Thread: Rally Organizers Differ on Boycott Issue

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... ory-footer

Rally Organizers Differ on Boycott Issue
By Teresa Watanabe and Anna Gorman
Times Staff Writers

April 20, 2006

LOS ANGELES -- Sharp divisions are emerging among organizers of the pro-immigrant rallies that brought hundreds of thousands of marchers into the streets across the nation, with two leading coalitions calling for starkly different approaches to the next major action scheduled for May 1.

In separate Los Angeles news conferences Wednesday, the March 25 Coalition of 100 political and immigrant rights organizations reiterated its call for a boycott of work, school and consumer activity to demonstrate immigrants' economic power.But the We Are America coalition -- which includes the Roman Catholic Church and 125 labor, business and immigrant advocacy groups -- urged people to attend a rally after work and school.

Both coalitions say they are united on the ultimate goal -- adoption of just and humane immigration reform legislation -- but differed over whether a boycott would prove counterproductive by jeopardizing workers' jobs and students' grades. Some advocates also expressed fear that a boycott would fuel negative public opinion, which began building after thousands of students walked out of classes last month, many of them waving the Mexican flag.

A boycott would create chaos as well as a backlash by giving fuel to the anti-illegal immigrant movement, said Spanish-language DJ Renan "El Cucuy" Almendarez Coello, a key figure in urging people to attend the March 25 rally in Los Angeles, which drew an estimated 500,000 people.

"We came here to work and not to say don't work," Coello said in Spanish at the We Are America" news conference at the Cathedral of Our Lady of Angels, which featured Auxiliary Bishop Gabino Zavala and about 20 other immigration reform advocates.

But Nativo Lopez, boycott supporter and president of the Mexican American Political Association, said a more confrontational approach in the model of Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King Jr. was needed to shake up the nation's power structure and demonstrate the indispensible role that illegal immigrants play in the economy. He questioned why organizations that celebrate the civil-rights leaders through Masses and annual memorial events balk at following their tactics.

"Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King were extremely militant advocates of Gandhian principles of civil disobedience, and they lived by those principles," Lopez said in an interview. "So what's the ruckus about a boycott? We need to put the focus of power with the worker and immigrants, not in the hierarchies, to resolve the immigration reform debate."

The two coalitions are also divided over immigration policy, with differences over proposed guest worker programs, terms of legalization and employer sanctions.

Many of the "We are America" coalition members are supporting proposed Senate legislation that includes a guest worker program and would offer most undocumented workers the chance to get in line for legalization after paying a fine and learning English. But Lopez' coalition rejects a guest worker program as exploitative and is backing full and immediate legalization of all undocumented workers.

Despite the division, most experts said it would not harm the overall reform cause. In fact, internal tensions drive and even benefit all successful social movements, including those promoting women's rights and racial equality in the 1960s, according to David Meyer, a University of California, Irvine, professor of sociology and political science who recently authored "The Politics of Protest: Social Movements in America."

"Having what you might call a radical flank is advantageous to those people trying to bargain with the system, because you can portray yourself as the reasonable alternative," he said. He added that internal divisions also promote more creativity and experimentation with tactics.

Lopez said the divergent tactics stemmed from the different nature of the organizations involved. He said some of the "We Are America" organizations may feel constrained from joining the boycott by their mission, funders or, in the case of organized labor, their collective bargaining agreements that bar it from calling strikes.

By contrast, he said, most of those in the "March 25 Coalition" are Latino grass-roots organizations, such as his Mexican political group and various chapters of Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, the nation's largest organization of Latino immigrants that claims a membership of 30,000 families.

Lopez said many of his coalition members draw their inspiration from the late Bert Corona, a Latino activist he described as the "modern founder of immigrant rights" who started the Hermandad organization in San Diego in 1951 and mentored Cesar Chavez. Lopez said his coalition emphasized the direct and central role that immigrants themselves should play in forming national policies that affect them.

But even within his coalition, members disagreed over tactics -- most prominently, whether students should stay out of school.

"We're not encouraging (the students) to miss out and get into trouble -- we don't want them to be suspended, that's not what we want," said Karmina Reyes, director of the Anaheim Hermandad Mexicana Nacional. "The kids should just wait until after school."

In contrast, Mark Jimenez, field organizer for Ontario and Corona Hermandad Mexicana Nacional offices, said he encouraged students to skip school for the day to take a stand. Lopez said he regarded a student walkout as a better education in First Amendment rights than classroom discourse.

Others expressed concern about the risks to workers.

At the "We Are America" news conference, MALDEF Senior Vice President John Trasvina said he wants workers to recognize that they could face consequences by not showing up for work that day. He encouraged workers who do want to boycott to get pre-approval from their bosses.

"There are legal risks in leaving the jobs without authorization," Trasvina said. "We want to make sure people know what their rights are before May 1."

Not everyone can afford to take those risks - or to take the day off work, leaders said. So far, May 1 events are planned in 40 states and hundreds of cities. Activities will include petition drives, email campaigns to Congress, teach-ins for students, marches, prayer vigils and the launch of a months-long campaign to register voters.

In Los Angeles, the "March 25 Coalition" is planning noon time marches through downtown Los Angeles and Anaheim. The "We Are America Coalition" march is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. at MacArthur Park and will continue down Wilshire Boulevard to the La Brea Tar Pits, where a rally will take place to celebrate "The Day of the Worker."

Still, several of those urging people to go to work and school have not ruled out a boycott, including Dolores Huerta, cofounder of the United Farm Workers Union.

"It is critical for us as we move forward that we touch the hearts and minds of the American people," said Angelica Salas, executive director for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, at a news conference in Washington D.C. "We certainly agree that a boycott is legitimate, direct action is legitimate, the question is when."

Times staff writers Nicole Gaouette and Michelle Keller contributed to this report.

He encouraged workers who do want to boycott to get pre-approval from their bosses.

Yeah, that's SOME boycott - get permission from the one you are striking against. That must be how its done in Mexico - which explains why they've never gotten too far raising wages in their own country by all this bravery!