http://www.theconservativevoice.com/article/20249.html

Mexico's Next President and Immigration
November 17, 2006 01:00 PM EST


Will Felipe Calderon, scheduled to become Mexico’s president on December 1st, be as obsessed with emigration as President Vicente Fox has been for six years? Fox was obsessed with the emigration question and allowed it to gobble up valuable time and political capital, which would have been better spent working to improve Mexico’s economy, rather than figuring out how to get more Mexicans out of Mexico. Felipe Calderon has already been talking a lot about emigration, and in that respect he seems to be following the Fox game plan. On the other hand, Calderon has indicated that migration will not be the “central axis” of U.S.-Mexican relations.


The recent U.S. congressional election opens the possibility that President Bush and a Democratic Congress will be able to give amnesty to illegal aliens and increase legal immigration. But the 2006 congressional election was not really a referendum on immigration , but a rejection of Republican incompetence. It’s significant that no winning congressional candidate campaigned on a pro-amnesty platform. The 2008 primary season is less than 2 years away, and things could change once again.
By investing so much capital on the immigration question, a Mexican president is staking his future on a question which can be reversed by the U.S. electorate.

But from the Mexican perspective, a more basic question remains. Regardless of what U.S. politicians do about immigration policy, is the continuance of mass emigration in the long-term economic and social interests of Mexico?


Certainly, emigration does generate a lot of money for Mexico in remittances.
In fact, remittance money may soon surpass oil revenues as Mexico’s largest legal source of income. Emigration provides Mexico’s leaders a safety valve. As long as Mexican governments (of whatever party) can keep Mexicans crossing the border, that relieves the pressure on the Mexican government. And that, alas, is part of the problem. What incentive do Mexico’s leaders have to reform the Mexican economy as long as the emigration safety valve looms so large? What about those remittances? Mexico is now the world’s biggest source of emigration (the largest exporter of human beings) and the 3rd-largest recipient (after China and India) of remittance money. Remittances do provide a social safety net.

But as motors of economic development, remittances are not too effective, say several experts. For example, Alfonso Sandoval, spokesman for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) , says that remittances are not incentives for productive development in the Mexican regions that receive them. And none other than Mexican central bank chief Guillermo Ortiz said something quite similar, that remittances provide a social safety net but are not a key lubricant of the Mexican economy. For a concrete example, consider Felipe Calderon’s home state of Michoacan. Of all Mexican states, Michoacan has the highest dependency on remittances, with 1 out of 10 households receiving them. Now if the remittances-are-great theory were correct, wouldn’t Michoacan be booming? On the contrary, it is one of Mexico’s least developed states and continues to send expel large amounts of emigrants. The same is true of other states with high remittance-dependency, such as Zacatecas, Guanajuato and Durango.

Rather than solving Mexico’s problems, remittances just perpetuate the vicious cycle of underdevelopment and encourage more Mexicans to emigrate. If Calderon wants real economic development, he needs to move Mexico away from its heroin-like addiction to remittances. And there are plenty of areas to improve. As former energy secretary himself, Calderon knows what a mess that PEMEX (Mexico’s oil monopoly) is in. Politically, any sort of privatization or even semi-privatization would unleash a firestorm, but something has to be done.

Mexico’s enormous informal economy is in reality an economic resource, and ways should be found to legalize it and bring it into the formal economy. Taxation must be made more efficient, as tax evasion has been estimated to be as high as 40%.Calderon could work to achieve a real federalism, in which Mexican states have more leeway in managing their own revenues, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach to the economy. These are just a few areas Calderon and the new Mexican Congress can concentrate on to improve Mexico’s economy. It would be much better than the tired and counter-productive remedy of sending more and more Mexicans northward.

Allan Wall recently returned from a tour of duty in Iraq. He currently resides in Mexico, where he has lived since 1991.