Thread: Pennsylvania Homeland Security Targeted Tea Parties

Pennsylvania Homeland Security Targeted Tea Parties

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Sunday, September 19, 2010

In November, Pennsylvania’s Homeland Security issued a bulletin stating that two Tea Party rallies against illegal immigration might attract “white nationalists.â€

When we take this country back from the criminal Racketeering element in DC ... this FLAKEY / FRAUDULENT / CORRUPT / CRIMINALLY LIABLE PEACE OF DUNG Organization (The Southern Poverty Law Center) needs to be ARRESTED AND CHARGED with TREASON against America and it's Citizens

SEIZE ALL ASSETS and give them a government provided Lawyer to defend their actions

Its long past time to get to the bottom of this LOONEY TOON Organization

What's wrong with being white?

The Tea Party is going to become a successful Third Party and that scares the crap out of the established political ruling class, career politicians!

I throw up a little in my mouth whenever I see that Ahole Potok on TV.

ACTION NEEDED HERE

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-212819.html

Cavuto says today the White House is holding secret meetings to paint the Tea Party as "dangerous".

Can you imagine them being dangerous when what they want is to follow the Constitution and control spending? Oh, that' right, they're mostly the voice of white conservatives and we all know what Congress thinks of the white voice.

White House denies report that Obama administration is considering anti-Tea Party ad campaign

BY Meena Hartenstein
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Monday, September 20th 2010, 3:29 PM


(photo) Rex USA, Ceneta/APWhite House officials shot down reports of an ad campaign targeting Tea Party candidates like Christine O'Donnell (r).

Take our Poll
Tea Time

Do you think the White House should run ads taking aim at the Tea Party?

Yes - Targeting the Tea Party will win Dems more votes
No - The White House should stay out of midterm elections
I don't know

The White House today shot down a report that Obama's political team is considering taking on the Tea Party in a national ad campaign.

The denial came after the New York Times published an article online Sunday night, which claimed the White House and Democratic National Committee may roll out commercials ahead of midterm elections that depicted the GOP as controlled by "Tea Party extremists."

White House officials slammed the report as patently false.

"There's been no such discussion of such a thing at the White House," David Axelrod, Obama's senior adviser, told the Times, adding there had been no conversations along those lines at the DNC either.

The Times incorporated Axelrod’s statement into the article after it was initially published Sunday night, and modified the headline and first sentence of the story to soften its original thrust.

Where the original opening line read "Obama's political advisers...are considering a national advertising campaign that would cast the Republican Party as all but taken over by Tea Party extremists," that language was subsequently shifted to "Obama’s political advisers…are considering a range of ideas, including national advertisements."

"We often tweak the wording of stories and headlines between editions to reflect editing judgments and additional reporting, and that’s what happened in this case," Richard Stevenson, the Times deputy Washington bureau chief, told Politico.

But the article still cites an anonymous strategist who claims to have discussed such a campaign with White House advisers.

He says Democrats need to "get out the message that it’s now really dangerous to re-empower the Republican Party," particularly in light of some Tea Party candidates’ extreme platforms.

Democrats, who have seen their poll numbers plummet this year, expect to take a hit in the midterm elections but hope to eke out enough victories to maintain majorities in the House and Senate.

And with Republicans split in many states over the sudden popularity of the Tea Party, some Democrats see an opportunity to step in and win back public opinion.

"There is no doubt -- I don't think anyone would disagree -- that the intra-party Republican anger has changed the complexion of a number of state and district races," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said last week of Tea Party-backed Christine O’Donnell’s win in the Delaware Senate primary. "And that has real-world practical implications for the outcome of what happens in November."


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politic ... z106pBiJcU