Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
11-24-2006, 03:32 AM #1
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
OK -Give every resident the right to vote
Published: November 21, 2006 12:15 am
Professor: Give every resident the right to vote
The Norman Transcript
Transcript Staff Writer
OKLAHOMA CITY -- Oklahoma lawmakers should take a page from history and change the state's voting laws to allow all of-age state residents -- no matter what their citizenship status -- the right to vote, an OSU professor said last week.
Dr. Bob Darcy, a political science professor at Oklahoma State University, said Oklahoma should revert back to its territorial-style voting laws. Under those laws, he said, all residents, regardless of their citizenship status, had the right to vote in state and local elections.
"When Oklahoma was a territory, its election laws gave residents -- no matter what their residency status was -- the right to vote," Darcy said. "That's the way it should be now."
Darcy, in Oklahoma City to participate in the state Political Science Association's annual convention, said Oklahoma's current voting laws disenfranchise a large number of the state's population.
"Across Oklahoma there are large pockets of people who cannot vote because their paperwork isn't in order. Yet, these same people have jobs, families, homes and are paying taxes here. That's wrong."
While Darcy acknowledged that many resident aliens living here are undocumented -- or illegal -- Oklahoma, he said, was a state developed by an "immigrant society."
"Our state was founded by immigrants," he said. "So, I find the current political rhetoric flying around right now a bit ironic. This state was settled by non-citizens from other places."
Today, he said, many state lawmakers are using undocumented aliens as their latest political weapon. "Undocumented aliens have been demagogued for the past two hundred years. It's nothing new. It's just the group that's currently in power reacting to the latest group of immigrants."
Darcy, a former president of the political science association, said the country's latest wave of anti-immigrant rhetoric has deep historic roots and should be seen in that pretext.
"From the late 1800s to the early 1900s the nation was ran by prosperous white, non-Catholic men. They were called WASPs -- white, Anglo Saxon Protestants," he said. "And the WASPs didn't want anyone new upsetting their operation."
At that time, Darcy said, the group campaigned against the country's new wave of immigrants -- the Irish, the Jews and the Asians.
"Now, most of those groups have been assimilated into this category known as 'white'," he said. "And now, this group is raising cain against Hispanic immigrants."
However, Darcy also believes the state's -- and the country's -- latest campaigns against immigrants will eventually die out as those immigrants, too, are absorbed into the "white" category.
"The Hispanics are here to stay," he said. "This campaign is a short term thing. It's just rhetoric from a few public officials who have nothing more to offer. It's like the No Nothing party of the 1800s. The core of their philosophy was anti-immigration."
Yet even though he believes the fiery immigration rhetoric will soften, some damage, he said, has been done.
"Just like before; you have residents who have lived their whole lives here, residents who experience it (the rhetoric) first hand. That's not pleasant for them, and is causes some damange. Hopefully, it will stop before that damange gets out of hand."
Instead of rhetoric, Darcy said, the best policy is openness. "Letting everyone vote worked 100 years ago, it would work today."
M. Scott Carter 366-3545 scarter@normantranscript.com
http://www.normantranscript.com/localne ... _325001557Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
11-24-2006, 03:54 AM #2
I'm so sick of hearing the same old rhetoric of how we're a nation of immigrants. Big differences between now and then. Immigrants use to come LEGALLY. They had medical checks. were allowed in and upon getting naturalized they denounced their affiliation to their former country. Just because someone squats on our land doesn't give them the right to vote. And back then we didn't have all of the 'programs' to help take care of immigrants at the expense of the taxpayers. Immigrants at the turn of the century knew they had to work hard and take care of themselves. Political science expert eh? I'm not impressed.
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
11-24-2006, 04:01 AM #3
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Location
- NJ
- Posts
- 12,855
Just because someone squats on our land doesn't give them the right to vote.Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
11-24-2006, 04:22 AM #4
Wonder what Darcy thinks about Carpet Baggers? I bet they were voting back then.
Darcy, your an idiot! Giving rights to vote, to foreign nationals is never a good idea. I hope they all move to your neighborhood and start effecting your life with their decisions. Wack a doo and unrealistic!!!!!!!!
DixieJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Arizona GOP pushing tough, new border policies, but faces strong...
05-05-2024, 10:24 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports