Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Reciprocity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    New York, The Evil Empire State
    Posts
    2,680

    'Sanctuary Cities'

    'Sanctuary Cities' Embrace Illegal Immigrants
    by Amanda B. Carpenter (More by this author)

    Posted: 05/04/2007
    Today, Detroit City Council members will consider a proposal to make the Motor City a “sanctuary city” with a “don’t ask, don’t tell” mandate to prohibit police officers from asking about immigration status without criminal cause.

    If Detroit acts on this proposal, it will join more than 30 other major cities that already have similar mandates.

    Meanwhile, Congress has yet to re-open debate on immigration reform after abandoning proposals last year after an agreement could not be reached to secure the border without creating a path to citizenship that would have given amnesty to illegal aliens.



    Sanctuary city policies defy guidelines from the 9/11 Commission Report, which called on state and local authorities to help federal agencies crack down on illegal immigration. On page 390 it said that, “There is a growing role for state and local law enforcement agencies [for the enforcement of immigration law]. They need more training and work with federal agencies so that they can cooperate more effectively with those federal authorities in identifying terrorist suspects.”

    Detroit City Council President Kenneth Cockrel, Jr. doesn’t think his city’s police officers have any obligation to uphold federal immigration law. He told the Detroit Free Press, “If you’re a police officer and pulling someone over for a traffic stop, why do you need to see their immigration papers? That’s not the responsibility of the police force, that’s the responsibility of federal law enforcement to enforce immigration laws.”

    Cockrel also said that he expects the sanctuary city proposal to pass.

    Sanctuary cities protect illegal aliens through local resolutions, executive orders or city ordinances. City police departments may also issue their own special orders, policies and general orders to the similar effect.

    Washington D.C.’s police chief Charles H. Ramsey recently revealed that the nation’s capital, perhaps the highest on the list of targets for terrorists, has a sanctuary policy in place. In August 2006 Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requesting documents pertaining to the department’s illegal immigration policies.

    The department did not respond. Judicial Watch then filed a lawsuit on March 8, 2007, which prompted Ramsey to write a public memo which said:

    “MPD [Metropolitan Police Department] officers are strictly prohibited from making inquiries into citizenship or residency status for the purpose of determining whether an individual has violated the civil immigration laws or for the purpose of enforcing those laws…the MPD is no in the business of inquiring about the residency status of the people we serve and it not in the business of enforcing civil immigration laws.”

    Last month, the city of San Francisco affirmed its commitment to their “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach to illegal immigration.

    Federal authorities raided the Eagle Bag Corporation in Oakland, California on April 20 and arrested 13 foreign nationals who entered the country illegally. Soon after, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom condemned the raid.

    “I will not allow any of my department heads or anyone associated with this city to cooperate in any way shape or form with these raids,” he said. “We are a sanctuary city, make no mistake about it.”

    San Francisco has called itself a sanctuary city since 1989.

    In the last year a handful New Jersey cities, Hightstown, Bridgeton, Trenton and Newark, have embraced sanctuary policies. In July New Haven, Connecticut will begin to issue “locally legal” identification cards that will allow illegal aliens to access social services, apply for bank accounts and rent property.

    Sanctuary city policies were originally inspired by churches who gave aid to unauthorized migrants from Central America who fled from civil war in the 1980’s.

    Metropolitan Organizing Strategy Enabling Strength (MOSES) takes credit for lobbying the Detroit City Council to consider providing “sanctuary” for illegal aliens. According to their website, MOSES is a “congregation-centered, faith-based community organization reflecting the religious, racial, and ethnic diversity of Metropolitan Detroit.” According to their IRS tax forms, MOSES is a 501(c) (3) charity that seeks to “provide safe zones” and to “organize to get funding for drug prevention work with 53 member churches in the metro area.”

    In 2003, the House attempted to shut off the federal spigot of anti-terror funding for sanctuary cities. Immigration hawks attempted to attach an amendment to that year’s homeland security funding bill to do this, but the amendment was soundly defeated with by a vote of 102-424.

    When Congress takes up immigration legislation reform in the coming months, lawmakers should find a way to punish sanctuary cities that refuse to assist federal agents in enforcing immigration law.

    The Senate is expected to debate on an immigration bill, yet to be unveiled, during the last two weeks of May. The House is planning to take up legislation introduced by Rep. Jeff Flake (R.-Ariz.) and Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D.-Calif.) sometime in July.

    Detroit, like the other cities who have enacted “don’t ask, don’t tell” immigration policies, will likely move faster on their city-wide mandate than Congress will be able to stiffen federal immigration laws.

    An August 14, 2006 report produced by the Congressional Research Service listed 31 cities and counties that have “don’t ask, don’t tell” sanctuary policies in place. They are:

    Anchorage, Alaska
    Fairbanks, Alaska
    Chandler, Arizona
    Fresno, California
    Los Angeles, California
    San Diego, California
    San Francisco, California
    Sonoma County, California
    Evanston, Illinois
    Cicero, Illinois
    Cambridge, Massachusetts
    Orleans, Massachusetts
    Portland, Maine
    Baltimore, Maryland
    Takoma Park, Maryland
    Ann Arbor, Michigan
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Durham, North Carolina
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Aztec, New Mexico
    Rio Arriba County, New Mexico
    Sante Fe, New Mexico
    New York, New York
    Ashland, Oregon
    Gaston, Oregon
    Marion County, Oregon
    Austin, Texas
    Houston, Texas
    Katy, Texas
    Seattle, Washington
    Madison, Wisconsin.

    * Alaska and Oregon both have state-wide policies that forbid state agencies from using resources to enforce federal immigration law. Oregon law, however, does provide an exception to allow law enforcement officers to share information on immigration status with federal authorities with those arrested for criminal offenses.


    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20547

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Miss Carpenter is congressional correspondent & assistant editor for HUMAN EVENTS. She is the author of "The Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy's Dossier on Hillary Rodham Clinton," published by Regnery (a HUMAN
    EVENTS sister company).

    They are also making it possible for Terroist Cells to operate in this cities as a matter of policy. this is insanity!
    “In questions of power…let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” –Thomas Jefferson

  2. #2
    Senior Member americangirl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,478
    Is this actually legal? I mean, if a city decided it wanted to make murder legal (which, of course, murder is against Federal law), could it declare itself a "Sanctuary City" and harbor and abet murderers?
    Calderon was absolutely right when he said...."Where there is a Mexican, there is Mexico".

  3. #3
    Senior Member swatchick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Miami, Florida
    Posts
    5,232
    We can't change federal laws. States can only make them tougher. When it comes to sanctuary cities then basically it becomes that the police can't ask if someone is an illegal alien. There is no federal law about that and that is why they do it. In the City of Miami officers aren't allowed to ask but the city is not technically a sanctuary city. Now if a police officers runs a person and there is a message on the computer that this person was deported or has an expired visa and says notify ICE they have no option but to do so unless they want to risk their job for Pedro or Jesus.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    you may now add DALLAS TEXAS to the sanctuary city list.

    i just got off the phone with the police media relations person and was told they are forbidden my federal law to act as immigration officers.

  5. #5
    Senior Member pjr40's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Redlands, California
    Posts
    1,596
    Speeding down the road to self-destruction
    <div>Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of congress; but I repeat myself. Mark Twain</div>

  6. #6
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    ALL big cities!! I think all federal funding should stop NOW to all these states. They are causing the rest of to aid and abett them by useing our tax dollars. They are making criminals out of us.
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    The feds don't enforce our immigration laws so the cities don't think they need to either. What a snowball that's forming.

    Declaring themselves sanctuary cities is only symbolic but to citizens (unless you're in businesses that benefit) it's a huge slap in our face.

    Will be interesting to see how Judicial Watch does against these contributors of anarchy.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •