Thread: State Lawmakers Push Back Against Immigration Enforcement

State Lawmakers Push Back Against Immigration Enforcement Program

Posted: 04/21/11 06:22 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- State lawmakers in Illinois and California are pushing to cut their states' ties to an immigration enforcement program that they say was unfairly imposed on local governments against their wishes.

The program, Secure Communities, is touted as a key component of the Department of Homeland Security's immigration enforcement strategy and has helped DHS set records for deportations and removals. The Obama administration plans to expand the program nationwide by 2013.

But the program's success is tainted by criticisms at the local level, where law enforcement officials and immigrant rights advocates say it is expensive, distracts police from other duties, and unfairly nets undocumented people who did not commit crimes.

Worst of all, according to critics, local jurisdictions that do not want to participate in the program are unable to withdraw from it, even though the federal government originally said the program was voluntary.

A bill in Illinois, called The Smart Enforcement Act, would correct this problem, said sponsor Rep. Dan Burke.

"There should be a provision in these programs that local communities can opt out if they decide it's not working in their best interest or it's adding costs or there are unintended consequences," said Burke, who represents a majority-Latino district in Southwest Chicago. "It seems like a very fair and reasonable solution to a problem that was brought up by our local sheriffs and communities."

Secure Communities is a finger-print sharing system, which allows the Department of Homeland Security to run prints taken from local police through databases to check for immigration status. Police routinely take fingerprints after arrests, then submit them to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for background checks.

The Smart Enforcement Act, like a similar bill in California, would allow counties to opt-out of the program, or block fingerprint-sharing with immigration enforcement agencies.

The California bill, called the TRUST Act, was introduced by state Assemblyman Tom Ammiano. He represents San Francisco, one of the counties that attempted to opt-out of Secure Communities. San Francisco is officially a "sanctuary city," meaning its police are banned from immigration enforcement, in order to foster and maintain trust and police cooperation in immigrant communities.

In Illinois, two sheriffs have come out in support of the Smart Enforcement Act, claiming Secure Communities makes it harder for law enforcement to do its job.

"Over the course of this program, I have witnessed it evolve into something different than what we were led to believe was the purpose of this program," Kane County Sheriff Pat Perez said at a press conference.

There are a variety of complaints against Secure Communities, from the structure of the program to the way it was initially rolled out. The aim of the program, according to ICE officials, is to detect and remove the "worst of the worst" of undocumented immigrants: people who are in the United States without authorization and have committed serious crimes. But critics of Secure Communities note the program also nets a large number of undocumented immigrants who are never convicted of a crime, or are convicted of only low-level violations such as selling phone cards or driving without a license.

The Illinois bill is not meant to help undocumented immigrants evade enforcement agencies, but to protect law-abiding people from racial profiling or from being detained as witnesses to or victims of a crime, Burke said.

"We all believe that those who are in our communities who are not obeying the law of the state -- we don't want them," Burke said. "They would detract from the goal of these folks without documentation to achieve citizenship. If the program were working as it was designed to work, there would be no issue."

More broadly, the bills respond to broad confusion over whether jurisdictions should be required to hand over fingerprints to immigration enforcement agencies.

After months of calling the program voluntary, federal officials suddenly reversed course last fall, when Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said the agency does not "consider Secure Communities an opt in/opt out program."

The statement came as a surprise to local governments that had voted to opt-out of the program -- a list that includes San Francisco and Santa Clara, Calif., Arlington, Va., and Washington, D.C. -- and started working with the federal government to do so.

But local officials were told that truly opting out, or refusing to give fingerprints to DHS, was impossible. Critics of the program requested a number of internal emails under the Freedom of Information Act and found the agency disseminated misleading information on details of the program.

The Department of Homeland Security has defended the program, arguing that it does not add to police responsibilities.

"By removing criminal aliens more efficiently and effectively, ICE is reducing the possibility that these individuals will commit additional crimes in U.S. communities and thereby reducing long-term costs to local law enforcement and improving public safety," a DHS spokesperson said.

The agency could not speculate on how it would respond if the bills were passed, said the spokesperson. But Fred Tsao of the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, which helped to draft the Illinois bill, said DHS has no authority to force the program on local jurisdictions.

"This is merely an ICE program, it's not mandated by federal law," Tsao said. "There's no federal statutory commandment saying that ICE has to implement Secure Communities or that local communities have to sign on to it."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/2 ... 52277.html

If states pass laws like this and counties withdraw from Secure Communities
I hope that illegal aliens flock to those counties and their crime rate goes up.
That should teach them a lesson.

But critics of Secure Communities note the program also nets a large number of undocumented immigrants who are never convicted of a crime, or are convicted of only low-level violations such as selling phone cards or driving without a license.

Untill the so called low level moves up to a bigger crime when so called law man walks away...umm big crimes start small..

State lawmakers in Illinois and California are pushing to cut their states' ties to an immigration enforcement program that they say was unfairly imposed on local governments against their wishes.

Against their wishes? Why don't these traitors ask the people of their respective states ( the people they are supposed to be representing) what they wish to happen regarding immigration enforcment?

I have to wonder what it says for a politician that can't get enough votes to stay in power from legal citizens and feels the need to harbor illegals in order to be able to count on their illegal vote to stay in power.

What happened to them screaming States don't have the right to make Immigration Law and Immigraion Law is the jurisdiction of our Federal Gov. .

I think we all get the picture.

I have a very strange feeling about some people and I think they should be investigated. "Money is the rule of all evil."

maybe the people of these states who support this program need to get together and file a class action lawsuit against those legislators who want to get rid of it

Originally Posted by USPatriot

What happened to them screaming States don't have the right to make Immigration Law and Immigraion Law is the jurisdiction of our Federal Gov. .

What makes it even more shocking is that our official unemployment rate recently dropped to a mere 12%! It's as if the pro-illegals crowd no longer even thinks about the impact of their proposals on Americans.

When Chipotle's and the Pei Wei chain had to dismiss illegals, Pei Wei held a job fair. It was flooded with desparate Americans. And still the pro-illegals crowd doesn't seem to care about the impact of their proposals on our own people.
************************************************** *************************************
Americans first in this magnificent country

American jobs for American workers

Fair trade, not free trade

Originally Posted by JohnDoe2

If states pass laws like this and counties withdraw from Secure Communities
I hope that illegal aliens flock to those counties and their crime rate goes up.
That should teach them a lesson.

You're darn right JD! Maybe when some of these illegal alien friendly states or cities start to see the destruction these invaders cause, they will start serious enforcement.