Thread: Federal immigration bench lacks experience

~~~~~
Federal immigration bench lacks experience
Published: May 26, 2007 at 2:48 PM
WASHINGTON, May 26 (UPI) -- Many federal immigration judges appointed by the U.S. attorney general lack experience in immigration law, it was reported Saturday.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has appointed more than two dozen federal immigration judges in the last two years, the Los Angeles Times reported. They include a former treasurer of the Louisiana Republican Party, who worked for the Bush Florida recount team after the 2000 presidential election, a former Republican congressional aide and a Texan appointed by then-Gov. George Bush to the state library commission.

They are among a growing number of the nation's more than 200 immigration judges lacking experience in the law they were appointed to enforce, the Times reported.

The usually low-profile immigration bench is attracting new attention in light of last week's testimony by former Justice Department official Monica Goodling that immigration judges were screened for loyalty to the GOP.

http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20070526-012300-1304

Comments being left after this story at the source link.
~~~~~~~~

May 25, 2007, 11:53PM
Hiring of immigration judges may have violated laws
Officials say Justice Department considered applicants' political ties


By RICHARD B. SCHMITT
Los Angeles Times
WASHINGTON — Over the last two years, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has appointed more than two dozen individuals as federal immigration judges.

The new jurists include a former treasurer of the Louisiana Republican Party, who was a legal adviser to the Bush Florida recount team after the 2000 presidential election. There is also a former GOP congressional aide who had tracked voter fraud issues for the Justice Department, and a Texan who was once appointed by then-Gov. George W. Bush to a seat on the state library commission.

One thing missing on many of their resumes: a background in immigration law.

These lawyers are joining the ranks of a growing number of the more than 200 immigration judges around the United States who have little or no experience in the law they were appointed to enforce.

The admission by former Justice Department official Monica Goodling this week that federal immigration judges were screened for their political credentials and loyalty to the Republican Party in possible violation of civil-service laws is drawing new attention to the usually low-profile immigration bench.

The selection process that Goodling described also appeared at odds with Gonzales' own stated efforts to reform the trouble-plagued immigration-law system by bringing in experts and establishing tougher performance standards for judges.

Goodling testified that as a senior counsel to Gonzales in 2005 and 2006 she considered factors such as party affiliation and political donations when screening immigration judge applicants. She said she did not remember in how many cases she applied such a test.

Of the 226 immigration judges around the country, 75 have been appointed during the Bush administration — 26 of them during Gonzales' tenure. The judges handled more than 300,000 cases last year, including deportation and asylum proceedings.

Immigration lawyers and judges said Goodling's revelation explained what they perceived as a growing politicization of the immigration bench in recent years.

"In the last few years, we have seen the appointment of a good number of immigration judges with no background whatsoever in immigration ... which really makes you wonder how it is they are being appointed to those positions," said Crystal Williams, deputy director of programs at the American Immigration Lawyers Association in Washington.

In light of Goodling's testimony, Williams said, "I think we might have an answer."

Gonzales' appointment last year of an immigration judge in Arizona, Bruce A. Taylor, was one that turned heads. Taylor is considered an expert — not in immigration law but in prosecuting adult-obscenity cases. Such cases are important to social conservatives, who form an important base of support for the Republican Party.

His former colleagues adamantly defend the selection, however.

"He is far more qualified than most attorneys appointed to the federal bench. He is certainly capable of mastering immigration law," said Patrick Trueman, a former Justice Department obscenity prosecutor. "Federal judges handle a wide variety of issues they did not handle in their law practice. What is important is good legal judgment and experience."

The Justice Department defended the new judges as well.

"The department values temperament, analytical ability, and relevant experience in the selection of immigration judges, and believes that outstanding immigration judges can come from diverse legal backgrounds," spokeswoman Cynthia Magnuson said Friday. "The department considers all applicants based on the totality of their professional records and backgrounds. Immigration judges appointed during this administration were well qualified for their current positions."

The Justice Department has launched an internal review to see whether laws were broken in the hiring of the immigration judges as well as career prosecutors.

Goodling testified that she was told by another Justice official that, because the judges are appointed by the attorney general, she could include political factors. Responding to her testimony, a Justice Department spokesman said Thursday that the department has never taken that view.

Considering political affiliation in filling civil service positions is a violation of the Hatch Act, which is designed to keep party politics separate from the day-to-day operations of the federal government. That could result in the firing of any employees involved in the illegal screening, and could trigger litigation by applicants who were declined positions on the basis that they were illegally discriminated against.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/pol ... 37920.html

Added to Home Page:
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=N ... =0&thold=0

I knew there was something amiss with this Gonzales character. He doesn't seem to have Americans best interest in mind.