Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Law Enforcement Leaders ,How Local Imm. En.chall.pub safety

    Law Enforcement Leaders to Discuss How Local Immigration Enforcement Challenges Public Safety Mission


    Press Conference to Feature Findings, Implications of Groundbreaking New Police Foundation Report


    WASHINGTON, May 20 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The federal government's failure to secure the borders and reform the immigration system has created tensions between communities throughout the country and pressure on state and local law enforcement to control unauthorized immigration, most notably through U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's 287(g) program of deputizing local and state police to perform immigration enforcement activities. In a report released today by the Police Foundation, local law enforcement executives, however, say immigration enforcement by local police undermines their core public safety mission, diverts scarce resources, increases their exposure to liability and litigation, and exacerbates fear in communities already distrustful of police. The report and its implications will be the topic of a press conference on Wednesday, May 20 at 2 p.m. EDT at 2226 Rayburn House Office Building. Participants include: Hubert Williams, President, Police Foundation; Chief Harold L. Hurtt, Houston, TX, Police Department; Chief Theron Bowman, Arlington, TX, Police Department; Chief Ronald Miller, Topeka, KS, Police Department; Sheriff John W. Anderson, Baltimore, MD, Sheriff's Office; Chief Bernadette A. DiPino, Ocean City, MD, Police Department; and Sheriff Richard Wiles, El Paso, TX, Sheriff's Office.


    The report, The Role of Local Police: Striking a Balance Between Immigration Enforcement and Civil Liberties, examines the costs and benefits of immigration enforcement at the local level and includes the following recommendations:


    The costs of the 287(g) program outweigh the benefits
    If a local agency enters the 287(g) program, they should limit participation to serious criminal offenders and jail-based programs
    There are better alternatives to the 287(g) program for deporting criminal aliens
    Police officers should be prohibited from arresting and detaining persons to solely investigate immigration status in the absence of probable cause of an independent crime
    Implement policies and procedures for monitoring and enforcing racial profiling violations
    Involve community members in developing immigration policies
    Evaluation research should be conducted of the 287(g) program and other local immigration enforcement initiatives
    Employ community policing and problem-solving tactics to improve police-community relations with immigrant communities and resolve tension caused by expanding immigration
    The federal government must enact comprehensive border security and immigration reforms



    The foundation report is the culmination of a national effort to bring together law enforcement leaders, public officials, scholars, and community stakeholders to collaboratively examine the implications of local law enforcement of immigration laws by reviewing practices, constitutional issues, and economic factors.


    The report draws from a series of focus groups and a national conference and includes research on the rights of undocumented immigrants and the legal framework for the enforcement of immigration laws, demographic trends and characteristics, immigration and criminality, evaluation of federal efforts to collaborate with local police on immigration enforcement (287(g) program), and the experience of undocumented youth. Also included in the report are the results of two surveys of law enforcement executives on immigration and local policing.


    According to Police Foundation president, Hubert Williams, "Police executives have felt torn between a desire to be helpful and cooperative with federal immigration authorities and a concern that their participation in immigration enforcement efforts will undo the gains they have achieved through community-oriented policing practices directed at gaining the trust and cooperation of immigrant communities. As one police chief pointed out during the project, 'How do you police a community that will not talk to you?'"




    http://sev.prnewswire.com/legal/2009052 ... 009-1.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    The report draws from a series of focus groups
    La Raza, SPLC, ACLU and a bunch of Immigration Lawyers?

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Immigration enforcement enhances public safety and the benefits of enforcing immigration laws far outweighs the costs.

    The spin from these special interest racist groups is laughable at best and transparent to everyone.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •