Thread: WSJ: Immigrants and the GOP

Immigrants and the GOP
August 30, 2008; Page A10



While the Democrats were in Denver nominating Barack Obama, Republicans were busy writing their party platform. Not surprisingly, immigration was a sticking point. And while some of the more extreme proposals, such as denying citizenship to the U.S.-born children of illegal aliens, were defeated, the platform committee did vote to wall off Mexico.

The platform will go before the full Republican National Convention next week. And before approving it, the GOP would be wise to consider the demographic data that the Census Bureau released earlier this month. The media focused on Census projections that ethnic and racial minorities will comprise a majority of U.S. residents by 2042, thanks to higher minority birth rates, especially among Hispanics. But there's also a political lesson in these findings: A party that thinks it can win elections by alienating Latinos is going to be in the minority for a very long time.

A Pew poll released last month found that Hispanic registered voters favor Barack Obama over John McCain by 66% to 23%. That yawning gap almost certainly has less to do with Mr. Obama's appeal than with a perception -- courtesy of conservative immigration restrictionists -- that Latinos are not welcome in the Republican Party. Ronald Reagan regularly won a third of the Latino vote, and more than 40% of Latinos supported George W. Bush in 2004.

In recent years, however, and despite President Bush's warnings, many on the political right have tried to turn illegal immigration into a wedge issue, like guns or abortion. And while it hasn't produced victories at the polls, this strategy has succeeded in alienating many among the country's fastest-growing voting bloc. By 2020, Hispanics are projected to be 20% of the electorate, up from 9% today.

"Latino voters have moved sharply into the Democratic camp in the past two years, reversing a pro-GOP tide that had been evident among Latinos earlier in the decade," according to Pew. "Some 65% of Latino registered voters now say they identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, compared with just 26% who identify with or lean toward the GOP." The 39-point Democratic edge was 21 points as recently as 2006. It's an example of what can happen when Republicans lose their free-market bearings and start channeling cable news populists.

Restrictionists are also deluding themselves if they think sealing the border can reverse these demographic trends. Illegal border crossings peaked in 2000 under President Clinton. They're down by half under Mr. Bush. According to Census data, Hispanic population growth is no longer being driven by immigration, legal or illegal. Since 2000, it's been driven by the higher birth rates among Latino women already here.

To woo back these voters, Republicans needn't pander or abandon conservative principles. These are economic migrants who come here looking for work, not handouts, with labor participation rates that exceed those of the native born. But at the very least, the GOP must make Hispanics feel appreciated. And that's difficult to do when the party's attacks on illegal immigration end up demonizing Hispanic migrants.

Republicans might also keep in mind that most of the illegal Latino population in the U.S. is related to people here legally. To the ears of these legal immigrants, rants against illegals are attacks on a mother or father or sister or uncle -- not some abstract law-breaker.

Perceived animosity toward Latinos can also spill into other ethnic voting blocs. In the 1990s, Republican support in California for Proposition 187, a ballot initiative that denied illegal immigrants access to social services, not only hurt the party with the Hispanic electorate. It also led to a drop in GOP support among the state's Chinese and Koreans voters, even though many of them are small-business owners with a history of voting Republican.

About half of Latino voters are foreign born, which means they're relatively new to America and have yet to form strong party ties. These voters are up for grabs, and our politics will be healthier if both parties compete for their support.
http://online.wsj.com:80/article/SB1220 ... lenews_wsj

Ya and if they keep up the pandering and giving amnesty to milllions of illegals who will become (Voters), Those voters will eventually be choosing who will be filling your seats in congress and running the politic's in America....

.I guarentee you we will become a socialist country and will be expected to hand over more of our pay check to support these people.

What this implies is that there is now a large portion of the Hispanic Community which is here with legal status or citizens who have been actively facilitating illegal immigration but who then wonder why much of the rest of America resents them. This is an indictment of American Hispanics not an argument to accomodate them. The majority of Hispanics in the United States do not actively facilitate illegal immigration. there is a large portion of the Hispanic Community who oppose illegal immigration. Many of the activists against amnesty are legal Hispanc. The majority of the U.S. Border Patrol's agents are Hispanic. These law abiding Hispanics are the ones we should be helping.

The majority of legal Hispanics overwhelmingly support amnesty for the illegals. There may be a few good ones who don't support it but the majority still side with the criminals. Poll after poll has shown this. It is also evident in their voting patterns. The only time they vote for republicans is if they support Amnesty. It's no coincedence that President Reagan and Bush were the only republicans who could compete for the hispanic votes.

Originally Posted by bettsie

The majority of legal Hispanics overwhelmingly support amnesty for the illegals. There may be a few good ones who don't support it but the majority still side with the criminals.

You would be surprised to know that there are many US citizens of hispanic ethnicity who are totally opposed to illegal immigration. We just don't advertise it openly, but we DO vote.

Originally Posted by miguelina

Originally Posted by bettsie

The majority of legal Hispanics overwhelmingly support amnesty for the illegals. There may be a few good ones who don't support it but the majority still side with the criminals.

You would be surprised to know that there are many US citizens of hispanic ethnicity who are totally opposed to illegal immigration. We just don't advertise it openly, but we DO vote.

I wish there were more of em like you Miguelina but you're a rare exception. Even the Cubans who get amnesty for entering the country illegally and evading the coastguard and sometimes the border patrol still vote to give more amnesty to others. It's the govemrent's fault. We reward the Cubans for sneaking into our country and to a lesser extent the mexicans.