Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,137

    Immigrants' suit could be costly

    Our constitution does not apply to people in this Country, plain and simple!


    http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll ... /707150392
    Sunday, 07/15/07


    Immigrants' suit could be costly
    Lawyers say Maury, U.S. may face 6-digit figure for damages, fees

    By COLBY SLEDGE
    Staff Writer

    Columbia resident Heather Ufelton thinks it's more than a little ridiculous that Latino illegal immigration suspects are suing the Maury County Sheriff's Office and the federal government for arresting them in their homes.

    "I think it's retarded that illegal immigrants can sit there and sue when they're not even American citizens," said Ufelton, a manager at Scot Market on Nashville Highway, where she said many customers are Hispanic. "But I guess this is America, and you can sue anybody."



    As it turns out, Midstate lawyers say the 11 immigrants who filed suit last week not only have the right to sue, they may actually have a case that could end up costing Maury County and the federal government hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages and legal fees.

    Rights questioned

    The plaintiffs were arrested July 3 after Maury County deputies and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials raided a Columbia mobile home park looking for a man accused of raping a 15-year-old girl.

    While searching for the suspect, officers went to several homes and arrested 18 people they said were in the country illegally. Maury County Sheriff Enoch George said residents pointed the officers to the homes during the pursuit.

    "Every time they would go one place and he wouldn't be there, (the residents) would say, 'He might be at another place,' " George said.

    The immigrants, who remain in federal custody, allege in the lawsuit that agents entered their homes without search warrants, violating their rights under the U.S. Constitution.

    "Constitutional rights are your baseline: They're your bare minimum rights," said Nashville immigration lawyer Philip Perez, who is not affiliated with the lawsuit. "States cannot reduce constitutionally granted rights."

    Constitutional rights have previously been upheld for illegal immigrants: In 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Texas could not withhold state school funds from children who were not in the country legally.

    In its ruling of Plyler v. Doe, the high court held that the children were protected under the law by the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, and that the protection "extends to anyone, citizen or stranger."

    Searches under scrutiny

    Under federal law, immigration officers cannot enter a house unless they have a warrant or the permission of someone in the house.

    Federal immigration spokesman Temple Black said he could not comment on pending litigation, but he said the deputies and agents could enter a house if they had reason to believe the suspect was inside.

    That would not have applied in this instance, said Williamson County attorney John D. Schwalb, because the officers did not witness the man enter the home. Schwalb is not involved in the case.

    "If that's the situation, you knock on the … door and you place officers at the back doors" while awaiting a warrant, Schwalb said. "Somebody better have seen someone enter one of the other trailers."

    Even if the Constitution's protection did not extend to illegal immigrants, the officers would not have known whether the people inside were in the country legally, said lawyer Ernie Williams, a former U.S. attorney in Nashville.

    "At that moment in time, (federal agents) don't know if these people in the trailer are legal or not," said Williams, now a criminal defense attorney in Franklin. "The proper thing to do would be to make sure nobody leaves until they get search warrants."

    Payout could be huge

    In addition to seeking an end to future warrantless searches and seizures of illegal immigrants, the lawsuit asks for $100 for each day that each immigrant is incarcerated.

    All of the immigrants are being held without bond, but Nashville attorney Elliott Ozment, who represents the plaintiffs, said he was working to get the court to reconsider and set bond amounts.

    "Once they make bond, they're free to come back and continue to live as they were living," Ozment said. That process could take two weeks.

    Even then, each plaintiff could be required to come up with roughly $6,500 in bond money, Ozment said, though he plans to appeal if the bonds are set that high.

    Case could take years

    Battling such cases in federal court has been known to take years. If the immigrants remain in jail just through the end of 2007, and the judge agrees to award the requested damages, each immigrant would receive approximately $18,000.

    That amount could rise as the plaintiffs' lawyers square off with Maury County and the federal government over payment of legal fees.

    "Most of the time they make plaintiff attorneys work hard for the fees," Ozment said. "I anticipate that if this drags on, that could be an issue."


    Tennessean.com and its related sites are pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the Internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting. Since Tennessean.com does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our Web site. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not Tennessean.com or its related sites.
    Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    70

    Immigrants suit could be costly

    Why can't (or won't) people countersue these illegal aliens for breaking our laws and send them packing?

  3. #3
    Senior Member redbadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The United States Of Invasion
    Posts
    3,005
    excellent idea
    Never look at another flag. Remember, that behind Government, there is your country, and that you belong to her as you do belong to your own mother. Stand by her as you would stand by your own mother

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    There is a law firm suing Tyson's and MOhawk carpeting for hiring illegals over Americans -

    Maybe we could get them to take on the federal government - or maybe the government of Mexico for us.

    Just think if we could get a large law firm to agree, maybe we could all volunteer to do some of the work for them. If that would be possible - geographically speaking.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    How about we go for the big fish. Let's sue mexico for neglect of its people, and promoting the breaking of our laws.
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •