Thread: Kobach Pushes All States to Adopt Voter ID Laws

by KEN KLUKOWSKI
13 Aug 2016
Denver, CO

DENVER, Colorado—Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach in Colorado on Saturday was pushing states to adopt the Secure and Fair Elections (“SAFE”) Act, model legislation he wrote to prevent vote fraud by requiring voter identification and proof of citizenship.

Kobach is a rising star among conservatives, many of whom would like to see him tapped by Donald Trump to be U.S. attorney general in a Trump administration. A former Justice Department attorney under Attorney General John Ashcroft in the Bush 43 administration, Kobach has made a national name for himself as one of the leading advocates of securing the ballot box against fraud, and also as the author of key provisions making the 2016 GOP Platform the most conservative in modern history, on issues ranging from the border wall, to traditional marriage, to the Supreme Court.

The Republican National Lawyers Association (RNLA) held a national election law seminar in Denver on Friday and Saturday, and the American Civil Rights Union (ACRU) convened an invitation-only event alongside RNLA’s seminar, featuring several secretaries of state, chief election officers, Republican former and current federal elections officials, and constitutional lawyers, to explore strategies to protect against voter fraud. Kobach spoke at both events.

During the ACRU event, Kobach touted his SAFE Act, which was designed to require proof of U.S. citizenship and proof of identity in a manner fulfilling the requirements the U.S. Supreme Court has held are consistent with the Constitution. It is model legislation for states to adopt as part of their election laws, rather than a federal law, since the Constitution entrusts the sovereign states with primary responsibility for holding elections.

The SAFE Act authorizes as “qualifying identification” to vote current photo IDs (or also expired IDs for voters over age 65) that are:

*a driver’s license issued by any state or district of the United States;
*a state identification card issued by any state or district of the United States;
*a concealed carry [firearm] license … issued by any state or district of the United States;
*a United States passport;
*an employee badge or identification document issued by a municipal, county, state, or federal government office or agency of the United States;
*a military identification document issued by the United States;
*a student identification card issued by a public postsecondary institution of education; or
*a public assistance identification card issued by a municipal, county, state, or federal government office or agency of the United States.

The SAFE Act also makes exceptions, allowances, and accommodations for military personnel and their families, for people with special medical disabilities, and for individuals whose religious beliefs prohibit them from taking photographs.

Speaking exclusively with Breitbart News in Denver at the ACRU event, Kobach said, “Every time an alien votes, it cancels out the vote of a United States citizen. This is a nationwide problem.”

“Every state needs to address it and take steps to secure the most fundamental privilege of citizenship—the vote,” he added.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...voter-id-laws/

I just don't understand how having a voter ID law can be unconstitutional. I just don't get that at all. Where does this idea come from? If you can't afford a voter ID, then the state will pay for it. If you're infirmed, then provisions need to be made to have a portable ID van go around to hospitals, homes, nursing care facilities and take photos. Without a voter ID how can you verify what district they're supposed to vote in and what polling place they're supposed to go to? How can those infirmed apply for absentee ballots if they're not registered? How can you be registered without at some point presenting a voter ID of some type?!

These laws are good laws. They protect our democracy from fraud and rigged elections. They also have provisional ballots to sort things out over time for honest, legitimate issues.

These Judges that are throwing out voter ID laws are biased and need to be investigated. These rulings may be okay in some states where they haven't made proper provisions for all the legitimate issues, but to just throw so many out this year before the election, that just doesn't sound right to me at all.