Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Texas border mayors block access to proposed fence sites

    Comments are being left after this article at the source link.
    ~~~
    Oct. 2, 2007, 9:06PM
    Texas border mayors block access to proposed fence sites


    By JUAN A. LOZANO
    Associated Press
    BROWNSVILLE — Mayors along the Texas-Mexico border have begun a quiet protest of the federal government's plans to build a fence along the border: They are refusing to give access to their land.

    Mayors in Brownsville, Del Rio and El Paso have denied access to some parts of their city property, turning away federal employees assigned to begin surveys or conduct other preliminary work on the fence meant to keep out illegal immigrants.

    "This is exercising our rights. This is our property. We are not going to make it easy for them," said Brownsville Mayor Pat Ahumada, who refused last month to sign documents granting government workers permission to enter city property.

    In Eagle Pass, Mayor Chad Foster initially refused the Border Patrol's request to build 1 1/2 miles of fencing as part of a project that includes light towers and a new road for patrols. Now he is negotiating with the Department of Homeland Security.

    "All of us are in opposition to physical barriers, but we want to work with DHS so everybody walks away happy," Foster said.

    Del Rio and El Paso granted workers limited access, said Monica Weisberg Stewart of the Texas Border Coalition, a group that represents local officials.

    Congress has authorized $1.2 billion to put up 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The project would include about 330 miles of so-called virtual fence — a network of cameras, high-tech sensors, radar and other technology. The remaining 370 miles, primarily in more urban areas, are expected to have an actual fence.

    State and local officials have said the fence will destroy ecosystems by cutting off the Rio Grande, the only source of fresh water in the region. They also say it will hurt the cross-border economy and send the wrong message to neighbors in Mexico.

    Brownsville, a city of 170,000 people across the Rio Grande from Matamoros, Mexico, is considering a lawsuit against the federal government to prevent the fence's construction on city property. City leaders met with attorneys Tuesday night about that possibility but decided to wait two weeks before deciding.

    "If we have to we'll take it all the way up to the Supreme Court," Ahumada said.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesman Brad Benson said the federal government has not responded to the cities yet, but officials expected some land owners would refuse.

    "We will work with everybody. We plan to accommodate any credible concerns with regard to the environment," Benson said. "Our mission at the end of the day is to secure the border."

    David Crump, a professor at the University of Houston Law Center, said for now, land owners can keep anybody out of their property for any reason, but a legislative body could override that right.

    "Either the Texas Legislature or Congress can give power to an agency to do it," said Crump, who specializes in real property law.

    Maps released last month by the federal government show the proposed location of about 70 miles of border fencing in south Texas, stretching from Rio Grande City southeast to Fort Brown, next to Brownsville. Maps of fencing being proposed for other parts of the state have not been released.

    The maps show nearly 23 miles of fence would be built in and around Brownsville, including some city property. Ahumada pointed out of his office window to land only three blocks away as potential fenced-in areas.

    Ahumada said a nearly $40 million dam-and-reservoir project proposed for Brownsville would provide a natural physical barrier and offer better border security than the fence.

    The Department of Homeland Security has said it is committed to erecting 370 miles of fencing by the end of 2008.

    If Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff "is determined to build a wall. I wish Mr. Chertoff would build a wall around his house," Ahumada said. "We don't want this wall."

    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5183227.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    747
    "Democrats Fall in Love, Republicans Fall in Line!"

    Ex-El Presidente' www.jorgeboosh.com

  3. #3
    Senior Member IndianaJones's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,235
    If Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff "is determined to build a wall. I wish Mr. Chertoff would build a wall around his house," Ahumada said. "We don't want this wall."
    They want to be hardasses about it, let's find out what the REAL reason is!
    We are NOT a nation of immigrants!

  4. #4
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    I don't normally support the condemnation of private property, however, in the interest of national security I think the federal government should condemn the necessary land and be done with it!

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    One thing is for sure, the border should have an easement so that no one land owner has his property line right on the border. Is this not the case?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    Border Fence Meeting
    Tuesday , October 02, 2007 Posted: 11:02 PM

    City commissioners open the floor to public comment on proposed border fence.

    Brownsville - During a City Commissioner's meeting Tuesday night, tempers flared when commissioners opened the floor to comment on the proposed border fence.

    Commissioner Charlie Atkinson says "They're going to put the wall here whether we like it or not, until we fight. There's alternatives."

    One of the alternatives discussed included installing a dam on the Rio Grande, raising the river level from 12 to 27 feet. Making it a natural barrier that can be patrolled with speed boats.

    During the meeting tempers flared when one citizen questioned the city commissioners for not making up their minds on the issue. Which prompted Commissioner Atkinson to walk out of council chambers

    For now the government says they're only doing an environmental study on the fence. You can count on NEWSCHANNEL 5 to keep you posted on developments

    http://www.newschannel5.tv/2007/10/2/98 ... -Meeting--
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •