Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006

    La Raza In Line To Pocket Reform-Bill Slush Funds

    Posted 07/17/2013 06:21 PM ET

    The fingerprints of Cecilia Munoz, now the White House's top staffer on immigration, but formerly policy director at the National Council of La Raza, are all over the Senate's reform bill. Getty Images

    The avowed purpose of the immigration bill passed by the Senate and pending in the House is to provide a "path to citizenship" for the illegal immigrants in exchange for tough new enforcement measures that would prevent other such incursions in the future.

    But buried deep within the immigration bill are hidden multimillion-dollar slush funds for left-wing nonprofit groups to provide services to the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants now in the U.S. Once enacted, the slush funds would total almost $300 million over three years and grow over time.

    Reviewing the massive legislation, it's obvious that lawyering would be needed. The 1,100-page proposal is a network of legal requirements and protections, waivers and exceptions, including a new "provisional immigrant" or "blue card" status (the first phase of legalization for illegals), appeals of adverse rulings, stays of deportation, applications for work visas, and countless other such guarantees.

    Within this thicket of new rights are features that would vastly increase the flow of immigrants to perhaps 30 million or 40 million over the next decade. One is a set of "chain immigration" clauses, legalizing the spouses and children of illegals.

    Another is the Dream Act, fast-tracking legal status for aliens of any age who came here before they were 16 (how this would be proved is not clear). A third is a "blue card" temporary visa that could be converted to permanent status and used by future illegals to get legal in a hurry.

    Of course, a Spanish-speaking immigrant would likely know nothing of this maze of loopholes, benefits and protections and would on his own be unable to exploit them. So the bill sets up a fund of $50 million to aid illegals seeking "provisional" status, filing appeals, blocking efforts at deportation, obtaining naturalization, and so on.

    The groups receiving the $50 million to give such assistance would be nonprofit "immigrant- serving" organizations whose staffs have "demonstrated qualifications, experience and expertise in providing quality services to immigrants." Agents of such groups would be paid by the government to guide the illegals through the intricate processes in the legislation.

    'Chock-Full' Of Pork

    The bill provides a sizable slush fund for leftward groups in the immigrant serving, advocacy and lobbying business. As Sen. John Cornyn, R-Tex., puts it, the bill is "chock-full of de facto earmarks, pork barrel spending, and special interest sweeteners."

    Though the nonprofit agencies getting the money aren't named in the bill, their identities can be deduced from the history and politics of the issue.

    Foremost among such groups is the National Council of La Raza (meaning "the race," or alternatively, "the people"), a group that opposes current U.S. immigration laws, defends illegals, and long promoted amnesty measures. It's also an organization with significant leverage at the Obama White House and its former senior executive helped draft the Senate bill.

    La Raza is already a recipient of federal grants and contracts — running at $8 million to $10 million per year — and would arguably be at the head of the line to receive new funding.

    A second, allied group, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, says it receives no federal money but would likely qualify for subsidies under this legislation.

    Laundry List Of Services

    As to the services to be provided by such groups, the legislation lists:

    • Supplying information to illegals and the public on "the eligibility and benefits of registered provisional immigrant status."

    • Completing application forms and petitions for immigrants, obtaining documents and other relevant data.

    • "Applying for any waivers" from restrictions on illegals and qualifying family members.

    • Helping individuals seeking to "adjust their status" to permanent residence.

    • "Applying for United States citizenship ..."

    Among the features of the bill in terms of immigration enforcement are provisos concerning drunken driving in the U.S. Two prior convictions for this offense would not disqualify an immigrant for legalization, but a third offense, after the bill is passed, may disqualify a migrant from becoming a citizen.

    Similar rules apply to counterfeiting or altering passports: three such instances are forbidden, meaning two would be permitted. As to selling or forging materials used in making passports, the bill says 10 such instances are verboten, that nine won't be a problem.

    Another provision would protect aliens who have been "ordered excluded, deported or removed" from the country. Such aliens, under the bill, "may apply for registered provisional status," and, by this one step, avoid removal.

    Pending approval of their applications, the aliens "shall not be considered unlawfully present" unless the Secretary of Homeland Security says so. This is unlikely, at best.

    The secretary, or an immigration judge, could stop deportation of illegals on humanitarian or family-unity grounds or simply in "the public interest" if they decide to do so. "Public interest" is essentially undefined in the legislation.

    Litigation Explosion

    As noted by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., "such open-ended waivers could all but ensure mass litigation and the end of immigration enforcement."

    Other parts of the bill go beyond amnesty and waivers to guarantee sanctuary and safe havens for illegal immigrants.

    The sanctuary part (Section 3721) says immigration officers may not conduct "enforcement actions" at "sensitive locations," except in the emergency circumstances, or with written advance permission from higher levels.

    These no-enforcement zones are hospitals, health clinics, schools (vocational schools, universities and others are included), organizations helping children, pregnant women or people with disabilities, churches, synagogues and mosques — and any other "sensitive location" later designated by the federal bureaucracy.

    For illegal immigrants who manage to get arrested, there are provisos also (Section 3715) to secure their release. Detainees, who cannot get a bond, can be turned over to "secure alternative" providers until they get a hearing.

    These "secure alternatives" turn out to be, once more, "non-governmental community- based organizations" that would provide "community-based supervision programs" for detainees. So the nonprofits that get the federal funding could also get custody of their clients.

    In these respects and others, the legislation echoes the agenda of La Raza (which long promoted the language of "comprehensive immigration reform" and a "path to citizenship"). Previously such efforts have been made by this group, with some federal dollars, but chiefly with funds from foundations, unions and corporations. Now, if the new bill passes, such activities could be much more generously backed by the taxpayers.

