Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,808

    SC town gives initial OK to ban on illegals (updated)

    SC town gives initial OK to ban on immigrants
    by Continuous News Desk


    (AP) -- A South Carolina town is closer to establishing an ordinance which will prohibit illegal immigrants from living in the community.

    The Summerville town council voted 4-2 Wednesday night to give tentative approval to the ordinance, which in most cases would also keep illegal immigrants from working in the town of 45,000 near the coast.

    Passage came after 90 minutes of public debate which was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. The ordinance comes up for a final vote at next month's council meeting.

    A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union warned the ordinance violates federal housing laws and that other communities have spent nearly a million dollars defending such ordinances.

    Supporters said the town has to have the resolve to send a message to Washington on immigration reform.


    http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=495765

  2. #2
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union warned the ordinance violates federal housing laws and that other communities have spent nearly a million dollars defending such ordinances.
    There's the ACLU and thier DAMN threats against Americans again! Everytime they turn up, it's like a bad penny! They are bullys!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    new jersey
    Posts
    954
    Its the American civil liberties union. Why are they helping illegal mexicans? I cant think of one case where these morons did any good for American citizens. They are always on the wrong side. Like when 1 atheist complains about a Christan symbol they are right there to make sure that symbol is gone even tho 1 million people want it. Where do they get their money from anyway?

  4. #4
    Bobby12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    88
    Very sad that Americans have to take back our country one small town at a time, one state at a time..................

  5. #5
    Senior Member Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by pattyk
    Its the American civil liberties union. Why are they helping illegal mexicans? I cant think of one case where these morons did any good for American citizens. They are always on the wrong side. Like when 1 atheist complains about a Christan symbol they are right there to make sure that symbol is gone even tho 1 million people want it. Where do they get their money from anyway?
    The ACLU has a history of supporting any who they believe are having their civil rights attacked.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html

    WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — Talk radio host Rush Limbaugh (search) probably never expected the American Civil Liberties Union (search) to become one of his staunch supporters.

    But the privacy rights group was on his side Monday when its Florida branch filed a "friend-of-court" motion on behalf of Limbaugh arguing state officials were wrong in seizing his medical records for their drug probe.

    "For many people, it may seem odd that the ACLU has come to the defense of Rush Limbaugh," ACLU of Florida Executive Director Howard Simon said in a released statement.

    "But we have always said that the ACLU's real client is the Bill of Rights, and we will continue to safeguard the values of equality, fairness and privacy for everyone, regardless of race, economic status or political point of view," Simon said.

    The ACLU contends that state law enforcement officers violated Limbaugh's privacy rights by taking possession of his medical records as part of their criminal investigation into the commentator's alleged "doctor-shopping" to feed his prescription-drug addiction.

    The motion, filed with the Fourth District Court of Appeal (search), claims the state encroached upon the Florida constitution's right to privacy when law enforcement officials confiscated Limbaugh's medical files.

    The ACLU said it was trying to "to vindicate every Floridian's fundamental right to privacy by ensuring that the state be required to comply" with the law.

    Its motion comes a week after a judge ruled that Limbaugh's medical records were to stay out of prosecutors' hands for at least 15 days more while his lawyers worked on an appeal to permanently seal them.

    Limbaugh's attorneys asked for the extension while they appealed the judge's earlier decision allowing prosecutors to examine the files for evidence that the commentator illegally purchased painkillers.

    The records included "the most private conversations between doctor and patient," the radio host's lawyer, Mark Shapiro, said last week.

    Investigators seized the records last month after discovering that Limbaugh received more than 2,000 painkillers, prescribed by four doctors, at a pharmacy near his Palm Beach mansion.

    Limbaugh's former maid told investigators she had been supplying him prescription painkillers for years.

    Limbaugh admitted his addiction to prescription painkillers in October, saying it stemmed from severe back pain. He took a five-week leave from his afternoon radio show to enter a rehabilitation program.

    Prosecutors have not filed charges against Limbaugh and their investigation will be delayed until the court decides whether to keep the records sealed past the new deadline.

    The radio host and his legal team have criticized Palm Beach State Attorney Barry Krischer (search), a Democrat, for opening the records and accused prosecutors of pursuing Limbaugh for political reasons.
    “Claiming nobody is listening to your phone calls is irrelevant – computers do and they are not being destroyed afterwards. Why build a storage facility for stuff nobody listens to?.” Martin Armstrong

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    Related Post with Longer version and more information



    http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... 48#1102948

  7. #7
    keekee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    S.E. Michigan
    Posts
    270

    Re: SC town gives initial OK to ban on illegal immigrants

    Quote Originally Posted by OneNationUnderGod
    SC town gives initial OK to ban on immigrants
    by Continuous News Desk


    (AP) -- A South Carolina town is closer to establishing an ordinance which will prohibit illegal immigrants from living in the community.

    The Summerville town council voted 4-2 Wednesday night to give tentative approval to the ordinance, which in most cases would also keep illegal immigrants from working in the town of 45,000 near the coast.

    Passage came after 90 minutes of public debate which was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. The ordinance comes up for a final vote at next month's council meeting.

    A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union warned the ordinance violates federal housing laws and that other communities have spent nearly a million dollars defending such ordinances.

    Supporters said the town has to have the resolve to send a message to Washington on immigration reform.


    http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=495765
    What, "rights" exactly do these illegal aliens have? They are always screaming about their "rights!" Is it REALLY written in federal housing laws that illegals have the "right" to housing? Or is it that they have a right to "federal" housing; that is, the housing taxpayers help pay for like Section 8 and HUD housing. Does anyone know the answer?

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    927

    Re: SC town gives initial OK to ban on illegal immigrants

    Quote Originally Posted by keekee
    Quote Originally Posted by OneNationUnderGod
    SC town gives initial OK to ban on immigrants
    by Continuous News Desk


    (AP) -- A South Carolina town is closer to establishing an ordinance which will prohibit illegal immigrants from living in the community.

    The Summerville town council voted 4-2 Wednesday night to give tentative approval to the ordinance, which in most cases would also keep illegal immigrants from working in the town of 45,000 near the coast.

    Passage came after 90 minutes of public debate which was evenly divided between supporters and opponents. The ordinance comes up for a final vote at next month's council meeting.

    A representative of the American Civil Liberties Union warned the ordinance violates federal housing laws and that other communities have spent nearly a million dollars defending such ordinances.

    Supporters said the town has to have the resolve to send a message to Washington on immigration reform.


    http://www.carolinalive.com/news/story.aspx?id=495765
    What, "rights" exactly do these illegal aliens have? They are always screaming about their "rights!" Is it REALLY written in federal housing laws that illegals have the "right" to housing? Or is it that they have a right to "federal" housing; that is, the housing taxpayers help pay for like Section 8 and HUD housing. Does anyone know the answer?


    did you see the crowd of people who showed up to pick up section 8 housing applications ( major story in the news ), i'd love to see the illegal immgrants tell all of those people that THEY have the right to that housing as well ..

  9. #9
    Senior Member butterbean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    11,181
    Illegal aliens dont have any rights to live or work in the country. The ACLU has no reason to do anything about the status of illegals. Why dont they start defending Americans? Otherwise change the name of their organization, because it misrepresents their intended purpose, which would be to defend Americans.
    RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  10. #10
    Senior Member Watson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    591
    Quote Originally Posted by butterbean
    Illegal aliens dont have any rights to live or work in the country. The ACLU has no reason to do anything about the status of illegals. Why dont they start defending Americans? Otherwise change the name of their organization, because it misrepresents their intended purpose, which would be to defend Americans.
    I do believe the ACLU has taken an overly broad view of the bill of rights.
    “Claiming nobody is listening to your phone calls is irrelevant – computers do and they are not being destroyed afterwards. Why build a storage facility for stuff nobody listens to?.” Martin Armstrong

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •