Thread: North American Union threat gets attention of congressmen

Shad
YOUR WELCOME...here are more links...some may not seem to belong...but believe me the more you look the more you find...education industry,social security,medical industry,banking industry and the deeper you dig the more people you find are involved...

COUNCIL OF THE/ AMERICAS
Click here: http://www.counciloftheamericas.org/coa/NACC/NACC5.pdf
FIRST SPP MINISTERIAL MEETING WITH THE
NORTH AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS COUNCIL (NACC)

Click here: Ambassador Garza Announces Ten New University Partnerships Between the United States and Mexico - US Embassy Mexico

http://mexico.usembassy.gov/mexico/ep060718Ties.html
Ambassador Garza Announces Ten New University Partnerships Between the United States and Mexico

Click here: Embassy of Mexico
http://www.embassyofmexico.org/eng/

North America
EUA maintains a strong relationship with both the American Council on Education (ACE) and the Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada (AUCC). In addition to ongoing collaboration, the three associations meet every two years for the Transatlantic Dialogue, which bring together higher education leaders to discuss shared issues and concerns on both sides of the Atlantic. The focus of the 2005 meeting in Washington DC, focused upon the changing relationship between the state and higher education institutions and associations. This meeting was so successful that the date of the next one has been brought forward to Autumn 2006 in order to continue the discussions started in Washington DC. The focus of the 2006 Transatlantic Dialogue will be "Access, funding and affordability".Over the last few years, EUA has also been developing relations with the US Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) focusing on the important issues of reforms in doctoral training and the impact of the new (Bologna) degree structures on admission of European students to US graduate schools; other partners include the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) on the key issue of accountability and self-governance; and the Association of International Educators (NAFSA).

We represent 89 Canadian public and private not-for-profit universities and university-degree level colleges.

American Council on Education
ACE | ACE Board of Directorshttp://www.acenet.edu/Content/ ... d/board.ht


Click here: http://www.tralac.org/pdf/20060601_SACU_TPRM_Kruger.pdf http://www.tralac.org/pdf/20060601_SACU_TPRM_Kruger.pdf

Trade Policy Review Body. 2003. SACU Review. [Online]. Available:
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp213_e.htm.
The WTO Trade Policy Review
Mechanism:
Application and benefit to SACU

Hi All..
Lou Dobbs has been covering this for sometime AND CURRENTLY ...Mr. Trecredo also....he has been making the rounds..
NOTE:::: WHEN SEARCHING PAGES ON THIS SUBJECT AND YOU FIND ANY INFO THAT'S IMPORTANT...COPY IT...BECAUSE WHEN YOU GO BACK IT MAY NOT BE THERE....

Click here: Joel Mowbray on Consular Affairs on National Review Onlinehttp://www.nationalreview.com/mow ... 013003.asp
January 30, 2003, 10:40 a.m.
“Traitor”
Consular chief Harty is furious.

After news broke that, through what's known as a "Totalization Agreement," the State Department was brokering a deal to give up to $345 billion — or more — in Social Security benefits to illegal aliens from Mexico, Consular Affairs (CA) chief Maura Harty was furious. Not because the NR story ("Illegal But Paid," January 27 issue) wasn't accurate, but because it was.Harty lashed out at CA staff members, declaring that the "leak" at State was a "traitor." (NR may or may not have had a State Department source, and the story itself did not specify one way or the other.) After reminding them that "leaks" could see their salaries cut or lose their jobs, Harty instructed CA staffers to read State's "Mission Statement."

But when you actually look at the statement, it's not clear why Harty believes a potential "leak" at State would be a "traitor." Of the mission's five core values — loyalty, character, service, accountability, and community — State itself would seem to have violated at least two in its underhanded dealings with the Mexican government on the Totalization Agreement. Take loyalty, for starters — defined as "Commitment to the United States and the American people." How is a deal to divert $345 billion, over the next two decades, away from Social Security and into the pockets of illegal aliens an act of "commitment to the United States and the American people"?When White House officials learned the scope of the Totalization Agreement ("totalization" is government-speak for combining or "totalizing" the Social Security taxes paid by individuals into the U.S.'s and a foreign country's respective systems to create a single, harmonized retirement payment), the eye-popping price tag caught many off guard. Explains one senior GOP congressional staffer: "The White House thought this was a low-cost favor to get in Vicente Fox's good graces." According to people familiar with the negotiations, officials at State knew illegal aliens would be covered by the deal — and they also knew that the White House didn't know. Which brings us to "character," which State's mission statement defines as "Maintenance of high ethical standards and integrity."

Click here: Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
http://link.toolbot.com/loc.gov/26043
H.CON.RES.50 : Expressing disapproval by the Congress of the totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General of the Mexican Social Security Institute on June 29, 2004.
Sponsor: Rep Goode, Virgil H., Jr. [VA-5] (introduced 2/9/2005) Cosponsors (39)
Committees: House Ways and Means

Latest Major Action: 2/17/2005 Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.
****Expressing disapproval by the Congress of the totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General of the... (Introduced in House)
this bill has been laying for a year and a half.....finally introduced

SPEECH IN BILL
##### Whereas a totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico negatively impacts the Social Security system of the United States and puts America's seniors at risk; and Whereas such agreement awaits final approval by the President and transmittal to the Congress and is not effective prior to such approval and transmittal: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that--(1) the President should immediately disapprove the totalization agreement signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General of the Mexican Social Security Institute on June 29, 2004, and refrain from transmitting such agreement to the Congress; and(2) the Commissioner of Social Security should withdraw from any further negotiations with Mexico relating to totalization arrangements between the United States and Mexico.
you can search introduced bills,bills coming in to be voted on and ccurrently in congress...if you click on the bill and that in middle of that page where it says OTHER INFO
YOU CAN CHECK WHO AND HOW MUCH IS BEING AND WHO DONATED TO THE CONGRESS PEOPLE FOR THAT BILL --
THE MONEY TRAIL -PAYOLLA???
Click here: GovTrack.us: Tracking the U.S. Congress
http://www.govtrack.us/

HERE WE GO...........IT'S GETTING PUSHED ...START-UP FOR THAT 10 LANE HWY.
Click here: New trade-friendly lanes open at border crossinghttp://www.thebta.org/syndicate/news/archives/2006_09.html#001028
New trade-friendly lanes open at border crossing Melissa Blasius
12 News
Aug. 15, 2006 06:31 PM

Napolitano tours new lanes at U.S.-Mexico border
Cross-border truck drivers deemed "low risk" will be able to take the fast lane from Mexico to the United States. Nogales joined several other border cities added extra lanes to commercial checkpoints as part of the federal Free And Secure Trade, or FAST, program.

Governor Janet Napolitano was on hand for the dedication today. Trucks with special passes can use designated lanes and go to the front of the line if they are singled out for full inspections. They must go through prescreening and implement internal security procedures to qualify. Drivers in regular commercial lanes face three to four hour waits for inspections during peak periods.

Governor Napolitano also met with about 35 National Guard members serving from Arizona and Nevada. They are doing maintenance and engineering projects along with staffing a communications room where they monitor border surveillance cameras. The governor says the guard members’ work frees up more Border Patrol agents to capture illegal immigrants and drug smugglers.

BY THE WAY MRS. CLINTON INTRODUCED A BILL TO MAKE THE INFO ON TREATIES TRANSPARENT...BUT DON'T LET HER FOOL YOU...HER HUSBAND 'S ADMINSTRATION SIGNED THE NAFTA BILL .1993/1994..BUSH HAS BEEN PUSHING IT. INTO HAPPENING...SO WE HAVE A SPAT GOING ON BUSH/CLINTON/RICE/CLINTON...SO NOW 13 YEARS LATER MS. CLINTON WANTS TRANSPARET TREATIES???WOOWOO
BUSH...CLINTON...BUSH THIS ELISTIS DREAM AND IF SHE WINS IT WILL BE BUSH/CLINTON/BUSH/CLINTON...ENOUGH TIME TO TREATY US OUT OF THIS COUNTRY....

[/b]

HOTCBNS,

Great site, I have added it to my favorites list.
About the payolla trail. I have been looking at the personal net worth of politicians when they were elected to office vs their personal net worth currently. Very illuminating.

added to homepage

http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=N ... e&sid=1550

Cross-border truck drivers deemed "low risk" will be able to take the fast lane from Mexico to the United States.

Uh Huh...Tell me another

Jerome Corsi is on the G. Gordon Liddy show talking about this issue now.

EST. http://www.radioamerica.org/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WND ON THE AIR
Corsi on Liddy show today
Will discuss 'North American Union,' Iran

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: October 2, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com



WND columnist and author Jerome Corsi will be a guest today on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the crisis with Iran and the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

Corsi will join Liddy for the final two hours of his show, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.

You can listen to the program here.


Corsi has been reporting on a closed-door meeting of high-level government and business leaders from the U.S., Canada and Mexico that discussed the merger of North America. The meeting was designed to subvert the democratic process, charged an attendee of the confab.

Meanwhile, Corsi's book "Atomic Iran" continues to provide insight amid growing tensions with Iran over its nuclear program.

Last week, Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad used the U.N. podium to call fervently for Islam's fabled messiah, or "Mahdi," to come to earth. He previously has referred to Muslim teaching that says this can happen only after an apocalyptic holocaust that leaves most of the world's population dead.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=52226

in fact the U.N I believe has tried to intrude on our second amendment rights because of these treaties MAYBE NAFTA ..see as follows

The U.N. has made several attempts at this at least since 1995.

Originally Posted by Ladydrake

in fact the U.N I believe has tried to intrude on our second amendment rights because of these treaties MAYBE NAFTA ..see as follows

The U.N. has made several attempts at this at least since 1995.

Righto, LADY

Now they've put up the steam but are keeping it behind closed doors trying to make an endrun. They've managed to get the weapons from many of the EU countries and are on the hunt in the USA in a very serious way.

BTW, Mayor Bloomberg, NYC, is giving them a major hand up.

We need to push this to our members of Congress. Last August 19, 2005 when I spoke with members of Sue Myrick’s team (Matt Priest & ...), they told me she would be opposed to something like this. I wonder if she will keep her word

http://www.house.gov/writerep/

The Honorable Sue Myrick
230 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
Phone202) 225-1976
Fax202) 225-3389

The Honorable Sue Myrick
6525 Morrison Boulevard, Suite 402
Charlotte, NC 28211
Phone704) 362-1060
Fax704) 367-0852

The Honorable Sue Myrick
197 West Main Avenue
Gastonia, NC 28052
Phone704) 861-1976
Fax704) 864-2445

I will be contacting Charles Taylor as well to see if he will co sponsor this legislation

http://charlestaylor.house.gov/WriteMe/write.htm
Washington Office

339 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: (202) 225-6401
Fax: (202) 226-6422

Asheville Office

22 South Pack Sq
Suite 330
Asheville, NC 28801
Phone: (82 251-1988
Fax: (82 251-0794

Hendersonville Office

211-C 7th Avenue West
Hendersonville, NC 28791
Phone: (82 697-8539

Murphy Office

75 Peachtree St.
PO Box 1271
Murphy, NC 28906
Phone: (82 837-3249

Waynesville Office

515 South Haywood Street
Suite 118
Waynesville, NC 28786
Phone: (82 456-7559

Sylva Office

26 Ridgeway Street
Suite 3
Sylva, NC 28779
Phone: (82 586-6100

Franklin Office

5 West Main Street
Room 35
Franklin, NC 28734
Phone: (82 349-9856

Spindale Office

303 Fairground Road
Spindale, NC 28160
Phone: (82 286-8750



Track Progress of the legislation here:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hc109-487



I hope everyone who reads this contacts Myrick, Taylor and their Congressional Representatives.