    Another set of grants will go to "eligible organizations" that provide assistance to illegals seeking "blue card" or "provisional" status, collecting proof of eligibility and giving other such assistance.

    What's Another $100 Million?

    One section creates a "New Immigrant Council," including representatives of nonprofits "with legal and advocacy experience working with immigrant communities," to "introduce and integrate" new immigrants "into the state." The bill authorizes an additional $100 million — $20 million a year for five years — to finance these efforts. Thus a second slush fund is created.

    A third grant program appears in a later section, funding an outreach "campaign" to inform immigrants and the public about employee "rights, responsibilities and remedies" in the legislation. This recruitment project too would be contracted to nonprofits, at a cost of $120 million — $40 million a year over a three-year span.

    While the Senate bill is advertised as a "tough, conservative" measure, the largely unnoticed sanctuary funding and La Raza clauses may be the real point of the legislation. This seems likely since the bill was steered through the Senate by the Obama White House.

    Overseeing a team of executive branch bill-drafters ensconced in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, guiding the legislative process, was Obama director of domestic policy Cecilia Munoz, the leading presidential staffer on immigration issues.

    All For La Raza

    Before assuming her job with the White House, Ms. Munoz was a senior policy analyst at La Raza. Thus a former La Raza official has been pushing through legislation that advances the La Raza program and could potentially fill its coffers.

    This connection becomes even more eye-catching when we note that La Raza and Munoz were also involved in the last big amnesty go-round, in 1986, which supposedly traded legalization of illegals (then about 3 million) for tougher new enforcement.

    In that case, the legalization happened but the enforcement didn't. La Raza and similar groups lobbied for greater leniency toward illegals and against the employer sanctions that were the law's main enforcement mechanism. Ms. Munoz in 1990 wrote a long La Raza essay saying legalization was good and should be expanded, but that sanctions against hiring illegals were discriminatory and should be abandoned.

    She said further that groups like La Raza were unfairly burdened in providing costly legal services to immigrants — a problem that could obviously be solved by the slush funds in the Senate measure. She called her 1990 essay "Unfinished Business." It looks as though the current bill completes the business La Raza launched back in the 1980s.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  2. #2
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Added to Homepage with slightly amended title:
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Heart of Dixie
    White House Immigration Chief Tried to Undermine Enforcement in '86 Amnesty

    By Jon Feere, May 9, 2013

    History shows us that for the most part, advocates of "comprehensive" immigration bills are only after the legalization portion and will do everything in their power to undermine the enforcement provisions as soon as the bill becomes law. A report published only a few years after passage of the 1986's Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) proves this. The amnesty had only started to roll out, and yet the National Council of La Raza produced a report calling for an end to workplace enforcement – the central enforcement provision of IRCA.

    The author of the La Raza report was Cecilia Munoz, currently the Obama administration's chief immigration advisor. (Munoz was recently profiled in the New York Times.)

    Cecilia Munoz (left) Pictured
    with DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano (right)

    In the report, "Unfinished Business: The Immigration Reform & Control Act of 1986" Munoz (then, a Senior Policy Analyst for La Raza) wrote that "Congress should repeal employer sanctions" and that Congress has a "moral obligation" to do so. She argued that workplace enforcement is "uneven and inconsistent" and "inherently discriminatory". The full La Raza report is available here.

    Interestingly, in her report Munoz admits that mass legalization programs lead to increases in illegal immigration. She wrote:

    "[The National Council of La Raza] estimates that the size of the undocumented population today [1990], perhaps three to four million persons, equals that of the early 1980s, when the debate over IRCA took place. ... In the wake of this 'one-time only' program, the nation appears to be left with at least as many undocumented people as when it first considered these proposals."

    Munoz called for yet another amnesty in this report – only four years after IRCA – to legalize the newly arrived illegal aliens. The Schumer-Rubio proposal is reportedly already encouraging illegal immigration, despite the fact that the bill would not offer amnesty to aliens arriving after December 31, 2011. It is likely that this new wave of illegal immigration will result in calls for additional amnesties in the future.

    According to the Washington Post, at a recent meeting with La Raza staffers and other amnesty activists President Obama promised that if the bill became law, he would "revisit" enforcement provisions that he and the activists oppose. In other words, the White House will find ways to narrow the scope of the enforcement provisions administratively, just like it has for existing immigration law. No one in the media has asked Obama or Munoz to clarify which provisions in the bill they find problematic and plan to weaken and/or ignore. But if Munoz's past conduct is any guide, it is likely that the bill's workplace enforcement provisions would be put on the back burner the moment it is signed into law.

    It is also difficult to imagine Munoz being an advocate of any provisions added to the Schumer-Rubio bill aimed at reducing terrorism, provisions that would necessarily tighten immigration standards. Right after the 9/11 attacks, Munoz claimed, "There's no relationship between immigration and terrorism. People who don't like immigration like to suggest there's a connection." It is likely that the White House and Munoz are in denial that the Boston marathon attack has a relationship to immigration, despite the fact that it was perpetrated by immigrants who immigrated through our immigration system.

    Munoz's past also offers no evidence of support for serious border security. When describing the Obama administration's immigration enforcement prioritization scheme, Munoz recently likened entering the United States illegally to "jaywalking."

    The Obama administration's track record on immigration coupled with an apparent lack of support for critical provisions in the Schumer-Rubio bill necessitates that legalization is conditioned on all enforcement provisions being up and running and fully litigated. Only until after E-Verify is in place, the border secured, and an Exit system fully functioning should the discussion on what to do with 11 million illegal immigrants begin.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts