Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675

    Kennedy-McCain Amnesty Falls Flat

    http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article ... 1758.shtml -

    Kennedy-McCain Amnesty Plan Falls Flat
    Christopher Ruddy
    Thursday, Jan. 25, 2007




    Legislation now being drafted by lawmakers — primarily Sens. Ted Kennedy and John McCain — would allow millions of illegal immigrants in the United States to apply for citizenship.

    Adoption of this measure would be a terrible mistake.

    The Senate plans to introduce its immigration bill early this year, with the House considering its version later. President Bush has said he hopes to sign an immigration bill in 2007.

    In 2006 the Senate passed a bill that would have required illegal immigrants living in the United States for fewer than five years to return to their native countries for a period of time before applying for legal status.

    House Republicans prevented debate of the bill, saying it was an amnesty bill, pure and simple, for lawbreakers. Today, the Kennedy-McCain legislation under consideration would go dramatically further. The new law would allow up to 11 million illegal immigrants now living in the United States to gain citizenship after applying, and without ever returning home first.

    McCain's backing of the amnesty measure undercuts his claim of representing conservative voters as he seeks the GOP presidential primaries in 2008. But the worst part about the proposed Kennedy-McCain bill is the crystal-clear message it sends to wannabe illegals around the globe: Come here, America will cave, and eventually you will be granted citizenship.

    Let's remember the amnesty concept was tried before. In 1986 President Reagan signed into law the Immigration Reform and Control Act, passed by a Democratic Congress, that granted legal residency to 2.7 million illegal aliens already in the United States and set penalties for employers who knowingly hire illegals. At the time, the view was, amnesty would be coupled with promises of future immigration controls. More than 20 years later, it clearly did not work.





    For example, the federal government never followed through on its promise to crack down on employers. Illegal immigration actually accelerated after the legislation was passed.

    The significant issue is not whether amnesty should be granted. The first and primary issue Americans want solved is a system of sane immigration and secure borders. Despite huge expenditures of money and manpower, our borders remain porous. Despite 9/11 and billions spent on homeland security, terrorists can still easily enter the country. The House took a step forward and approved a plan to build 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. But Congress has not appropriated funds for its construction.

    It is also important to remember secure "borders" today means our airports too.

    Amazingly, between one-quarter and nearly one-half of the illegal immigrants in the United States today didn't sneak across the border with Mexico. They simply arrived here with a legal visa and stayed on after it expired — as did several of the 9/11 terrorists.

    Only after the United States gets a firm grip on border control should Congress even consider an amnesty program. And once the borders are secure, I believe we should increase legal immigration. America needs immigrants. We should open our doors to the best and brightest from every continent rather than primarily from just one region.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member LegalUSCitizen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    10,934
    YES.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member sippy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Posts
    3,798
    Can you imagine the circus that will come about when Congressman Tancredo brings out mccain's support for amnesty, etc.?

    Mccain would be wise to stay home during these debates with Tom or Duncan.
    "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results is the definition of insanity. " Albert Einstein.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Beckyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,900

    Amnesty NO! Increase immigration - NO!

    We don't need to increase our immigration. We have 300M people in the USA. It is almost impossible to find land for sale in our country. Our infrastructure is overtaxed, our highways are crowded and in need of repair, our water systems need updating, our electrical systems are overworked, etc, etc. Until we update our infrastructure and determine who is America we should not be debating anything except how fast can we secure our borders.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    2,457
    We don't need to increase our immigration. We have 300M people in the USA. It is almost impossible to find land for sale in our country. Our infrastructure is overtaxed, our highways are crowded and in need of repair, our water systems need updating, our electrical systems are overworked, etc, etc. Until we update our infrastructure and determine who is America we should not be debating anything except how fast can we secure our borders.
    I totally agree Beckyal! Any politician who actually thinks we need to increase immigration with a population of >300 million, well on its way to 400 million, is brain-dead and should be run out of office.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •