Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member LawEnforcer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,219

    Remittances from 2008 are down 30% in Mexico

    TRANSLATED FROM:
    http://www.milenio.com/index.php/2008/05/20/241302/

    Mexico City.– The remittances from the U.S. that were sent starting this year, diminished 30 percent, due to the politics of pursuit against the migrants that work in that country, assured the general secretary of the Rural National Confederation, Hilaria DomÃ*nguez Arvizú.

    In an interview the also acting senator of Nayarit notified that during the last month that policy has arrived at the businesses where the Mexican workers had been working without documents, for which they were returned to Mexico in forced form.

    Through out the locations were labor is being expeled from Mexico an increment in poverty is observed because the resources that once before were obtained by the remittances are not arriving.

    Now the peasants do not have financing, seed certificates, supplies not fertilizers for the preparation of their land in the spring-summer cycle, for which they see hard times ahead because they do not have the resources that proceeded form remittances.

    The CNC proposed that public policies destined to the rural sector be revised to improve the conditions in which the peasants live and to assure the production of the agricultural cycle of spring-summer that already initiated in the center and south of the country.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    There is a shortage of capital for small business in Mexico. Most of the remittances sent to Mexico have been spent on direct consumption. There has been a disproportionate benefit to the Mexican corporations providing manufactured food. There are now modern multi million Mexican food companies. The solution is to educate the remittance senders to insist that where it is possible the beneficiaries grow their own food or else buy from smaller local sources. This leads to a family having savings, increases income and creates jobs. Having a policy of continued investment even in Mexico produces better results than does moving family members to a higher income and higher cost environment against immigration laws.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Santa Clarita Ca
    Posts
    9,714
    Better lock your doors
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074
    Rural National Confederation, Hilaria DomÃ*nguez Arvizú called the people peasants.

    Wasn't a member of the CO legislature censored and removed from the floor for asking why CO needed X number of illerate peasants?

    The Mexican consulate got in the act too and was critical of him.

    Besides the job magnet we need to eliminate the remittance magnet.
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •