Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675

    Illegal Alien Costs For South Carolina

    Scroll further down for Illegal Alien stats.


    Extended Immigration Data for South Carolina





    Summary Demographic State Data (and Source)
    Population (2006 CB estimate): 4,321,249
    Population (2000 Census): 4,012,012
    Foreign-Born Population (2006 FAIR estimate):
    Foreign-Born Population (2000 Census): 150,605
    115,978
    Share Foreign-Born (2006 FAIR estimate):
    Share Foreign-Born (2000): 3.5%
    2.9%
    Immigrant Stock (2000 CB estimate): 131,000
    Share Immigrant Stock (2000 estimate): 3.3%
    Naturalized U.S. Citizens (2000 Census): 42,983
    Share Naturalized (2000): 37.1%
    Legal Immigrant Admission (INS 1996-2005): 26,253
    Refugee Admission (2004 HHS): 150
    Illegal Alien Population (2007 FAIR estimate): 75,000
    Projected Population - 2025 (2001 FAIR): 5,698,000
    Projected Population - 2050 (2006 FAIR): 6,373,401


    STATE POPULATION

    The Census Bureau estimated that in July 2006 South Carolina’s population had increased by an annual average of about 49,115 residents since 2000 (to 4,321,249 residents). Over that period net international migration (more immigrants arriving than leaving) was adding about 6,375 persons each year. During the same period there was an annual average population gain of about 26,520 residents from net domestic migration (more native-born residents arriving than leaving).

    Net immigrant settlement accounted for about 13 percent of the population increase over this period, and that does not include the children born to the immigrants after their arrival in the United States. The current annual average level of immigrant settlement is about 209 percent higher than during the 1990s.




    [Note: children born in the United States to immigrants (part of the immigrant stock) are no included as part of the immigration flow.]

    The population of South Carolina increased by 11.7 percent between 1980-90 (from 3,120,729 to 3,486,703 residents).
    The 2000 Census found 4,012,012 persons resident in South Carolina. This was an increase of 525,309 persons above the 1990 Census (15.1%). The amount of increase was the 19th highest in the country. The rate of increase was the 15th fastest increasing population in the country.

    The 2000 population is about 54,000 more persons than the Census Bureau had expected to find in the state in 2000 when it issued its most recent state population projections in 1996. The significance of this is that the Census Bureau has concluded that much of the shortfall in their population estimates during the 1990s was due to an underestimation of the illegal alien population.

    South Carolina had the 20th highest rate of population increase in the country between 1960-2000.

    FOREIGN-BORN POPULATION

    FAIR estimates that the foreign-born population of South Carolina was about 150,605 residents in July 2006. This meant a foreign-born population share of 3.5 percent. The amount of change since the 2000 Census indicates an average annual rate of increase in the foreign-born population of about 5,495 people, which is 11.2 percent of the state’s annual average population increase. Immigration also contributes to population growth through the children born to immigrants in this country. Nationally the share of births to the foreign-born is about double their share of the population. A seven percent share of the state’s current births is large enough to account for about 3,870 births a year. Combining the increase in the foreign-born population and estimated immigrant births suggests that immigration may be adding as many as 9,365 persons to the state’s population annually, i.e., nearly one-fifth (19.1%) of the state’s overall population increase.

    The 2000 Census recorded 115,978 foreign-born residents in the state. That was 2.9 percent of the state's overall population and an increase of 132.1 percent above the 1990 foreign-born population of 49,964 residents. That more than doubling of the immigrant population was much higher than the 13.4 percent increase in the native-born population. The amount of increase was not among the 25 highest in the country, but the rate of increase in the foreign-born population was the 11th highest in the country.

    A comparison of the increase in the immigrant population from 1990 with the change in the overall population during the same period shows that immigrant settlement directly accounted for 12.6 percent of the state's overall population increase over that decade. The share of the population increase due to immigration would be still higher if the children of the immigrants born here after their arrival were included with their immigrant parents in the calculation. The amount of the overall impact of immigration on population change (immigrants plus their children) is more likely to account for about 16 percent of the state's population increase, based on the increase in the share of those who speak a language other than English at home in South Carolina.


    South Carolina ranked 7th nationally in the rate of foreign-born change between 1965-2005.

    The 2000 Census found that 52.4 percent of South Carolina's foreign-born population had arrived in the state since 1990. This demonstrates the effects of the current mass immigration, and it is a much higher share than the national average (43.7%).
    An indicator of the change in the immigrant population may be seen in data on the share of the population that speaks a language other than English at home. Between 1990 and 2000 the share of non-English speakers at home in South Carolina increased by nearly half, from 3.5 percent to 5.1 percent. Less than half (41.9%) of those who said they spoke a language other than English at home in 2000 also said they spoke English less than very well.

    Speakers of Foreign Languages
    (at home in South Carolina in the 2000 Census)

    Spanish 110,030

    French 19,030

    German 15,195

    Chinese 5,005

    Tagalog 4,495

    Vietnamese 3,770

    Korean 3,295

    Italian 3,090

    Japanese 2,805

    Greek 2,565

    (Source: Census Bureau report: Language Spoken at Home for the Population 5 Years and Over, April 2004)


    The immigrant population of South Carolina increased by 8.5 percent between 1980-90 (from 46,060 to 49,964 residents). The foreign-born share of the 1990 population was 1.4 percent (1.5% in 1980).

    Foreign-Born Change Since 1980: Top Ten Countries 1980-2000
    Rank Country 1980 Country 1990 Country 2000
    1 Germany 6,216 Germany 6,224 Mexico 31,719
    2 U.K. 4,617 U.K. 5,130 Germany 7,873
    3 Philip. 2,599 Philip. 3,429 U.K. 6,890
    4 Canada 2,255 Canada 3,218 Canada 5,512
    5 Korea 1,560 India 2,307 India 5,130
    6 France 1,469 Mexico 2,147 Philip. 5,108
    7 Japan 1,285 Korea 1,866 China * 4,541
    8 India 1,192 Japan 1,665 Colombia 3,394
    9 Greece 1,105 Vietnam 1,041 Vietnam 3,098
    10 Sov.Un. 957 Greece 1,038 Korea 3,030
    All Others 22,825 All Other 21,899 All Others 39,683
    Total 46,080 Total 49,899 Total 115,978

    * 2000 Census data for China include Hong Kong and Taiwan.

    The ten countries above constituted nearly two-thirds (65.8%) of the foreign-born population in South Carolina in 2000. Persons born in Mexico alone accounted for more than one-quarter (27.3%) of the total foreign-born population. Compared to the 25,524 Mexican-born residents from the 2000 Census who said they entered the United States between 1990-2000, INS data (see below) indicate that the total number of legal Mexican immigrants who listed South Carolina as their intended residence during that period numbered about 3,300 persons.
    The Census Bureau estimated from its American Community Survey that in 2002 the foreign-born population of South Carolina was about 138,500 persons. The chart below shows the regions from which those foreign residents came.



    IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE DATA (Click here for data on immigrant settlement.)

    THE IMMIGRANT STOCK
    The 2000 Census recorded 131,000 people in South Carolina who were "immigrant stock." That is a term that refers to immigrants and their children born here after their arrival. Based on that estimate, and a population of 4,012,012, the immigrant stock share of the state's population was 3.3 percent.

    As the graph below shows, the amount and share of South Carolina's population change due to the increase in the foreign stock is rising rapidly. Over the past 34 years the new immigrants and children born to them have added about 162,500 people to the population. Over this period, the increase in the foreign stock has accounted for 10.2 percent of the state’s population increase.



    NATURALIZATION
    Data from the 2000 Census recorded South Carolina's naturalized population at 42,983. That was a naturalization rate of 37.1 percent, lower than the national average of 40.1 percent. The precipitous drop in the rate of naturalization (see 1990 data below) indicates a rapidly increasing foreign-born population, including illegal immigrants.

    Data from the 1990 Census showed that 50.9 percent of South Carolina's 49,964 foreign-born residents had become naturalized U.S. citizens. This was much higher than the national average (40.3%).

    Refugee Settlement
    South Carolina has received over 823 refugees over the most recent nine fiscal years (FY'96-'04) for permanent resettlement (180 in FY'04). The average has been 90 refugees per year.


    Under the Office of Refugee Resettlement's (HHS) assistance funding for FY'02 $96,932 is available for refugee employment training and other services programs in South Carolina based on a three-year refugee settlement program covering 237 refugees (an average of $251 per refugee). This allocation does not include a larger share (55%) of funding programs for communities heavily affected by recent Cuban and Haitian entrants, communities with refugees whose cultural differences make assimilation especially difficult, communities impacted by federal welfare reform changes, educational support to schools with significant refugee students, and discretionary grants.

    SOCIAL ISSUES
    The Hispanic population in South Carolina is growing about six times faster that the state's overall population. Most of this increase is from immigration. Part of the explanation for this rapid change is the "population pipeline" between the communities in the sending country and the receiving country, and in part it may be due to large families. Mike Scardaville, a professor of Latin American studies at the University of South Carolina, estimates that the Hispanic growth rate is still higher because minorities and illegal aliens are undercounted and there has been an increase in the flow of newcomers. He estimates the Hispanic population to now be at least 150,000 compared to the 30,600 found in the 1990 Census.

    One of the result of this rapid population change is that public employees in places such as Newberry are finding themselves in the unexpected position of studying Spanish to be able to provide services, from marriage licenses to medical and welfare services, to the newcomers. Although many of the arriving Hispanics may be legal residents or even U.S. citizens, others are illegal aliens attracted by low-skilled jobs and the absence of an INS office. However, a change may be taking place as a result of the opening of a new INS office in Charleston. According to Jose Monge, an immigration attorney in Columbia, "It's going to get hot."
    (Source: The State (Columbia), April 18, 199

    The influx of hundreds of immigrants to Greenwood to work at Greenwood Packing in 1994 unleashed a scramble among service providers to cope with the new situation. There were some early tensions with the city's minority black population over what was seen as job competition. The police chief says that tensions have now subsided, but local residents dispute that. The local school gained 23 Spanish-speaking children overnight. Health care providers couldn't communicate with the new patients. The local Job Service office has required non-English speakers to bring interpreters with them, but there were few bilingual persons in the area, and they became over-burdened. The labor contractor who recruited the Hispanic workers in Texas, provides them sub-standard housing for free. The meat processing employer is attacked by many of the workers for taking advantage of non-English speaking employees. According to one employee, "They only want people who will keep their mouths shut. If you defend yourself, they don't want you."
    (Source: The State (Columbia), April 18 and 26, 199

    LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY STUDENTS
    Data are not available nationally on immigrant students (either legally or illegally resident in the United States) who are enrolled in primary and secondary schools (K-12). However, many of these students are enrolled in Limited English Proficiency/English Language Learning (LEP/ELL) instruction programs. Many may be U.S.-born, but the majority of these students may be assumed to be either immigrants or the children of immigrants, with the exception being areas with native Americans who speak a native language other than English.


    In South Carolina, overall enrollment in 2002 (648,000) was 5.9 percent below enrollment in 1993. By contrast, LEP enrollment (7,004 - 1.1% of all enrollment) was 339 percent higher than a decade earlier.
    Data on enrollment in LEP/ELL programs are collected by the federal government from school systems that receive Title VII funds for these special instruction programs. The data on LEP/ELL enrollment are understated because data from private schools that do not apply for Title VII assistance are sketchy.

    FOREIGN STUDENTS
    The 2006/07 annual report of the Institute of International Education (IIE) lists the number of foreign students attending post-secondary school in South Carolina as 3,556. One school in South Carolina is listed as having a major concentration of these students: University of South Carolina-Columbia had an enrollment of 1,114 foreign students, 4.1% of total enrollment. Below, a chart illustrates the sharp increase of foreign students attending school in South Carolina 1960-2000.



    For information on foreign student issues see: Foreign Students in the United States.

    ILLEGAL ALIENS

    FAIR Estimate - FAIR’s estimate of the state’s illegal alien population as of 2007 is about 75,000 persons. This is part of an overall estimate of the U.S. illegal alien population of about 13 million persons.

    INS/DHS Estimate - The INS (now dissolved into the Dept. of Homeland Security) estimated in February 2003 that the resident illegal population in South Carolina was 36,000 as of January 2000. This number over 31,000 higher than the INS' 1996 estimate.

    Other Estimates - The Pew Hispanic Center estimates the illegal alien population of the state at 35,000 to 75,000 as of 2005.



    COST OF ILLEGAL ALIENS


    Incarceration Costs


    The INS estimated in February 2003 that the illegal alien population in South Carolina was about 36,000. That was almost eight times the previous INS estimate that there were about 4,800 illegal aliens residing in the state as of October 1996. The latter estimate was 17 percent higher than the estimate of the number of illegal aliens in October 1992.

    South Carolina has received partial compensation under the federal State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) that was established in 1994 to compensate the states and local jurisdictions for incarceration of "undocumented," aliens who are serving time for a felony conviction or at least two misdemeanors.

    The recent SCAAP amounts that South Carolina has received were:


    FY’99—$1,029,751
    FY’00—$873,493
    FY’01—$889,885
    FY’02—$963,588
    FY’03—$298,985
    FY’04—$432,428
    The amount of SCAAP awards has been declining in both total distributions and even more as a share of the state’s expenses. In FY’99 the state received 38.6% of its costs for 189 prisoner years of detention. By FY’02, the state’s reported illegal alien detention rose by 71 percent to 324 prisoner years, while compensation fell by six percent and since has decreased rapidly.


    Medical Costs

    Under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, hospitals with emergency rooms are required to treat and stabilize patients with emergency medical needs regardless whether or not they are in the country legally or whether they are able to pay for the treatment. Congress in 2003 enacted an appropriation of $250 million per year (for 4 years) to help offset some of the costs due to use of this service by illegal aliens. This amount has been allocated among the states based upon estimates of the illegal alien population and data on the apprehension of illegal aliens in each state. This amount compensates only a fraction of the medical outlays. For South Carolina, the proposed payment in fiscal year 2004 is $858,489.


    Educational Costs

    In our study Breaking the Piggy Bank: How Illegal Immigration is Sending Schools into the Red, we estimated based on 2004 data that educational expenditures for illegal immigration were costing the South Carolina taxpayer $143.5 million dollars annually. This cost was partially for educating students who were themselves illegally in the country ($59.8 million) and in part for the education of their siblings born in the United States to illegal residents ($83.7 million).

    Projected Fiscal Costs

    In 2006 we estimated that South Carolina taxpayers are currently burdened with annual costs of about $186 million because of illegal aliens residing in the state. That estimate was based on only expenditures for education, emergency medical care and incarceration. We projected that those costs will rise unless we gain control over our borders and our worksites. If a new amnesty and increases in immigrants and guest workers were enacted, as proposed by business and ethnic advocacy groups, we project that the cost to the state’s taxpayers for those same programs would rise to $333 million per year in 2010 and to $615 million per year in 2020


    ALSO WATCH RELATED VIDEO
    http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-591497.html#591497






    http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?p ... searchf422
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member USA_born's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    916
    Those people voted for McCain. In other words, they voted for more of the same. They must not care.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •