Thread: Longer fence on Mexican border debated

http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/new ... 085089.htm

Posted on Thu, Jul. 20, 2006

Longer fence on Mexican border debated

LARA JAKES JORDAN
Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Lawmakers grappled Thursday with whether to build a fence along hundreds of miles on the nation's southern border, weighing combating illegal immigration against a costly barrier that alone might not stop migrants.

Layered fencing stands on about 75 miles of the 2,000-mile U.S.-Mexico border, mostly in cities like San Diego, El Paso, Texas, and Nogales, Ariz. In an election year fixated on illegal immigration and border security, Congress is considering proposals to put fencing on up to 850 miles on the border, costing billions of dollars.

"San Diego was a no man's land when we built that fence," Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., told a House panel examining border barriers as a way to stem illegal immigration. He said immigrant gang-related murders, drug traffic and human smuggling have dropped dramatically since a fence just south of the city was built in 1996.

"The fence did work," Hunter said.

But Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, a former top U.S. Border Patrol official, said fencing could cost as much as $2.2 billion and might not be effective in all areas.

"There are, in my opinion, no one-size-fits-all solutions for border security," Reyes said. "I think it wastes money. I think it's not a good investment of taxpayer dollars."

The Border Patrol last year arrested 1.2 million illegal immigrants who crossed into the United States at the Mexican border. But agents estimate that two or three migrants go undeterred for every one who is stopped.

Border Patrol senior associate chief Kevin Stevens said fences have stopped, or at least slowed, illegal migrants. But he questioned whether fencing would be effective where there are natural barriers, like mountains or deserts. He wouldn't talk about specific plans to extend the fence to any length.

"Can you look the American people in the eye and say this is needed? And that it's the most practical use of taxpayer dollars?" asked Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, D-Md.

"We need an appropriate mix," Stevens answered. "It's not about fencing. It's not about Border Patrol agents. It's not about technology. It's about all of those things."

Critics said little will stop illegal immigration while jobs are so readily available for migrants. The Homeland Security Department recently began cracking down on employers who hire immigrants - many of whom work for cheaper wages and with fewer benefits. But the Bush administration is pushing Congress to approve a temporary worker program that would let illegal immigrants have some legal status.

Conservative Republicans, particularly in the House, largely oppose such a program, which they view as giving amnesty to criminals. An estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already live in the United States.

"As long as illegal immigrants can readily obtain employment in the United States, neither barriers nor increased staffing will discourage millions of impoverished people from crossing our borders annually," said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council, a labor union that represents about 10,500 U.S. Border Patrol agents.

Since they're not going to fund it anyway, why not propose fencing in the entire country? They've got to look tough on border security, after all. There's an election coming up.

And on they all go, blah blah blah. Build a freakin fence in areas then. It did help in San Diego a lot. Send the bricks we sent to DC, that would be a start. The Minutemen are building fences where property owners want one, go help them out. Geez! Talk talk talk, all talk and no action. Makes me so mad. Meanwhile no telling how many terrorist kooks have come over the border.