Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Texas group sues to stop construction of border fence

    May 16, 2008, 6:29PM
    Texas group sues to stop construction of border fence


    By STEWART M. POWELL
    Houston Chronicle Washington Bureau

    TOOLS
    Email Get section feed
    Print Recommend (1)
    Comments (122) Yahoo! Buzz
    WASHINGTON — A drive by the Bush administration to build 70 miles of fencing along the Texas-Mexico border before leaving office could be sidetracked by a lawsuit filed by 19 border communities on Friday.

    The Texas Border Coalition, citing what it called "lawless conduct" by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, asked a U.S. District Court judge here to force the federal government to halt construction of the barrier and land acquisition.

    The lawsuit accused Chertoff and others of failing to notify landowners of their rights, failing to negotiate a reasonable price for access to their lands and of exempting some wealthy owners from having the fence built across their properties.

    Chertoff "has gone too far in his zeal to build this feel-good, yet ineffective Great Wall of Texas," said Eagle Pass Mayor Chad Foster, the chairman of the border coalition, which represents cities from Brownsville to El Paso.

    Brownsville Mayor Patricio M. Ahumada Jr. charged that federal officials tried to "ramrod a wall" on local communities, adding: ''They are determined to build a wall to appease mid-America."

    Peter Schey, executive director of the Los Angeles-based Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law and lead counsel in the case, said Friday's lawsuit would be followed within days by a request for a temporary restraining order to block land seizures and fence construction.

    The case is handled by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton, named to the federal bench by President Bush in 2001.

    The Bush administration is pressing to complete construction of 670 miles of physical barriers and high-tech virtual fencing along the entire 1,972 mile U.S.-Mexico border. But the legal wrangling could delay construction of the fence in Texas, pushing decisions on completion of the barriers into next year when a new president and a new Congress will take office.

    Laura Keehner, a spokeswoman for the Homeland Security Department, said the lawsuit is a delaying tactic and added that construction would continue.

    "There should be no uncertainty about our commitment to border security, and we've made no secret that fencing is a key part of our efforts at the border," Keehner said. "We're building 670 miles of fencing by the end of this year and are well on our way to meeting this goal."

    The lawsuit was designed to force federal officials to restart a protracted process to survey land as a first step to federal purchase.

    Chertoff has run "roughshod over the rights of property owners to build a border wall on a foundation of lawlessness," Schey said. "We hope that we are able to bring this lawless conduct to build this wall into conformity with federal statutes and the United States Constitution."

    Federal officials intimidated some land owners along the border by sending Homeland Security officials and agents of the Corps of Engineers and Border Patrol to try to arrange access to survey their properties, Schey said.

    The suit also noted that fence construction would bypass the River Bend Resort and golf course in Brownsville and border lands owned by Dallas billionaire Ray Hunt and his relatives.

    Keehner, Chertoff's spokesman, rejected the lawsuit's allegations.

    "We've nearly bent over backward to work with landowners," she said in a statement.

    She noted that year-long discussions had taken place with landowners and state and local officials "about the placement of fencing."

    Federal officials, she said, contacted more than 600 different landowners, held dozens of town hall meetings and mailed hundreds of letters to land owners "requesting access to private property so that we could make operational and environmental assessments of the area prior to making any decisions."

    Border fence construction has become increasingly contentious in Texas, with landowners' resistance forcing federal authorities to file lawsuits against nearly 100 owners in four states in an effort to gain court-ordered access to the land. A family from Los Ebanos, Texas, awaits a hearing on July 7 before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans on their attempt to block access by federal authorities.

    The Texas officials' legal challenge is the latest high-profile effort to prevent construction of the fence.

    The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing a request by environmentalists and members of Congress to hear a case challenging Chertoff's constitutional authority to waive compliance with three dozen federal laws in order to speed construction of the barriers.

    stewart.powell@chron.com



    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5785497.html
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    34,925
    Texas Border Coalition useing city funds to sue the federal government.

    http://www.texasbordercoalition.org/ind ... &Itemid=44

    Join the TBC in its efforts to promote and improve the quality of life in Texas/Mexico border regions in building the border region. Today’s “border
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member koobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,699
    sounds like the ACLU got involed
    Proud to be an AMERICAN

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •