Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714

    Feds probe S.F.'s migrant-offender shield

    Article:Feds probe S.F.'s migrant-offender shield:/c/a/2008/06/28/MNCU111QM7.DTL
    Article:Feds probe S.F.'s migrant-offender shield:/c/a/2008/06/28/MNCU111QM7.DTL
    Back to Article

    Feds probe S.F.'s migrant-offender shield
    Jaxon Van Derbeken, Chronicle Staff Writer

    Saturday, June 28, 2008

    San Francisco juvenile probation officials - citing the city's immigrant sanctuary status - are protecting Honduran youths caught dealing crack cocaine from possible federal deportation and have given some offenders a city-paid flight home with carte blanche to return.

    The city's practices recently prompted a federal criminal investigation into whether San Francisco has been systematically circumventing U.S. immigration law, according to officials with knowledge of the matter.

    City officials say they are trying to balance their obligations under federal and state law with local court orders and San Francisco's policies aimed at protecting the rights of the young immigrants, who they say are often victims of exploitation.

    Federal authorities counter that drug kingpins are indeed exploiting the immigrants, but that the city's stance allows them to get away with "gaming the system."

    San Francisco juvenile authorities have been grappling for several years with an influx of young Honduran immigrants dealing crack in the Mission District and Tenderloin.

    Those who are arrested routinely say they are minors, but police suspect that many are actually adults, living communally in Oakland and other cities at the behest of drug traffickers who claim to be their relatives.

    Nonetheless, city authorities have typically accepted the suspects' stories and handled the cases in Juvenile Court, where proceedings are often shielded from public scrutiny.

    Unorthodox strategy
    Barred by state law from sending drug offenders to the California Youth Authority and bound by a 1989 city law defining San Francisco as a sanctuary city for immigrants - meaning officials do not cooperate with federal immigration investigations - juvenile officials settled on an unorthodox strategy.

    Rather than have the drug offenders deported, they have recommended that Juvenile Court judges and commissioners approve city-paid flights home to Honduras for the offenders with the aim of reuniting them with their families.

    The practice, federal authorities say, does nothing to prevent offenders from coming back, while federal deportation legally bars them from ever returning. Federal officials also say U.S. law prohibits helping an illegal immigrant to cross the border, even if it is to return home.

    Federal officials recently detained a San Francisco juvenile probation officer at the Houston airport, where he was accompanying two Honduran juvenile drug offenders about to board a flight to Tegucigalpa.

    They questioned him for several hours before letting him go, and seized the youths and deported them.

    "Our job is to uphold the nation's immigration laws," said Greg Palmore, spokesman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "Although San Francisco is a sanctuary city, it's a problem whenever someone attempts to evade the law. ... Our law does not allow us to turn a blind eye to any individual who has come into this country illegally."

    Feds 'flabbergasted'
    Joseph Russoniello, the U.S. attorney in charge of the San Francisco area, said he was "flabbergasted that the taxpayers' money was being spent for the purpose of ferrying detainees home. You have to have a perfect storm of dumb moves to have it happen."

    William Siffermann, chief of San Francisco's Juvenile Probation Department, said federal agents have never specifically told his office not to send immigrants back to their home countries, but that he has stopped the practice until differences between the city and immigration authorities are resolved.

    He said the city's stance is that it does not have to report illegal immigrant minors to the federal government, even if they are found in Juvenile Court to have committed a crime.

    "We are not obligated to," he said. "We are abiding by the sanctuary city ordinance."

    Siffermann added, "I don't believe we've done anything wrong." But he stressed that his office wants to make sure it is fulfilling its duties "in all arenas, with federal statutes, state statutes and the sanctuary city law."

    Juveniles with beards
    San Francisco police doubt that many of the young Hondurans they arrest on drug charges are even juveniles.

    Police can report suspected adult illegal immigrants to federal authorities if they commit a crime, said Capt. Tim Hettrich, until recently the head of the narcotics unit.

    So immigrant drug dealers "pass themselves off as juveniles, with a three-day growth of beard and everything else. It's frustrating," he said.

    "Some of them have been arrested four or five times," Hettrich said. "That is one of the big problems with being a city of sanctuary."

    He scoffed at San Francisco's strategy of returning the offenders to their home country. "They probably get the round trip and the next day, they will be right back here," Hettrich said.

    Patricia Lee, head of the San Francisco public defender's juvenile branch, would not comment on pending cases. But, she said, "a lot of the young people have suffered a lot of abuse, abandonment and neglect in their native country and have been used as (drug-running) mules. There is lot of victimization and trafficking of these young people."

    'Gaming the system'
    Russoniello said the drug dealers are being sent here as part of an effort that takes advantage of San Francisco's leniency.

    "What we're facing is a number of people gaming the system," he said. "Sooner or later the city will realize the advantage to cooperating (with federal authorities), whether it's the threat of criminal prosecution ... or some other method."

    Russoniello would not confirm or deny the existence of a federal investigation, but juvenile probation officers connected to the case have been interviewed by federal agents about the flights.

    City officials will not say how many juvenile drug offenders have been flown out of the country in recent years or how much the city has spent on the effort.

    Federal immigration authorities stumbled on to the effort when they caught several illegal immigrants in December at the airport in Houston, along with a San Francisco juvenile probation officer.

    The officer was on hand to make sure the immigrants boarded a plane to Tegucigalpa.

    Federal authorities say they met with Siffermann and told him that any juvenile offender had to be handed over to immigration officials after completing his sentence.

    The Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agency sent a letter to Siffermann on Dec. 17 stressing that it would soon "like to begin receiving referrals" about immigrant juveniles in custody in the city.

    "The red flag was flown," Russoniello said.

    City saw it differently
    Siffermann, however, said federal authorities were not exactly clear about what the city could and could not do related to the flights or the status of immigrants held in juvenile cases.

    "They did a little friendly stop-by," Siffermann said. "They said, 'This is something we would like you to cooperate on.' ... They said, 'Hey, look, this could be contrary to federal law, you might be in violation.' "

    Meanwhile, the flights continued.

    On May 15, two more illegal immigrants from Honduras were arrested in Houston, again accompanied by a San Francisco juvenile probation officer. Federal immigration authorities held the officer for more than three hours before releasing him.

    Six days later, there was another meeting, Siffermann said. This time it was with a representative of Russoniello's office.

    After that, Siffermann put the flights on hold. "We will look for other (approaches) for them," he said.

    Siffermann stressed that the city ships out juvenile offenders to their home countries only after all other rehabilitative efforts have failed, including probation, foster care and juvenile detention.

    The strategy is appropriate, Siffermann said, because deporting young offenders would doom them from ever becoming productive residents of the United States.

    "It might prevent them from obtaining citizenship," he said, denying them a chance to "take a different course."

    In a statement released by the city attorney's office, which is advising the city on the issue, spokesman Matt Dorsey said, "We've been in ongoing contact with the U.S. attorney's office on this, and we've informed them of our intention to address these issues in court proceedings.

    "We're looking at the legal issues carefully and methodically," Dorsey's statement said, "and we're in the process of advising our client, the Juvenile Probation Department."

    He said his office was not aware of the practice of flying juveniles back to Honduras.

    Stranded juveniles
    A recent count showed 22 of the 125 minors in custody at juvenile hall were immigrants and had no legal guardians in the United States, Siffermann said. He said his office is trying to figure out what to do with them now that flights are no longer an option.

    Russoniello said the city has no choice but to comply with U.S. law and turn the youths over to federal authorities. "The alternative, now that they are all on notice, is a period of prolonged darkness," he said.

    Judge Donna Hitchens, who oversees the city's Juvenile Court, said the original idea for flying youths home came from juvenile probation officials, and that it is up to them, not judges, to work out their differences with the federal government.

    "We are only the judicial branch," she said. "The issue is between the city and ICE."


    E-mail Jaxon Van Derbeken at jvanderbeken@sfchronicle.com.

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ... 111QM7.DTL
    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... .DTL&tsp=1
    San Francisco Chronicle Sections MagazineDatebookCommentaryCarsBay AreaNewsSportsInsightReal EstateBusinessHome&Garden
    © 2008 Hearst Communications Inc. | Privacy Policy | Feedback | RSS
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member gofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,728
    SF government if positive proof that smoking dope makes you STUPID!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    The DA has a big hand in letting them off the hook too.

    And this just sounds dirty.
    dealing crack in the Mission District and Tenderloin
    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    THIS SOUNDS SO FISHY. I DONT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF IT. WHERE DO THEY ACTUALLY SEND THESE "KIDS"? OK I KNOW THEY FLY THEM OUT OF THE COUNTRY....BUT TO WHERE? DOES THE PROBATION OFFICER ACTUALLY FLY TO ANOTHER COUNTRY WITH THEM? AND WHO DO THEY LEAVE THESE "KIDS" WITH? THE PARENTS? WHAT PROOF DO THEY HAVE THAT THEY ARE THE PARENTS? I DONT GET IT. IF THEY ARE FLYING THEM TO THEIR COUNTRY....WHY NOT JUST LET ICE COME AND PICK THEM UP? DOES NOT MAKE SENSE TO ME.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Siffermann stressed that the city ships out juvenile offenders to their home countries only after all other rehabilitative efforts have failed, including probation, foster care and juvenile detention.

    The strategy is appropriate, Siffermann said, because deporting young offenders would doom them from ever becoming productive residents of the United States.
    "It might prevent them from obtaining citizenship," he said, denying them a chance to "take a different course."
    HELLO?!?! WTF has he been smoking?!?!?! How does he figure they will EVER become "productive" citizens of the US if they cannot be rehabilitated?!?!?!

    Why in the HELL would we want people like this to become citizens of the US? WE DON'T!!

    SF is in direct violation of federal laws, this is ridiculous! Stop pissing around and cut off all federal funds until they repeal the "sanctuary city" policy!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  6. #6
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    San Francisco politicians are just puppets for radical labor unionists, 'civil rights' attorneys, globalist corporations, gay 'rights' ideologues, Chinese human smugglers, etc. Unfortunately this mentality seems to have infested other West coast cities, too. Why blame the polticians? They're just doin' their job.....
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    "It might prevent them from obtaining citizenship," he said, denying them a chance to "take a different course."
    BILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN OTHER COUNTRIES BECOME PRODUCTIVE MEMBERS OF SOCIETY WITHOUT EVER BECOMING US CITIZENS.

    THESE "KIDS" CAN "TAKE A DIFFERENT COURSE" IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.

    PREVENTING THEM FROM OBTAINING CITIZENSHIP WILL NOT DENY THEM A CHANCE TO TAKE A DIFFERENT COURSE. AND SINCE THEY HAVENT SO FAR SHOWN A DESIRE TO TAKE A DIFFERENT COURSE, THEN ENERGY AND MONEY SHOULD BE SPENT ON THOSE WHO DO SHOW A DESIRE.

    WHY WOULD WE WANT THEM BACK?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member legalatina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,359
    San FRansisco is such a horrible city....this week City council officials decided to ban Junior ROTC in middle and high schools in San Fransisco....at the same time they have these dangerous irresponsible policies to aid/abet illegal Honduran drug dealers to continue to commit crimes in their cities....apparently doing all that they can to thwart any effort to deport juvenile (allegedly) illegal alien drug/gang criminals while eliminating a program for youth that is positive. Is SFO on a different planet?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    I think the tactic in such cities is to drive conservatives insane enough so they leave, and then attract like-minded loonies who will also vote (along with the fake registrations of course) in keeping with the loonie left politicians. This eventually gives the liberals a clear majority, so they have to do something atrociously idiotic before anyone gets upset enough to vote them out. It sure seems to have happened in my city, which is becoming a clone of SF.
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member gofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,728
    I read the first 8 pages of comments and all of them are similar to this one. NOT ONE comment in support....even the wild-eyed libs are ticked off. How do these people stay in office?

    There is nothing that could happen in san franisco that would shock me anymore. This city has truly lost it's way and is adrift because of a total lack of leadership and because it is run by people who should be locked up, either in a mental institution or jail and in some cases both. A beautiful city with a rich culture that is slowly being destroyed by liberal progressive politicians. One day san francisco will be two cities the poor and the rich, everyone else will have left. How can you ever justify allowing a criminal to walk because he may grow up and be a productive citizen. What kind of logic is that?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •