Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    2,174

    Say It Isn't So, Brian Bilbray!!! (Alan Wall)

    Why do these fools continue to grovel at the feet of Mexico??? The US is under some crazy delusion that Mexico is on an equal footing with the US! You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.! Mexico is a corrupt third world, failed State! Period!!! This is not like trying to form an EU with like minded countries such as Great Britain, Germany and France with similar values and cultures! Mexico is a kleptocracy! This is so humilating!

    June 17, 2008

    Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall

    Say It Ain’t So, Brian Bilbray! Time To Dump U.S-Mexico Interparliamentary Meetings

    On June 7th and 8th, 2008, the 47th Annual Mexico-U.S. Interparliamentary Group Meeting was held, in Monterrey, a prosperous city in northern Mexico.

    It’s an annual meeting, of selected members of the U.S. Congress and the Mexican Congress, alternating between the U.S. and Mexico, to discuss issues of bilateral interest. And it’s been going on for 47 years.

    These annual get-togethers are much more highly-publicized in Mexico than in the U.S., where they are mostly ignored. If you follow the hyper-links in this article, you’ll see that most of my sources—and the most informative sources—are from the Mexican and Spanish-language media (my translations).

    You may have the impression that the "Interparliamentary", as I refer to it hereafter, is just a useless gabfest, a waste of the taxpayers’ money.

    Would that it were so! It would be better if it were just a useless gabfest. The Interparliamentary is now developing into more than a gabfest. It’s becoming another vehicle for Mexican politicians—with the help of American collaborators—to meddle in U.S. immigration policy.

    And who knows—the Interparliamentary could serve as a nucleus for a future North American Union parliament!

    This year, the U.S. congressional delegation consisted of 11 members. It was headed up by Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT).
    The Mexican delegation, however, held higher-ranking members, including Mexican Speaker of the House, Ruth Zavaleta, and the Leader of the Mexican Senate, Santiago Creel (mentioned in my most recent Memo from Mexico column as a non-exemplar of family values). It was also attended by Mexican Ambassador to the U.S., Arturo Sarukhan, and the governor of Nuevo Leon, the state of which Monterrey is the capital.

    As for Senator Dodd, what did he have in mind for the meeting?

    The Connecticut Democrat said before departing for Mexico:

    "The United States and Mexico share much more than a common border. We share a history, and more importantly, we share a future. I look forward to a weekend of robust discussion of how our two nations can continue to work together for the common good of our citizens, our nations, and our region."

    The biggest issue on the table at this year’s Interparliamentary was the proposed "Plan Merida", a controversial aid program to help Mexico fight drug cartels, which is still pending in the U.S. Congress. The House version included various accountability measures making part of the aid conditional on a "certification" of corruption and human rights issues. This is the objectionable part to Mexico—because it’s seen as meddling in Mexican affairs. They want the aid with no strings attached!

    At the opening of the Interparliamentary, Ruth Zavaleta, Mexican Speaker of the House, declared that

    "For the initiative to be successful our rights must be respected and any intentions to intervene in affairs that concern only Mexicans must be put aside".
    (Mexican Lawmaker Rejects Conditions on Drug Aid, Mark Walsh, AP ,San Diego Union-Tribune, June 7, 2008]

    I think it’s just great that Speaker Zavaleta is so concerned about Mexican sovereignty! I wish our own leaders were equally concerned about U.S. sovereignty.

    As it turns out, most of them weren’t, when it comes to Mexican meddling in U.S. immigration policy.

    After hearing from Mexican legislators on the Merida proposal, Dodd said that

    "We heard from everyone here the common message that this language has got to be changed. Our friends in Mexico needed to vent and explain how this issue was not handled well. Anything that smacks of certification is a nonstarter." [U.S. Lawmakers to Review Mexico Aid Terms, Mark Walsh, Washington Post, June 8, 2008

    Just a few days later, back in Washington, D.C., the U.S. House approved legislation that still included human rights certification for Mexican law enforcement authorities. However, Senator Dodd, who had been in Mexico, said that the certification part was "highly offensive" to Mexico, and he spoke of the "big concerns, huge concerns" about certification.

    According to Dodd, "I don’t have the details, but we’re going to have something that is no certification". The senator suggested that when the Senate approves the measure, the certification would be modified to become "guidelines that we all agree on "—but not requirements. [U.S. House Approves Human Rights Rules for Mexico Anti-Drug Aid, By Nicholas Johnston, Bloomberg, June 10th, 2008]

    Whatever you think of the Merida Initiative, it’s pretty obvious that the Interparliamentary Meeting is influencing U.S. legislation.

    By the way, while I’m on the subject, the Mexican media has reported that Leslie Bassett, a U.S. diplomat in Mexico, has proposed the integration of the Merida Initiative with the notorious SPP (Security and Prosperity Partnership). [Proponen Incorporar Iniciativa Mérida al ASPAN, El Universal, June 9, 2008

    Then, of course, there’s immigration. That’s a perennial topic at the Interparliamentary.

    And it’s a real study in contrast. When they discuss the Merida Initiative, Mexican officials are indignant, condemning the prospect of Gringos Meddling in Mexico—even if, as in the proposed initiative, America is footing the bill!

    [b]But they regard immigration as a “bilateralâ€

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    in private, to a Mexican reporter:
    Honestly, who believes anything they say? Yea, and the Blackberries were just lost in the possession of a Mexican reporter that accompanied Mexico's diplomats to the SPP. They have a record of being dishonest.

    People, Mexico is emulating a Communist country. Everytime I hear one of their officials speak, I hear a Commie talking.

    Dixie
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    2,174
    Quote Originally Posted by Dixie
    in private, to a Mexican reporter:
    Honestly, who believes anything they say? Yea, and the Blackberries were just lost in the possession of a Mexican reporter that accompanied Mexico's diplomats to the SPP. They have a record of being dishonest.

    People, Mexico is emulating a Communist country. Everytime I hear one of their officials speak, I hear a Commie talking.

    Dixie
    So true! We might as well have Communist China or Russia on our Southern border...probably much less violence, too!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •