Results 1 to 6 of 6
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
08-13-2005, 09:25 AM #1
Mexicans Rise Again In The Lone Star State
Mexicans Rise Again In
The Lone Star State
By Francis Harris in Washington
The Telegraph - UK
8-13-5
Davy Crockett would weep at the news. Non-whites are now a majority in Texas.
The southern state was founded after the inspirational defeat suffered by Crockett and his troops at the Alamo. But the latest count of the state's 22.5 million people showed that 11.3 million, or 50.2 per cent, are non-white.
Most of the "minority" population is Hispanic, although there are also about three million blacks. But as the state mulled the news that whites were in the minority for the first time since the early 19th century, Texas newspapers spurned any discussion of the historical irony, preferring to focus on implications for the educational system.
White settlers seized Texas from the Mexicans in a series of engagements from 1836-48. These began with the defeat of a settler force at a mission station called the Alamo in 1836.
Demographers predict that whites will be outnumbered by all other races in the United States by 2050.
© Copyright of Telegraph Group Limited 2005.
http://telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml? ... 2005/08/13
/wtexas13.xml&sSheet=/news/2005/08/13/ixworld.htmlI stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)
-
08-13-2005, 12:31 PM #2
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Location
- Oak Island, North Mexolina
- Posts
- 6,231
Defenders of the Alamo. America was well represented in Texas then as it will be again.
http://www.alamodescendants.org/alamo_defenders.htmJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
08-13-2005, 12:40 PM #3
Once again an editorialist misses the fact that in 1838 most of the population and most of the territory in Texas was not held by the Mexicans it was Indian. The Mexicans brought in the Americans to help them gain and hold territory from Indians like the Comanches. As for all those population projections going forward. The projections assume that the immigration and growth rates remain the same. A look back shows the same sort of mistake made projecting previous populations. The growth curve of both the Italians and the Irish dropped off so will the Mexican.
I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
08-13-2005, 01:24 PM #4
maybe it should be "illegal aliens" are the majority --- "citizens" are the minority
"Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it" George Santayana "Deo Vindice"
-
08-13-2005, 02:20 PM #5Defenders of the Alamo. America was well represented in Texas then as it will be again.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
08-13-2005, 02:22 PM #6
[
Once again an editorialist misses the fact that in 1838 most of the population and most of the territory in Texas was not held by the Mexicans it was Indian. The Mexicans brought in the Americans to help them gain and hold territory from Indians like the Comanches. As for all those population projections going forward. The projections assume that the immigration and growth rates remain the same.
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Listen to William Gheen on Rense Apr 24, 2024 talking Invasion...
04-25-2024, 02:03 PM in ALIPAC In The News