Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member zeezil's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    16,593

    Prosecutions may result from SF sanctuary policy

    Prosecutions may result from city's sanctuary policy of harboring convicted felons
    POSTED August 19, 11:38 PM

    SAN FRANCISCO, CA --- This week's defiant stance by the city's Immigration Rights Commission on illegal felons couldn't have come at the worst time. It's not just the anger and contempt heaped on the city for the Commission's defiance of federal laws. More seriously, the U.S. Attorney's Northern District Office has an ongoing investigation that could lead to the prosecution of individuals responsible for the original blunder -- a policy of flying illegal felon teens out of the country or secretly housing them in unlocked Southern California facilities.

    Like with the much publicized case of former San Francisco Supervisor Ed Jew, the U.S. Attorney's Office is judiciously quiet about the investigation's progress.

    U.S. Attorney Joe Russinello has publicly stated that if his office finds that immigration laws were broken, individuals will be prosecuted. He indicated to me that while it's his office's policy in all investigations not to give progress reports, he remains firm in his stance that the practice of the city's Juvenile Department, and presumably now, the Immigration Rights Commission's public recommendations, are in conflict with federal statutes.

    U.S. Attorney Russinello believes the city has halted the multimillion dollar program of harboring illegal felons. He stated that his office would have filed an injunction if the Juvenile Department had continued their program. The Mayor's Office has since directed the juvenile probation to turn over juvenile felons to federal immigration authorities. The Immigration Rights Commission ignored the new policy, and recommended that the city provide resources for placing the youths in "culturally appropriate" community programs approved by the juvenile court system. This is akin to harboring illegal immigrants.

    Russinello would not estimate when his office's investigation would be completed nor if it will result in federal charges against individuals who illegally harbored youth offenders under the city's Juvenile Department auspices. But as the Ed Jew case showed, while it may be several months to complete the investigation, the U. S. Attorney Office will prosecute if the evidence warrants it.
    http://www.examiner.com/x-431-SF-Politi ... ted-felons
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    More seriously, the U.S. Attorney's Northern District Office has an ongoing investigation that could lead to the prosecution of individuals responsible for the original blunder -- a policy of flying illegal felon teens out of the country or secretly housing them in unlocked Southern California facilities.

    GREAT! That's exactly what is needed to curtail these renegade cities who declare themselves "sanctuary cities" and who pass ordinances and laws which aid and abet illegal invaders!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    too bad this guy isnt atty general, i do believe there would be less sanctuary cities

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •