Thread: OP:The Case For English Only

The Case For English Only
By Harris R. Sherline
June 23, 2008

Enough already! How many languages should we be expected to speak in America? And, how many languages should our government and other institutions, such as hospitals and schools, be required to accommodate? The problem is not just Spanish speakers. It's the more than 320 other tongues that are spoken in America today.

Hispanics now comprise about 35% of the population of California, many of whom do not speak English. So, should we be required to print all government documents in both English and Spanish, teach school in Spanish, give civil service exams in Spanish, hire people who don't speak English?

But, it's not just about communication, although that's certainly important. It's also a pocketbook issue, about the economic impact that trying to accommodate multiple languages has on our society. Alameda County (CA) Medical Center, which "has 18 full-time interpreters or staff in addition to 19 on-call translators," is but one example of the burden that such laws can place on public institutions.

U.S. English, Inc. offers some interesting facts about the situation:

-- "Since 1980, the number of U.S. residents who are limited English proficient has more than doubled, from 10.2 million to 21.3 million." (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

-- "In 2000, 11.9 million U.S. residents lived in linguistically isolated households, meaning that no one in the household spoke English at home or spoke English 'very well.'" (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

-- "Immigrants who speak English 'not well' or 'not at all' have median weekly earnings approximately 57 percent of those of U.S. born workers."

-- "Poverty and the need for public benefits, such as food stamps, are more closely related to limited English proficiency than with citizenship or legal status."

-- "The Canadian Government spends $260 million annually to do government business in both of the nation's official languages."

-- "The cost of multilingual ballots and translations represented one-eighth of Los Angeles County's $16 million expense in the Nov. 2004 general election."

-- "The City of San Francisco must spend $350,000 for each language that a document is translated into under the city's bilingual government ordinance."

-- "79 percent of Americans, and 81 percent of first and second generation Americans favor making English the official language of the United States."

-- "Air Canada spends more than $9,265,000 per year conforming to Canada's bilingual requirements, requiring the airline to generate an additional $185,000,000 in additional sales to cover these costs."

Trying to accommodate all cultural groups costs big bucks. For example, the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences reported in 1997, "More than $100 million have been spent in the last 30 years to assess the value of bilingual education. The study concluded: (1) There is no evidence that a program of native language instruction has greater benefits than any other type of education program, and (2) Teaching children to read in English first, instead of in their native tongue, has no negative consequences." The federal government was already spending $665 million a year on bilingual programs at the time.

President Theodore Roosevelt addressed this issue in 1907 when he said, "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

"The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey reveals that 83% of likely voters place a higher priority on encouraging immigrants to speak English as their primary language." ("English-First Still Favored By Most Americans," Wall Street Journal, June 7, 200.

So, what is the "English Only" movement all about? Quite simply, it's about making English the official language of the United States. A bill to accomplish this (H.R. 997) was introduced in the House of Representatives in 2007, and U.S. English, Inc. reports that it is supported by more than 80%of all Americans and almost two-thirds of Hispanics, according to polls taken in 2006.

Thirty states already have some sort of English only law and, to my knowledge, it hasn't had any significant negative impacts in any of them.

"The English Language Unity Act of 2007 would require the United States government to conduct official business in English," while still retaining the flexibility to permit or require that other languages be used to protect public health and safety, national security, or for the needs of commerce and the criminal justice system.

I'm all for it.

---

NOTE: Read more of Harris Sherline's commentaries on his blog at "opinionfest.com."

--------------------

Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.
http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/guest/ ... 6231.shtml

Thirty states already have some sort of English only law and, to my knowledge, it hasn't had any significant negative impacts in any of them.

It hasn't because they have still been catering to them in spite of law because it's not federal yet. So in the meantime, even though it is the state law, it has now trickled down to cities. It's a joke and must be stopped. They don't have to speak English but I must speak Spanish to work in most jobs in a state that has declared English the states OFFICIAL language.

Interpreters should always be citizens of United States. Or there is a risk of having illegal alien interpreters. There is a doctor who hired an illegal alien who seemed to have all the correct paperwork; but one day IRS came to the doctor's office looking for the interpreter. The interpreter had been using her cousin social security number and not enough taxes had been paid. The interpreter had left this office white collar job before IRS arrived.

So if more than one illegal is using a legal social security and everyone gives the information to the legal social security holder the illegal aliens will probably never be caught in America.

So smart aren't they.

Interpreters should always be citizens of United States

And since we are a nation of immigrants we have a host of people who could do it in alot of languages other than Spanish. It's become an issue when citizens are kept from jobs and can't get services because too many of these people don't speak English and expect everything to be given in their native language.

Originally Posted by crazybird

Interpreters should always be citizens of United States

And since we are a nation of immigrants we have a host of people who could do it in alot of languages other than Spanish. It's become an issue when citizens are kept from jobs and can't get services because too many of these people don't speak English and expect everything to be given in their native language.

Amen crazybird! I'm out of work right now so perhaps i'm somewhat more sensitive to this issue than others. I cannot tell you how many jobs in California now REQUIRE that you to be bilingual, with the second language being spanish of course. These are not minimum wage jobs either. Most are solid middle class positions ranging from $50-75 k per year. I have in the past, posted several of those "bilingual required" positions here for all to see.

Also keep in mind these are not jobs that are doing international business in which spanish would be required. If that were the case, I would have no issues with the bilingual requirement.

Why should I as an American have to speak spanish because the company that I could potentially work for is breaking the law by hiring to illegal invaders who do not speak English. Or even worse, they pander to a customer base who refuses to learn English, thus indirectly displacing American workers who do not speak that language.

English needs to be made the official language of this country!