Thread: Republican: Sotomayor had ties to extreme group

Way to go Senator Jeff Sessions!

---

Republican: Sotomayor had ties to extreme group
Email this Story

Jul 3, 7:28 AM (ET)

By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS

(AP) This June 2, 2009 file photo shows Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor on Capitol Hill in...
Full Image

Google sponsored links
Protect NC Jobs - Tell Senator Hagan to Support the Employee Free Choice Act!
www.AmericanRightsatWork.org

Proceeds of crime experts - Find analysis of cases & laws here For police, prosecutors, analysts
www.assetforfeiturewatch.com


WASHINGTON (AP) - The top Republican on the Senate committee that will consider Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court nomination says a Puerto Rican civil rights group's papers could shed light on her judicial approach, particularly her view of racial preferences in hiring.

White House Counsel Greg Craig, however, told Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., in a letter that board meeting minutes and other papers detailing the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund's activities while Sotomayor was an outside adviser shouldn't impact her nomination because she had no role in writing or approving them.

"During her time there, the organization took extreme positions on legal issues ranging from the death penalty to abortion to racial quotas," Sessions said in a statement. He said it was "absurd" for the White House to call the documents irrelevant.

The battle over the papers isn't likely to damage Sotomayor's chances of confirmation, since Democrats have more than enough votes in favor of President Barack Obama's first high court nominee, and Republicans have shown little appetite for trying to block her.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which will begin confirmation hearings July 13, shrugged off the GOP concerns being raised about Sotomayor, saying some in the GOP were going to oppose any Obama pick - "even if the president had nominated Moses."

Republicans "were going to object no matter who it was. And several of them have told me that privately," Leahy told The Associated Press in an interview at his Vermont farmhouse.

Republicans did not respond to requests for comment about Leahy's remarks.

Sotomayor early last month gave the Judiciary panel documents she contributed to or helped write while she was a board member of the group from 1980 to 1992, but Leahy joined Sessions recently in asking for more information about the group's activities and policy positions while she was involved.

The organization, now know as LatinoJustice PRLDEF, began sending some of that material to the committee Wednesday, but Sessions' office said Sotomayor's backers were delaying the release of the information to prevent a thorough investigation.

Cesar Perales, PRLDEF's president and general counsel, told the AP earlier this week that he planned to send the documents on a rolling basis, and all of them would arrive on Capitol Hill by week's end.

In his letter to Sessions, Craig said the Judiciary panel already has all pertinent documents on Sotomayor. He said the judge never served on PRLDEF's staff or supervised its employees, and noted that Republicans have in years past refused to release similar documents on their own Supreme Court nominees.

"Perhaps there is confusion about Judge Sotomayor's role with PRLDEF, and that confusion may account for your unusual interest," Craig wrote. "Let me be clear: On Judge Sotomayor's behalf, we submitted all documents the committee requested of her, and we did so in record time."

Craig also defended PRLDEF, calling it "a highly respected civil rights fund."

Sessions noted, however, that Sotomayor held leadership posts on the group's board. And he suggested her participation in PRLDEF, which brought several lawsuits on behalf of minority employees alleging racial discrimination in hiring and promotion, could help show a propensity on the judge's part for using the legal system to advantage minorities in the workplace.

On Monday, the Supreme Court reversed a ruling Sotomayor endorsed as an appeals court judge that rejected the reverse discrimination claims of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn., who were denied promotions because too few minorities scored highly on the qualifying exam.

"During Judge Sotomayor's time at PRLDEF, the organization launched a series of legal actions to throw out the test results for other city employees on the basis of race just like in the New Haven case. What role did Judge Sotomayor play in the decision to bring these cases?" Sessions said in his statement.

The White House is strongly resisting Republicans' suggestions that the hearings should be delayed to give them more time to review the group's documents so they can draw conclusions about Sotomayor.

The best evidence "of how she'd be as a judge are the 17 years of legal opinions that she has written and that she herself has worked on - not a box or boxes of documents that she didn't write, review or approve," said Robert Gibbs, the White House spokesman. "I think there has been plenty of time to review the record."

---

Associated Press writers Wilson Ring in Middlesex, Vt., and Laurie Kellman in Washington contributed to this report.

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090703/D996UMIO0.html

I heard about this yesterday and I called Sen Sessions office and thanked him for standing up to the White House on this issue. I said I knew he was getting "pressure" to be quiet and I for one was glad he wasn't.
I said that this women should NOT be confirmed as she is a radical, who has belonged to radical groups and comes with a hidden agenda that is not so hidden any more.

I know the group La Raza and anyone who is part of that group does not have America's best interest in their heart - only the country of Mexico's and "hispanics". If you are an American Citizen, whose family helped to found this country - La Raza see's you as "the bad guy" who must be brought down. La Raza, Maldef, and the rest of them will only be happy when America is Mexico. Truly, this is their hidden agenda, but they are more than happy to let it be known if they think you are on their side.

He said it was "absurd" for the White House to call the documents irrelevant.

This administration is more than absurd!

They are conniving, cunning, deceitful, CROOKS and Shysters!

Our politicians in DC need to quit earmarking money for these types of race based organizations.

I am not very excepting of people defending those organizations, considering I've never belonged a group that's membership was based on race or ethnicity. There is just no defense for it.

Dixie

Originally Posted by Dixie

Our politicians in DC need to quit earmarking money for these types of race based organizations.

I am not very excepting of people defending those organizations, considering I've never belonged a group that's membership was based on race or ethnicity. There is just no defense for it.

Dixie

The NAACP, The Black Caucus, and anything else just for Blacks are RACIST Groups and should all be shut down immediately!
It is reverse racism and they get away with it because the Whites have to walk on eggshells concerning anything racist the Blacks or Tans do!
I for one am sick of it!
I'm no coward ERIC HOLDER you idiot!