Thread: Sessions: Trump ‘Not Backing Down’ on Core Issues

Attorney general says immigration pledges on track, border agents 'fired up'

by Kathryn Blackhurst | Updated 12 Apr 2017 at 12:32 PM

Attorney General Jeff Sessions insisted President Donald Trump is “not backing down from” his campaign promises to build a border wall and revamp immigration policies amid reports of ideological wars in the White House, during an interview Wednesday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.”

The attorney general addressed Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly’s doubts last week, expressed during a Senate Homeland Security committee hearing, in which he said “it is unlikely that we will build a wall, a physical barrier, from sea to shining sea.”

“The president shares the view. He’s still insisting we’re going to build this wall, and he’s not backing down from it,” Sessions said. “And he’s supported me and Homeland Security in stepping up in enforcement at the border 100 percent. And we’re carrying out his agenda.”

Sessions also downplayed reports of civil war in the White House between populist-conservative Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner.

Sessions says he believes everyone at the White House is committed to immigration enforcement and border security.

“I think that’s shared throughout the White House. And I don’t believe anybody is going to object to that,” Sessions continued.

“I’m an admirer of Steve Bannon, and the Trump family, and they’ve been supportive of what we’re doing,” Sessions said. “I believe that we’ve got a president who spoke clearly, telling the world that our border is not open, don’t come.”

The attorney general said the simple shift in priorities and tone from the new administration has improved conditions on the nation’s southern border. Sessions said he witnessed this firsthand on Tuesday, when he visited the U.S.-Mexico border in Arizona.

“The border patrol officers that I met with — and who, by the way, were so frustrated with the Obama administration that for the first time in history they endorsed President Trump in the primary, and I believe in the general election and stood with him. They are fired up,” Sessions said. “They believe things are happening to a positive degree. And they were very supportive of me.”

Ingraham asked if Trump’s populist-conservative agenda may be slipping away inside the White House, Sessions insisted that Trump has not changed the core tenets of his “America first” campaign platform.

“I think that the president talked clearly about this for many, many years. He has been a critic of these trade deals that he believes disadvantaged working people in the United States. And I’ve come to share that view,” Sessions said.

Sessions pointed to one of Trump’s early moves — removing the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

“Trump’s election killed it,” Sessions said. “He promised to kill it and he’s killed it. So, that was nip and tuck.”

When Ingraham brought up concerns that Tump’s first visit with Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago last week represented a softening of his tough campaign stance on trade with China, Sessions said give and take is all part of the deal.

“The relationship between the United States and China is so important for our future, their future and the world’s future. So no, we should be meeting and discussing things,” Sessions said. “But I do believe the president understands and has the will which we’ve lacked for many years in actually negotiating things with the Chinese that strengthen our position.”

"I do believe that there's been problems in which we have not adequately defended the American manufacturing base and our American workers," Sessions added. "So, there's no doubt that we've got to better about that. But we can't, you know, just sever our relations."

As for Trump's travel-ban executive order, which has been struck down by district court judges, Sessions signaled that the Justice Department's fight wasn't nearly over yet.

"We believe that order is absolutely justified. It's legal, it's defensible, and we're going to defend it with every bit of strength we have and the best lawyers we can put into it. And we intend to win this, and I believe we will," Sessions said.

"It's frustrating beyond imagination to have a single sitting district judge somewhere that issues an order that stops the entire policy of the United States government," Sessions added, noting that some judges erroneously "think they have a policy role."

"And so, I think the president was clearly correct in doing this," Sessions said.

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/...g-core-issues/

“I think that the president talked clearly about this for many, many years. He has been a critic of these trade deals that he believes disadvantaged working people in the United States. And I’ve come to share that view,” Sessions said.

Sessions used to support free trade, but doesn't any more because of Trump. I've heard several Republicans admit they were wrong about the free trade mantra. The Bushes sold the concept based on this bigger pie story. It's not a bigger pie when you have trade deficits, only when you have trade surpluses. The result of our free trade scams were huge trade deficits, so not only was the pie smaller, with immigration at the same time, no matter how thin you cut the slices, there weren't enough to go around.

Sessions is such a wonderful man. He'll be a fantastic Attorney General.

Originally Posted by Judy

Sessions used to support free trade, but doesn't any more because of Trump. I've heard several Republicans admit they were wrong about the free trade mantra. The Bushes sold the concept based on this bigger pie story. It's not a bigger pie when you have trade deficits, only when you have trade surpluses. The result of our free trade scams were huge trade deficits, so not only was the pie smaller, with immigration at the same time, no matter how thin you cut the slices, there weren't enough to go around.

Sessions is such a wonderful man. He'll be a fantastic Attorney General.

Sessions conversion had nothing to do with President Trump. Actually, he was a big influence on Trump and helped to shape Trump's position on trade, immigration, etc. Trump has been quoted in the past calling himself a free-trader. Reading the following article is very informative on how much Sessions influenced President Trump and his varies positions, including trade.

"Trump’s hard-line actions have an intellectual godfather: Jeff Sessions

By Philip Rucker and Robert Costa January 30

In jagged black strokes, President Trump’s signature was scribbled onto a catalogue of executive orders over the past 10 days that translated the hard-line promises of his campaign into the policies of his government.

The directives bore Trump’s name, but another man’s fingerprints were also on nearly all of them: Jeff Sessions.

The early days of the Trump presidency have rushed a nationalist agenda long on the fringes of American life into action — and Sessions, the quiet Alabam*ian who long cultivated those ideas as a Senate backbencher, has become a singular power in this new Washington.

Sessions’s ideology is driven by a visceral aversion to what he calls “soulless globalism,” a term used on the extreme right to convey a perceived threat to the United States from free trade, international alliances and the immigration of nonwhites.

And despite many reservations among Republicans about that worldview, Sessions — whose 1986 nomination for a federal judgeship was doomed by accusations of racism that he denied — is finding little resistance in Congress to his proposed role as Trump’s attorney general.

http://Who is Jeff Sessions?  P...shington Post)

Sessions’s nomination is scheduled to be voted on Tuesday by the Senate Judiciary Committee, but his influence in the administration stretches far beyond the Justice Department. From immigration and health care to national security and trade, Sessions is the intellectual godfather of the president’s policies. His reach extends throughout the White House, with his aides and allies accelerating the president’s most dramatic moves, including the ban on refugees and citizens from seven mostly Muslim nations that has triggered fear around the globe.

The author of many of Trump’s executive orders is senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, a Sessions confidant who was mentored by him and who spent the weekend overseeing the government’s implementation of the refu*gee ban. The tactician turning Trump’s agenda into law is deputy chief of staff Rick Dearborn, Sessions’s longtime chief of staff in the Senate. The mastermind behind Trump’s incendiary brand of populism is chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon, who, as chairman of the Breitbart website, promoted Sessions for years.

Then there is Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, who considers Sessions a savant and forged a bond with the senator while orchestrating Trump’s trip last summer to Mexico City and during the darkest days of the campaign.


In an email in response to a request from The Washington Post, Bannon described Sessions as “the clearinghouse for policy and philosophy” in Trump’s administration, saying he and the senator are at the center of Trump’s “pro-America movement” and the global nationalist phenomenon.

“In America and Europe, working people are reasserting their right to control their own destinies,” Bannon wrote. “Jeff Sessions has been at the forefront of this movement for years, developing populist nation-state policies that are supported by the vast and overwhelming majority of Americans, but are poorly understood by cosmopolitan elites in the media that live in a handful of our larger cities.”

He continued: “Throughout the campaign, Sessions has been the fiercest, most dedicated, and most loyal promoter in Congress of Trump’s agenda, and has played a critical role as the clearinghouse for policy and philosophy to undergird the implementation of that agenda. What we are witnessing now is the birth of a new political order, and the more frantic a handful of media elites become, the more powerful that new political order becomes itself.”


Trump, who is never shy about showering praise on his loyalists, speaks of Sessions with reverence. At a luncheon the day before his inauguration, Trump singled out someone in the audience: “the legendary Jeff Sessions.”

Trump said in an email to The Post that Sessions is “a truly fine person.”

“Jeff was one of my earliest supporters and the fact that he is so highly respected by everyone in both Washington, D.C., and around the country was a tremendous asset to me throughout the campaign,” Trump wrote.

Sessions helped devise the president’s first-week strategy, in which Trump signed a blizzard of executive orders that begin to fulfill his signature campaign promises — although Sessions had advocated going even faster.


The senator lobbied for a “shock-and-awe” period of executive action that would rattle Congress, impress Trump’s base and catch his critics unaware, according to two officials involved in the transition planning. Trump opted for a slightly slower pace, these officials said, because he wanted to maximize news coverage by spreading out his directives over several weeks.

Trump makes his own decisions, but Sessions was one of the rare lawmakers who shared his impulses.

“Sessions brings heft to the president’s gut instincts,” said Roger Stone, a longtime Trump adviser. He compared Sessions to John Mitchell, who was attorney general under Richard M. Nixon but served a more intimate role as a counselor to the president on just about everything. “Nixon is not a guy given to taking advice, but Mitchell was probably Nixon’s closest adviser,” Stone said.


There are limits to Sessions’s influence, however. He has not persuaded Trump — so far, at least — to eliminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, under which children brought to the United States illegally are allowed to stay in the country.

Sessions has also been leading the internal push for Trump to nominate William H. Pryor Jr., his deputy when Sessions was Alabama’s attorney general and now a federal appeals court judge, for the Supreme Court. While Pryor is on Trump’s list of three finalists, it is unclear whether he will get the nod.

In his senior staff meetings, Trump talks about Sessions as someone who “gets things done,” calmly and without fanfare, said Kellyanne Conway, the White House counselor.

“He does it in a very courtly, deliberative manner,” she said. “There’s never a cloud of dust or dramatic flourish.”

Newt Gingrich, a former speaker of the House and informal Trump adviser, said, “Sessions is the person who is comfortable being an outsider to the establishment but able to explain the establishment to Trump. There is this New York-Los *Angeles bias that if you sound like Alabama, you can’t be all that bright, but that’s totally wrong, and Trump recognized how genuinely smart Sessions is.”

Sessions was especially instrumental in the early days of the transition, which was taken over by Dearborn after a purge of New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s associates. Sessions became a daily presence at Trump Tower in New York, mapping out the policy agenda and making personnel decisions.

Once former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani was out of consideration for secretary of state, Trump considered nominating Sessions because he was so trusted by the inner circle, including Kushner, although Sessions’s preference was to be attorney general, according to people familiar with the talks.

Since his nomination, Sessions has been careful to not be formally involved even as his ideas animate the White House. In a statement Sunday, he denied that he has had “communications” with his former advisers or reviewed the executive orders.

Sessions has installed close allies throughout the administration. He persuaded Cliff Sims, a friend and adviser, to sell his Alabama media outlet and take a job directing message strategy at the White House. Sessions also influenced the selection of Peter Navarro, an economist and friend with whom he co-authored an op-ed last fall warning against the “rabbit hole of globalism,” as director of the National Trade Council.

Sessions’s connections extend into the White House media briefing room, where press secretary Sean Spicer took the first question at his Jan. 24 briefing from a journalist at LifeZette, a conservative website run by Laura Ingraham, a Trump supporter and populist in the Sessions mold. The website’s senior editor is Garrett Murch, a former communications adviser to Sessions.

Another link: Julia Hahn, a Breitbart writer who favorably chronicled Sessions’s immigration crusades over the past two years, was hired by Bannon to be one of his White House aides.

More mainstream Republicans have been alarmed by Sessions’s ascent. John Weaver, a veteran GOP strategist who was a consultant on Sessions’s first Senate campaign and is now a Trump critic, said Sessions is at the pinnacle of power because he shares Trump’s “1940s view of fortress America.”

“That’s something you would find in an Allen Drury novel,” Weaver said. “Unfortunately, there are real consequences to this, which are draconian views on immigration and a view of America that is insular and not an active member of the global community.”


Inside the White House and within Sessions’s alumni network, people have taken to calling the senator “Joseph,” referring to the Old Testament patriarch who was shunned by his family and sold into slavery as a boy, only to rise through unusual circumstances to become right hand to the pharaoh and oversee the lands of Egypt.

In a 20-year Senate career, Sessions has been isolated in his own party, a dynamic crystallized a decade ago when he split with President George W. Bush and the business community over comprehensive immigration changes.

In lonely and somewhat conspiratorial speeches on the Senate floor, Sessions would chastise the “masters of the universe.” He hung on his office wall a picture of He-Man from the popular 1980s comic book series.

As he weighed a presidential run, Trump liked what he saw in Sessions, who was tight with the constituencies Trump was eager to rouse on the right. So he cultivated a relationship, giving Sessions $2,000 for his 2014 reelection even though the senator had no Democratic opponent.

“Sessions was always somebody that we had targeted,” said Sam Nunberg, Trump’s political adviser at the time.


In May 2015, Nunberg said, he reached out to Miller, then an adviser to Sessions, to arrange a phone call between Trump and the senator. The two hit it off, with Trump telling Nunberg, “That guy is tough.”

The next month, Trump declared his candidacy. In August of that year, Sessions joined Trump at a mega-rally in the senator’s home town of Mobile and donned a “Make America Great Again” cap. By January 2016, Miller had formally joined the campaign and was traveling daily with the candidate, writing speeches and crafting policies.

“Senator Sessions laid a bit of groundwork . . . on matters like trade and illegal immigration,” Conway said. “It was candidate Trump then who was able to elevate those twin pillars in a way that cast it through the lens of what’s good for the American worker.”

As Trump kept rising, so did Sessions.

“It’s like being a guerrilla in the hinterlands preparing for the next hopeless assault on the government,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, a conservative research institute. “Then you get a message that the capital has fallen.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.6e4a5cc77ecf

Actually, Ronald Reagan started the idea of free trade. He said we were going to export our 'dirty industry' and we would be a 'service economy'.

I'm sure it was in the works long before Reagan, but he preached it, and worked for NAFTA.

But of course, the Bushes have been undermining this country for a very long time.

Originally Posted by nntrixie

Actually, Ronald Reagan started the idea of free trade. He said we were going to export our 'dirty industry' and we would be a 'service economy'.

I'm sure it was in the works long before Reagan, but he preached it, and worked for NAFTA.

But of course, the Bushes have been undermining this country for a very long time.

Reagan, bless his heart, was an idiot when it came to both trade and immigration, and a few other things as well. But a great President loved by all in spite of it.

MW, so you didn't know that Jeff Sessions voted for CAFTA, normal trade relations with China, the free trade agreements with Singapore, Oman, Peru, Chile and expanding trade to the third world? I'm sure he would have voted for NAFTA, but that was several years before Jeff was in the US Senate.

Donald Trump has been opposed to these free trade deals for over 40 years. Trump was against them before Stephen Miller was born and before Sessions was even in the US Senate. That doesn't take away from their efforts today, or their help during the campaign or them doing a great job for our country now in their new positions.

But if for some untold reason you feel better about yourself believing they shaped Trump instead of the other way around, then have at it. The truth is a matter of public record. You really need to watch this video, MW:

This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected If It Goes Viral



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVJOPucMAXY

MW, so you didn't know that Jeff Sessions voted for CAFTA, normal trade relations with China, the free trade agreements with Singapore, Oman, Peru, Chile and expanding trade to the third world?

Of course I did, but that was then. If Trump would have been in the House or Senate, he may have done the same thing since he would not have had the final vote (vote meaning final word) like he does now.

"I'm a free trader. I want free trade, but it's got to be fair trade. It's got to be good deals for the United States." --Donald Trump

I still say Sessions has had a lot of influence on Trump where trade is concerned. Oh, and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with "shaping" Sessions on the issue.

Didn't Trump say he would renegotiate or end NAFTA within his first 100 days in office? Well, he better hurry up and get 'er done.

Then, you just skip along and say whatever you want.

Originally Posted by Judy

Reagan, bless his heart, was an idiot when it came to both trade and immigration, and a few other things as well. But a great President loved by all in spite of it.

He was loved by some and I liked him mightily, until I looked back and saw some of the things he actually did.

Trade deals, amnesty --

I don't know why he did what he did - because I think he really loved this country. The last President I can say that about. Of course I could be wrong there.

Now - maybe if I had had George Bush ( a scary man with scary friends) as my VP, and his ex neighbor, and still a friend of the family, had taken a shot at me and almost killed me, I might do whatever I was told.