Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
02-04-2007, 08:56 AM #1
Suburban Chicago residents oppose shelter for immigrant chil
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/16616255.htm
Posted on Sat, Feb. 03, 2007
Suburban Chicago residents oppose shelter for immigrant children
NATHANIEL HERNANDEZ
Associated Press
CHICAGO - The children rarely leave the federal immigrant shelter, a former nursing home near the city's lakefront that houses undocumented children found alone in the U.S.
Teachers and doctors are brought to them. And aside from occasional field trips or visits to a nearby park, the children spend almost all their time indoors - although it may be months before they know whether they will be deported or allowed to stay.
But plans to provide more room by converting a 2.5-acre estate near suburban Naperville - with an 11,000-square-foot house, tennis court and swimming pool - into a first-of-its-kind shelter for undocumented Indian and Chinese children hit a snag:
Neighbors in wealthy Lisle Township don't want them.
They say the shelter, which would house as many as 30 children, could create traffic problems, lower property values and strain water and sewer services.
But some also worry that the children could escape and pose a threat to their own children. A flier circulated throughout the neighborhood said the shelter would be "WORSE than a halfway house!"
"We're not against the children. We're not against anybody," said Daniel Daghfal, who helped organize opposition to the shelter, which requires a conditional use permit.
"What we're saying is instead of changing the zoning, find a neighborhood that has that capability and has that type of dwelling," he said. "The whole purpose of the zoning laws is to protect the integrity of the neighborhood."
But Hugo Ruiz, managing director of youth and residential services at Heartland Alliance Inc., the not-for-profit group that would operate the shelter, said he can't help but wonder if that's true.
He said the flier, "created a panic" and was the result of misinformation. And whenever Heartland has addressed a concern, a new one has surfaced, Ruiz said. At a DuPage County Zoning Board meeting on Thursday, residents submitted a list of police calls in the area around the Chicago shelter - even though no crimes were connected with the shelter, Heartland officials said.
The board deadlocked 3-3 in a vote over whether to allow the shelter. Now the issue goes to the County Board.
"It seems to be a moving target," Ruiz said. "I would be surmising here, but it seems that they just don't want us there. And that makes me sad. If we knew that their concerns were real and legitimate that would be different."
Children apprehended after entering the country illegally without a parent or guardian are placed in one of 30 shelters run by the U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement, if a relative cannot be located here.
Many children come to escape poverty, but others could be fleeing war-torn regions or persecution; some may have been trafficked to work in forced-labor conditions, officials said. Law students work with children to ensure they are not deported if they have valid claims for asylum.
The Lisle Township shelter would be the first in the U.S. to cater only to children from China and India, who comprise less than 1 percent of all children in federal custody. They typically stay in the U.S. longer than those from Latin America because their cases are more complicated.
Chicago's children's shelter opened in 1996 following minimal opposition. But there has been opposition elsewhere.
When residents in the Flushing section of Queens, N.Y., objected to a children's shelter, officials allayed their concerns by providing a clearer picture of how the shelter would operate and the children it would serve, ORR Director Martha Newton said.
"If you go around and visit and see the shelters and the way we operate them, in most instances, you wouldn't even know it's there," she said.
"The concerns and fears had some basis, but that was before all of the facts of what actually was being proposed came into the open," said New York City Councilman John C. Liu, noting there have been no complaints about the shelter since it opened in 2005.
But Lisle Township residents say the issue boils down to a question of local rule and whether a community has the right to block an unwanted, federally funded program.
"It's a quiet, equestrian estate house," Daghfal said. "They are going to change the whole outlook of the environment."Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 09:01 AM #2
First, I don't understand why our government is giving 30 kids a swimming pool and a tennis court when it's like pulling teeth to get them to give us money to revamp recreation centers around the city. Not to mention the annual expense of pool maintenance. They can go to the local rec. center, just like the rest of us.
That needs to be removed from the budget of those homes. Give them the same thing the public schools have and not something better.
I feel the neighborhood has a right to object. This could devalue their homes. Today, it's a group home for children and tomorrow it could be a halfway house for parolees. No thanks!
DixieJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 09:30 AM #3
Where is La Raza,and friends?
Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 09:43 AM #4
I just think this is the weirdest story.
Why do we have kids from India and China in our immigration system? I know they didn't buy a plane ticket and come over here without some help. Then our government is wanting to put them up in a resort.
I really want to know more about these homes (the facility and what they cost us) and how the kids end up in them. Are these anchor kids? Seriously, did thier parents/relatives put them on a plane, in the hopes they will become citizens/visa holders so they can sponsor other family members? I guess some countries think American government will not deny the children.
Truth is better than fiction.
DixieJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 09:49 AM #5
I have a better and cheaper solution. It is called foster homes or temporary homes where the kids have a mom and dad and a back yard and are taken care of as if they were with their parents. If there are siblings they could be in a home together if there aren't too many of them. It also separates them from others which may be a bad influence.
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 10:23 AM #6
I was thinking the same thing. Why not just put them into the foster care system.
DixieJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 10:52 AM #7
Well I think it is racist that LaRaza and friends are not helping them!!!
Maybe we should sue them for ignoreing these kids!!
But good question where did they come from? and how did they get there?Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)
-
02-04-2007, 10:57 AM #8
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- North Carolina
- Posts
- 8,399
Duplicate post.
Please see http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... 220#289220Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
72 Hours Till Deadline: Durbin moves on Amnesty
04-28-2024, 02:18 PM in illegal immigration Announcements