Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714

    Nevada High Court Justice Proposes Inmate Deportations

    http://www.krnv.com/Global/story.asp?S=6163146&nav=8faO
    <<Back


    CARSON CITY
    Nevada High Court Justice Proposes Inmate Deportations

    March 1, 2007 11:35 AM PST

    A Nevada Supreme Court justice is meeting with prison, parole and pardons board officials to devise a plan to deport inmates held in Nevada prisons who were in the country illegally when they committed their crimes.

    Justice Jim Hardesty says sending the inmates out of the U.S. could save the state about $10 million annually in housing costs at a time when Nevada's overcrowded prisons are reaching crisis levels.

    But an expert in immigration law says the plan could result in the forced deportation of some inmates who might be allowed to stay in the country after their release because of their living situation or time in the U.S.

    Vito de la Cruz is a federal public defender who handles deportation cases. He says that while Hardesty's plan could save the state money, it may mean deporting illegal immigrant felons who committed minor offenses such as drug possession, had lived in the state a long time, are married with children or have a job.


    (Copyright 2007 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)







    All content © Copyright 2001 - 2007 WorldNow and KRNV. All Rights Reserved.
    For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    JadedBaztard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    639
    Vito de la Cruz is a federal public defender who handles deportation cases. He says that while Hardesty's plan could save the state money, it may mean deporting illegal immigrant felons who committed minor offenses such as drug possession, had lived in the state a long time, are married with children or have a job.
    I don't give a damn! They were here illegally to begin with. Being married, having gotten away with it for a long time, having children DOES NOT negate the fact that they committed a CRIME. Deport them NOW and KEEP THEM OUT! Maybe what we need is the death penalty for a second offense? Would that get their attention?

  3. #3
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    First time offenders don't typically get a prison sentence for "minor" offenses. Besides that, I'm not so sure drug possession is a minor offense (depends on the amount and circumstances sorrounding the arrest). There is a difference in someone getting caught with a joint and a brick of cocain!

    With the border being what it is (open), I'm not so sure deporting these folks is such a good idea! Heck, we may as well turn them loose in Chicago because chances are they'll be right back.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,663
    Under what conceivable circumstances would someone who is already here illegally and then commits a crime serious enough to land him (or her) in prison be eligible to stay because of "their living situation"?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •