Thread: Ron Paul Gets Least Amount of Time at CNBC Debate

Ron Paul Gets Least Amount of Time at CNBC Debate

Dearborn, MI 10/11/2007 11:22 AM GMT (FINDITT)



USAElectionPolls.com parsed through the transcripts at the CNBC Republican debate October 9th, 2007 and found that of all the candidates, Ron Paul got the least amount of time to speak.

Mitt Romney had almost four times the amount of time to speak than did Ron Paul.

Candidates like Sam Brownback, Duncan Hunter, and Tom Tancredo are performing worse in state polls, national polls, fundraising and straw polls yet had more time to speak.

USAElectionPolls.com asks the question, "A candidate that raised $5 million dollars, won 14 straw polls, and is at or above the margin of error in 8 states only had 5.8% of the time to speak at the latest debate?"

http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory ... 4989&cat=1

I noticed Ron Paul received less time to debate. That is because he is GOOD, and that scares OBL'rs.

I agree Butterbean. I've often wondered what their reasoning behind barely allowing Congressman Paul any time at all.

Could it be that this man actually has no skeletons in his closet for the MSM to dig up and exploit?
Or do they simply perceive him as a potential threat?

It's interesting to read stuff from hannity, which I lost respect for after he bashed Paul and supports rudy and flip flop head, and other media outlets because they all state, "...Paul has no chance. blah blah blah.", but you don't usually find them throwing out stuff like "Paul's campaign manager was arrested for illegal campaign contributions..."

We all know one of the media's favorite things, especially prior to upcoming elections, to dig up as much political dirt as possible.

Could it be they can't find any on Dr. Paul?

I know that Glenn Beck is doing a negative peice on RP tonite. He is upset that RP said that Iran is no threat to us. He largely disagress and has said that he has invited RP to speak on his show but went on Wolf Blitzer instead. He is against RP.

ONCE MORE, I heard the following comments on LIBERAL RADIO:

We give more time to the top candidates, namely, Romney, Guiliani, McCain, Clinton, Obama, because they win all the REAL polls. The polls on the internet mean NOTHING because a few people vote over and over, making the polls worthless.

AND I GUESS IT WAS THESE SAME "FEW" PEOPLE WHO DONATED $5 MILLION TO PAUL IN SUCH A SHORT TIME?????????

Originally Posted by CitizenJustice

ONCE MORE, I heard the following comments on LIBERAL RADIO:

We give more time to the top candidates, namely, Romney, Guiliani, McCain, Clinton, Obama, because they win all the REAL polls. The polls on the internet mean NOTHING because a few people vote over and over, making the polls worthless.

AND I GUESS IT WAS THESE SAME "FEW" PEOPLE WHO DONATED $5 MILLION TO PAUL IN SUCH A SHORT TIME?????????

I'm not supporting Romney, Guiliani, McCain, Clinton, Obama. Perhaps I'll send Ron my contribution !

Already sent Ron my contributions, and am continuing to do so.

Ron Paul 08