Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Immigration costs more than thought

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opi ... 446.column

    Peter A. Brown

    Immigration costs more than thought
    Published October 14, 2005

    In the emotional debate over immigrants, there has always been an ambiguity about whether they are a financial burden or bonanza.

    But now, a renowned University of Florida economist who is admittedly pro-immigration in his personal politics has found that its net financial cost to taxpayers is much larger than anyone had been able to quantify previously.

    UF economist David Denslow found a net cost of $1,800 per year to the state per immigrant family, which will provide ammunition for the anti-immigration folks.

    Denslow's academic credentials and political track record add credibility to the finding. He is a distinguished service professor, a registered Democrat who voted for President Bush in 2000 but against him in 2004, and was an adviser to Republican Gov. Bob Martinez in the 1980s.

    He crunched the numbers and found in Florida each immigrant household costs the state roughly $1,800 on a net basis. In other words, $1,800 is the total of how much more public services immigrants consume mostly Medicaid and education and how much less in taxes they pay than does the average resident.

    Although his research and calculations pertain only to Florida, "We would think that would be close to the national figure" for other states, Denslow said.

    The work on the cost of immigrants is a small, until now ignored, item in a much bigger report on the future of the Florida economy commissioned by Florida State University's LeRoy Collins Institute.

    But, its impact on the national immigration-policy debate could be substantial.

    Denslow did not calculate the net amount of federal taxes paid and federal government services consumed by immigrants compared to residents, so the impact on the U.S. Treasury is unknown.

    Because he did not distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants, the $1,800 figure is the average of both.

    But just taking the roughly 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States, and using Denslow's figures, that would come to a cost of about $18 billion annually, slightly more than the entire NASA budget.

    In any case, the information is important to the swirling debate and should spur a serious study of the financial impact on the federal government.

    Denslow guesses the federal government might get a bonus due to his belief that millions of illegal immigrants pay Social Security taxes, but are unlikely to collect benefits.

    In the past, the academic estimates of the financial cost of immigration have been much less precise. There has been a general sense that there are financial pluses and minuses to immigration.

    Proponents argue immigrants are vital to the U.S. economy by providing workers for jobs employers can't fill with native-born Americans, not to mention the emotional argument that virtually all of us have immigrant roots.

    That is why there is such strong support from the business community for a policy like the one suggested by President Bush. It would set up a guest-worker program, but limit the ability of undocumented immigrants to become citizens.

    Those who are against immigration argue that America's borders are too porous, and that the costs of allowing so many people to immigrate will eventually become excessive because they are a drain on publicly provided services.

    It is this argument that gets a boost from Denslow's study.

    Denslow says his estimate of the net cost of immigrants is more accurate than previous ones that showed little financial impact because he did his analysis by family, rather than by individual.

    Previous studies counted the number of individual immigrants in calculating the cost of immigration.

    But that method underestimates the costs of immigration, he said, because it does not take into account the fact that immigrants have children who are born in the United States.

    When one calculates the cost of immigration by individual immigrant, those children, who are U.S. citizens, are not counted. But, these children use government services and will not pay taxes for many years, and if their parents had not immigrated, they would not be in the United States to begin with.

    I, like Denslow, have been an advocate of increased legal immigration while stepping up efforts to find ways to discourage illegals from coming across the border.

    The Denslow study won't necessarily change my position, but it has gotten me rethinking whether my views are realistic given the new numbers.

    Since most everyone has a view of immigration, they might want to re-evaluate their stand to consider this new information, too.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    The government income figure includes all immgrants both those more affluent usually legal and the often less affluent illegals.

    The cost of services per person between the two extremes is not that different. The US gets a net individual financial benefit from the more affluent legal immigrant taxpayers and they lose on the cost of services delivered illegal immigrants.
    The illegal immigrants tend to be less skilled, make less in income and thus pay less in taxes and often being off the books none at all.

    That is a major part of why our policy discourages them. Any nation's immigration policy is supposed to be for the benefit of its citizens not it's immigrants.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Erin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    11

    Erin

    I'm a citizen of Texas facing the many problems that California and other states bordering ours is facing and that is illegal immigrants. People claim it's racism. it's not. It's more likely that it is racism on people who blame that reason every time something goes worng and offends them in anyway. It's always racism. NO! it's what is right. It is what Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.s. Code has said but was ignored. Illegal immigration is illegal. I do have other questions which are Can i have 3 top good reasons to help with an essay i am doing about illegal immigration in America and how it is affecting our economy? Also America can do the jobs that illegal immigrants do, we just never get the chance to sign up first. They are to busy crossing the borders.

  4. #4
    Senior Member LegalUSCitizen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    10,934
    Hi Erin, welcome to ALIPAC. If you have an essay to do on illegal immigration and anything to do with it than you are at the National Archives Library on Illegal Immigration right here !! Start reading and start writing !!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •