directed her staff to raise any questions about the Obama administration's immigration priorities up the chain of command.

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...orcing-obama-s
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member vistalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    3,036
    Homelessness is increasing among American children, and there are approximately 60,000 foster children in California alone. Not one word about any of these kids from the narcissistic hustler for whom "truth" is whatever will get him what he wants on any given day.
    **********************************
    Americans first in this magnificent country

    American jobs for American workers

    Fair trade, not free trade

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    3,185
    OK, what is missing in my education? My sense strongly suggests to me that anyone border crossing illegally has threatened border security, and very often public safety

    How many hearings does Congress need to conduct to reach a decision that just includes common sense? They did not ask my question? Yes or no?

    Voters, these people in Congress reflect upon us, we elected them!

Similar Threads

  1. Immigration agents sue to stop Obama’s non-deportation policy
    By Ratbstard in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-31-2013, 06:43 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-25-2013, 11:17 PM
  3. Should ICE agents be punished for enforcing immigration laws?
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-16-2012, 12:45 PM
  4. ICE agents slam Obama immigration policy
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-29-2011, 12:54 PM
  5. The Termination: Obama-Soros Care 'Involuntary euthanasia
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-25-2009, 07:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •