Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    48

    Penalty for hiring illegal immigrants survives test

    Saturday, December 22, 2007
    Penalty for hiring illegal immigrants survives test


    http://www.journalnow.com/servlet/Satel ... 3353956246



    JOURNAL WIRE REPORT


    PHOENIX — A federal judge refused yesterday to block the Jan. 1 implementation of an Arizona law that penalizes businesses that knowingly employ illegal immigrants.
    Judge Neil Wake of U.S. District Court denied requests for a temporary restraining order or an emergency injunction to block the law from taking effect.
    Wake said that those who would suffer most from blocking the law would be legal low-skill workers who lose jobs and get depressed wages because of competition from illegal immigrants.
    Business interests and other advocacy groups challenging the law have already asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals based in San Francisco for an injunction blocking the law

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    7,928
    And may God bless Judge Neil Wake: would there were more like him!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member magyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,722
    The case already went to the 9th circuit of appeals and the 9th circuit also refused to prevent the law from being implemented.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-95261.html

  4. #4
    Senior Member zeezil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    16,593
    Related Post:

    VICTORY AGAIN: Judge lets employer-sanctions law stand
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-95309-.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gogo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Alipacers Come In All Colors
    Posts
    9,909
    Quote Originally Posted by magyart
    The case already went to the 9th circuit of appeals and the 9th circuit also refused to prevent the law from being implemented.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-95261.html
    Are you sure about that? 9th Circuit is soooo pro illegal.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member mapwife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    2,697
    I too thought this might be done in the 9th Curcuit court, but I saw this in today's AZ Repugnant.

    What's next for employer-sanctions challenge

    • Week of Dec. 24: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could act on the business/Hispanic coalition's appeal of the dismissal of their first suit against the sanctions law.
    Illegal aliens remain exempt from American laws, while they DEMAND American rights...

  7. #7
    Senior Member azwreath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    6,621
    Quote Originally Posted by mapwife
    I too thought this might be done in the 9th Curcuit court, but I saw this in today's AZ Repugnant.

    What's next for employer-sanctions challenge

    • Week of Dec. 24: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals could act on the business/Hispanic coalition's appeal of the dismissal of their first suit against the sanctions law.





    When I was speaking with our corporate attorney this morning I asked him about that and he said the operative word is "could".

    Something about that court only having 3 business days left this year and he didn't see them wasting their time when the Plaintiff's caused their own problems.

    guess we'll see............
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member magyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,722
    Quote Originally Posted by Gogo
    Quote Originally Posted by magyart
    The case already went to the 9th circuit of appeals and the 9th circuit also refused to prevent the law from being implemented.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-95261.html
    Are you sure about that? 9th Circuit is soooo pro illegal.

    PHOENIX — Arizona’s new employer-sanctions law will take effect as scheduled Jan. 1.

    On Friday, U.S. District Court Judge Neil Wake rejected a request by business groups and others to bar the state from enforcing the law before a final ruling on its constitutionality.

    And just hours later, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused an emergency request to second-guess Wake and keep the law from being enforced.

  9. #9
    Senior Member magyart's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    1,722

    [b]Judge Supports Arizona Law on Immigrants [/b]

    Quote Originally Posted by Gogo
    Quote Originally Posted by magyart
    The case already went to the 9th circuit of appeals and the 9th circuit also refused to prevent the law from being implemented.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-95261.html
    Are you sure about that? 9th Circuit is soooo pro illegal.
    2nd link to 2nd article - http://www.the-dispatch.com/article/200 ... /712220324

    December 22. 2007 9:00AM

    Judge Supports Arizona Law on Immigrants

    RANDAL C. ARCHIBOLD

    A new Arizona law considered among the nation’s toughest against employers who hire illegal immigrants will go into effect on Jan. 1 after federal judges on Friday refused to block it.

    Both a United States district judge in Phoenix and a federal appeals court in San Francisco, (the 9th circuit) ruling on separate lawsuits by business and civil rights groups, declined to stand in the way.

    The law calls for suspending the license of an employer found to have knowingly hired an illegal worker, and revocation for a second offense.

    First, Judge Neil Vincent Wake of Federal District Court in Phoenix issued a sharp defense of the rights of lawful workers and said the law would not burden businesses in the short run.

    Then on Friday night, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit deferred a decision on an injunction until after a hearing by Judge Wake on Jan. 16, provided a “decision is reached with reasonable promptness.â€

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •