Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    KS: Immigration tricky in Kansas too, especially for GOP

    Analysis: Immigration tricky in Kansas too, especially for GOP
    Mar 2, 2008

    — The Associated Press
    TOPEKA, Kan. — Legislators feel pushed to attack illegal immigration because the federal government hasn’t done enough about it to satisfy many of their constituents.
    Yet, at the same time, they’re discovering why the issue seems impossible for the president and Congress to resolve. Immigration bills before the Legislature have generated strong opposition from a coalition of powerful business groups.
    The clear conundrum, especially for the Republicans who have majorities in both chambers, is whether to side with powerful groups in the business sector or with voters whose anger could cost lawmakers their political jobs.
    Business opposition tells legislators that in the world of politics, sometimes the best action is no action. But because of how many voters feel, that isn’t an easy option.
    “It makes it a struggle. They can’t please two constituencies,â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Populist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,085
    We have to keep the pressure on to defeat the cheap labor, traiterous businesses (not the honest businesses), so the will of "ordinary" voters is reflected and tough anti-illegal alien bills are signed into law.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074
    The clear conundrum, especially for the Republicans who have majorities in both chambers, is whether to side with powerful groups in the business sector or with voters whose anger could cost lawmakers their political jobs.
    money vs majority

    The Constitution was written to protect and give rights to 'we the people', persons, and citizens.
    No where have I read the Constitution grants a single right or protection to any 'business', 'corporation', 'farmer', 'packing plant' etc.

    Legislators are bound by law to uphold their oath of office and respresent the people. This legislator serves the people.

    Satisfying a coalition of powerful business groups hints to the voters the legislature is possibly self-serving and raises the question what, if anything, does he receive in return? This legislator self-serves by catering to big business.

    Gettysburg Address........."that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain, that this nation under God shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth."
    Abraham Lincoln
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •