Thread: L.A. civil rights attorney files claims over federal immigra

L.A. civil rights attorney files claims over federal immigration raid
Peter Schey's legal action seeks damages for employees caught up in Van Nuys workplace immigration enforcement action.

By Anna Gorman, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
April 25, 2008


A longtime Los Angeles civil rights attorney is trying a new strategy to push federal immigration authorities to change the way they conduct workplace raids.

Peter Schey filed 114 federal claims for damages late Thursday on behalf of U.S. citizens and permanent residents who were temporarily detained during a recent raid at Micro Solutions Enterprises in Van Nuys.

On Feb. 7, armed Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents went into the company, blocked the exits and prevented all the employees from leaving while they carried out federal arrest warrants for eight people and a search warrant as part of an ongoing criminal investigation. Those eight were arrested on criminal charges and 130 others were arrested on immigration violations.

Schey said immigration authorities treated U.S. citizens and green card holders like suspected criminals without any reason to believe they had broken the law.

"That group detention is completely unconstitutional," said Schey, head of the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law in Los Angeles. "They have no individual probable cause, yet they come in like the Gestapo."

Immigration authorities said the warrants were signed by a U.S. magistrate judge, and the search warrant was issued based on the "likelihood that evidence of criminal violations would be found at the location."

"The search was properly conducted in accordance with the warrant, federal rules of criminal procedure and ICE policies," ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said in a written statement.

Carl Shusterman, a private immigration attorney, said he had not seen the claims but that ICE's changing its practices seemed like "sort of a long shot."

"How can they possibly sort out the legal and illegal employees without questioning them?" he said. "How could they conduct these raids at all if they didn't hold people at least a little while?"

But John Ayala, Southern California chapter chairman of the American Immigration Lawyers Assn., said he believed the claims would force ICE to follow the letter of the law when conducting enforcement actions.

"It's very important to remind ICE and Department of Homeland Security that the Constitution is at play and people have rights," Ayala said. "They should go in there looking for those eight workers. They shouldn't go in there on a fishing expedition."

The 114 legal workers, including Clare Cox, are each seeking $5,000 in damages.

Cox, a U.S. citizen, said she heard the agents before she saw them. Without identifying themselves, the agents told everyone to line up against the wall, she said. For about 35 to 40 minutes, Cox said, she was prohibited from leaving.

"I felt like we were being arrested," said Cox, who distributes inventory at the company. "I felt like we had no rights."

Cox said immigration authorities could have handled the arrests in a more diplomatic and less theatrical way.

"I believe in immigration laws. I believe in everyone being documented," she said. "I don't believe in these scare tactics."

Mike Whitehead, also born in the United States, said he was detained for about 45 minutes and had to answer a few questions and show his identification before being let go. The whole experience was scary and intimidating, he said.

"It was degrading. I was born in this country," said Whitehead, a sales representative for Micro Solutions. "It could have been handled completely differently. It could have been handled with dignity."

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 1241.story

They want to RAPE us with dignity...nice!

Schey said immigration authorities treated U.S. citizens and green card holders like suspected criminals without any reason to believe they had broken the law.

When dealing with great numbers of people, it takes time to sort things out. Were these people abused--no. But they were in the company of illegal aliens....sue the company for putting them in that situation, not ICE for enforcing the law.


If a vehicle is stopped because the driver ran a stop light, the idenity of all passengers is checked and they are questioned.

Having citizens and legal residents detained PROVES ICE was not racially profiling and treating all equally.

The citizens may or not may be 'innocent'. How many were aware they were working along side illegal immigrants and failed to report it? Are they accessories? Did they aid and abet the illegal aliens?

Have seen pictures of students leaving a school during shootings--all are instructed to leave with their hands over their heads for police and public safety. Did the kids complaint they were treated like 'criminals'--no. The police have no way of knowing who may be a threat.

Having citizens and legal residents detained PROVES ICE was not racially profiling and treating all equally.

You said it all MyAmerica. When a crime is committed, there is usually a lockdown and no one gets out without being checked out. ICE found 138 criminals, so they did their jobs. If they had announced the raid, those 138 would've taken off, so this argument doesn't hold water.

I don't see anything wrong with racial profiling, I mean what's the point of giving a criminals description otherwise? Be on the lookout for a tall, white man with blue eyes means looking for anyone matching that description, no? Wouldn't do any good to leave out his race or gender now would it?

Claim: “Illegal immigrants are being denied their civil rightsâ€