Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,457

    Senate plan for immigration fix up in air

    Senate plan for immigration fix up in air
    Democrats ready to move forward, but GOP says the talks need time

    By MICHELLE MITTELSTADT
    Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau
    May 9, 2007, 10:21AM

    WASHINGTON — Staring down a deadline to make a deal on immigration, Republican and Democratic senators skirmished Tuesday over how to reach their goal of a comprehensive fix of the issue.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., insisted Tuesday that the Senate will begin a two-week immigration policy debate next week even though the bipartisan team scrambling to achieve a deal with the White House has yet to do so — and appears increasingly unlikely to finish its work in the coming days.

    "They've had ample time to come up with some type of an alternative," Reid said.

    If no deal is struck, he said, he intends to bring up the immigration bill approved by senators last year. If an agreement is reached, it could be substituted for the old bill.

    But Republicans criticized the Democrat's insistence on going forward, saying Reid should give the bipartisan negotiators more time to develop a bill palatable both to immigrants' allies and those who favor strong enforcement of laws against illegal immigration.

    The Senate Judiciary Committee's top Republican threatened obstruction if Reid re-introduces the bill passed by the Senate last year.

    "There may be a filibuster there," Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said Tuesday.

    Talks to revive old bill
    Other Republicans didn't go quite as far but made clear that if their only choice is to vote on last year's legislation, even its GOP authors will vote against it.

    "There is no use going to a bill that will not carry the day," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. "The only thing that will solve immigration, fix the problem, would be a bipartisan new bill."

    Last year's bill is a non-starter for many Republicans in part because it is viewed as more lenient than the proposals under discussion.

    Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, among the senators engaged in marathon, closed-door talks for two months with White House emissaries, urged Reid to back off his plan.

    "The talks are not there yet," the Texas Republican said. "This is a very complicated subject, and if it takes a little more time to get something where we know what the consequences would be, I think we should take more time."

    Said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.: "This is far too important to have what is, in effect, an artificial deadline kill the bill."

    Graham said he was cautiously optimistic that a deal could be reached, but others engaged in the talks were more pessimistic. Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., assessed the chances as "less than 50-50."

    The senators, reluctant to publicly discuss their negotiations, have reached tentative agreement on a plan to give the nation's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants a chance to eventually become citizens.

    In a concession to Republicans, legalization wouldn't begin until the government meets goals such as the hiring of more Border Patrol agents and creation of a tamper-resistant identification document.

    Illegal immigrants would have to wait up to 13 years to gain legal status under the compromise, which has yet to determine the size of the fines they would pay or whether they'd have to return to their home country to apply.

    The negotiators also have reached agreement on creation of a temporary worker program, allocating 400,000 visas annually for foreigners to work in the United States.

    Contentious issue
    Among the biggest sticking points: Whether to reduce the legal immigration system's decades-old focus on family reunification in favor of a GOP-backed model of bringing in immigrants with essential skills and education.

    Such a move would be opposed by immigrant-rights groups, the Catholic Church and others who insist family reunification should remain central to U.S. immigration policy.

    The House has largely been on the sidelines in the immigration debate, awaiting Senate action before taking up its own legislation.

    Several conservative Republicans joined by one Democrat, Heath Shuler of North Carolina, cautioned the Senate Tuesday against approving what they termed "mass amnesty on an unprecedented scale."

    Illegal immigrants should be deported, not placed on a path to eventual citizenship, said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-San Antonio.

    "Some even want to sell citizenships to lawbreakers to the price of a fine. And I would oppose that," said Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.

  2. #2
    JAK
    JAK is offline
    Senior Member JAK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    5,226
    These people knew it was illegal to cross our borders when they did so. They don't have to be separated from their family. TAKE THEM WITH YOU!!

    NO AMNESTY! NO GUESTWORKER!! ENFORCE OUR EXISTING IMMIGRATION LAWS!! HEAVILY PUNISH EMPLOYERS. ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT TO HAVE THEM SELF DEPORT!!!

    ASAP!
    Please help save America for our children and grandchildren... they are counting on us. THEY DESERVE the goodness of AMERICA not to be given to those who are stealing our children's future! ... and a congress who works for THEM!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member pjr40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Redlands, California
    Posts
    1,596
    I wouldn't be surprised if the pinheads in congress wind up without passing any type of immigration bill.
    <div>Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress; but I repeat myself. Mark Twain</div>

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •